Cargando…
Inferences from tip‐calibrated phylogenies: a review and a practical guide
Molecular dating of phylogenetic trees is a growing discipline using sequence data to co‐estimate the timing of evolutionary events and rates of molecular evolution. All molecular‐dating methods require converting genetic divergence between sequences into absolute time. Historically, this could only...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4949988/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26880113 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/mec.13586 |
_version_ | 1782443505557176320 |
---|---|
author | Rieux, Adrien Balloux, François |
author_facet | Rieux, Adrien Balloux, François |
author_sort | Rieux, Adrien |
collection | PubMed |
description | Molecular dating of phylogenetic trees is a growing discipline using sequence data to co‐estimate the timing of evolutionary events and rates of molecular evolution. All molecular‐dating methods require converting genetic divergence between sequences into absolute time. Historically, this could only be achieved by associating externally derived dates obtained from fossil or biogeographical evidence to internal nodes of the tree. In some cases, notably for fast‐evolving genomes such as viruses and some bacteria, the time span over which samples were collected may cover a significant proportion of the time since they last shared a common ancestor. This situation allows phylogenetic trees to be calibrated by associating sampling dates directly to the sequences representing the tips (terminal nodes) of the tree. The increasing availability of genomic data from ancient DNA extends the applicability of such tip‐based calibration to a variety of taxa including humans, extinct megafauna and various microorganisms which typically have a scarce fossil record. The development of statistical models accounting for heterogeneity in different aspects of the evolutionary process while accommodating very large data sets (e.g. whole genomes) has allowed using tip‐dating methods to reach inferences on divergence times, substitution rates, past demography or the age of specific mutations on a variety of spatiotemporal scales. In this review, we summarize the current state of the art of tip dating, discuss some recent applications, highlight common pitfalls and provide a ‘how to’ guide to thoroughly perform such analyses. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4949988 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49499882016-07-28 Inferences from tip‐calibrated phylogenies: a review and a practical guide Rieux, Adrien Balloux, François Mol Ecol Invited Reviews and Syntheses Molecular dating of phylogenetic trees is a growing discipline using sequence data to co‐estimate the timing of evolutionary events and rates of molecular evolution. All molecular‐dating methods require converting genetic divergence between sequences into absolute time. Historically, this could only be achieved by associating externally derived dates obtained from fossil or biogeographical evidence to internal nodes of the tree. In some cases, notably for fast‐evolving genomes such as viruses and some bacteria, the time span over which samples were collected may cover a significant proportion of the time since they last shared a common ancestor. This situation allows phylogenetic trees to be calibrated by associating sampling dates directly to the sequences representing the tips (terminal nodes) of the tree. The increasing availability of genomic data from ancient DNA extends the applicability of such tip‐based calibration to a variety of taxa including humans, extinct megafauna and various microorganisms which typically have a scarce fossil record. The development of statistical models accounting for heterogeneity in different aspects of the evolutionary process while accommodating very large data sets (e.g. whole genomes) has allowed using tip‐dating methods to reach inferences on divergence times, substitution rates, past demography or the age of specific mutations on a variety of spatiotemporal scales. In this review, we summarize the current state of the art of tip dating, discuss some recent applications, highlight common pitfalls and provide a ‘how to’ guide to thoroughly perform such analyses. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-04-20 2016-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4949988/ /pubmed/26880113 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/mec.13586 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Molecular Ecology Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Invited Reviews and Syntheses Rieux, Adrien Balloux, François Inferences from tip‐calibrated phylogenies: a review and a practical guide |
title | Inferences from tip‐calibrated phylogenies: a review and a practical guide |
title_full | Inferences from tip‐calibrated phylogenies: a review and a practical guide |
title_fullStr | Inferences from tip‐calibrated phylogenies: a review and a practical guide |
title_full_unstemmed | Inferences from tip‐calibrated phylogenies: a review and a practical guide |
title_short | Inferences from tip‐calibrated phylogenies: a review and a practical guide |
title_sort | inferences from tip‐calibrated phylogenies: a review and a practical guide |
topic | Invited Reviews and Syntheses |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4949988/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26880113 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/mec.13586 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rieuxadrien inferencesfromtipcalibratedphylogeniesareviewandapracticalguide AT ballouxfrancois inferencesfromtipcalibratedphylogeniesareviewandapracticalguide |