Cargando…

A comparative study of dipolarization fronts at MMS and Cluster

We present a statistical study of dipolarization fronts (DFs), using magnetic field data from MMS and Cluster, at radial distances below 12 R (E) and 20 R (E), respectively. Assuming that the DFs have a semicircular cross section and are propelled by the magnetic tension force, we used multispacecra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schmid, D., Nakamura, R., Volwerk, M., Plaschke, F., Narita, Y., Baumjohann, W., Magnes, W., Fischer, D., Eichelberger, H. U., Torbert, R. B., Russell, C. T., Strangeway, R. J., Leinweber, H. K., Le, G., Bromund, K. R., Anderson, B. J., Slavin, J. A., Kepko, E. L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4949994/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27478286
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2016GL069520
_version_ 1782443506713755648
author Schmid, D.
Nakamura, R.
Volwerk, M.
Plaschke, F.
Narita, Y.
Baumjohann, W.
Magnes, W.
Fischer, D.
Eichelberger, H. U.
Torbert, R. B.
Russell, C. T.
Strangeway, R. J.
Leinweber, H. K.
Le, G.
Bromund, K. R.
Anderson, B. J.
Slavin, J. A.
Kepko, E. L.
author_facet Schmid, D.
Nakamura, R.
Volwerk, M.
Plaschke, F.
Narita, Y.
Baumjohann, W.
Magnes, W.
Fischer, D.
Eichelberger, H. U.
Torbert, R. B.
Russell, C. T.
Strangeway, R. J.
Leinweber, H. K.
Le, G.
Bromund, K. R.
Anderson, B. J.
Slavin, J. A.
Kepko, E. L.
author_sort Schmid, D.
collection PubMed
description We present a statistical study of dipolarization fronts (DFs), using magnetic field data from MMS and Cluster, at radial distances below 12 R (E) and 20 R (E), respectively. Assuming that the DFs have a semicircular cross section and are propelled by the magnetic tension force, we used multispacecraft observations to determine the DF velocities. About three quarters of the DFs propagate earthward and about one quarter tailward. Generally, MMS is in a more dipolar magnetic field region and observes larger‐amplitude DFs than Cluster. The major findings obtained in this study are as follows: (1) At MMS ∼57 % of the DFs move faster than 150 km/s, while at Cluster only ∼35 %, indicating a variable flux transport rate inside the flow‐braking region. (2) Larger DF velocities correspond to higher B (z) values directly ahead of the DFs. We interpret this as a snow plow‐like phenomenon, resulting from a higher magnetic flux pileup ahead of DFs with higher velocities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4949994
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49499942016-07-28 A comparative study of dipolarization fronts at MMS and Cluster Schmid, D. Nakamura, R. Volwerk, M. Plaschke, F. Narita, Y. Baumjohann, W. Magnes, W. Fischer, D. Eichelberger, H. U. Torbert, R. B. Russell, C. T. Strangeway, R. J. Leinweber, H. K. Le, G. Bromund, K. R. Anderson, B. J. Slavin, J. A. Kepko, E. L. Geophys Res Lett Research Letters We present a statistical study of dipolarization fronts (DFs), using magnetic field data from MMS and Cluster, at radial distances below 12 R (E) and 20 R (E), respectively. Assuming that the DFs have a semicircular cross section and are propelled by the magnetic tension force, we used multispacecraft observations to determine the DF velocities. About three quarters of the DFs propagate earthward and about one quarter tailward. Generally, MMS is in a more dipolar magnetic field region and observes larger‐amplitude DFs than Cluster. The major findings obtained in this study are as follows: (1) At MMS ∼57 % of the DFs move faster than 150 km/s, while at Cluster only ∼35 %, indicating a variable flux transport rate inside the flow‐braking region. (2) Larger DF velocities correspond to higher B (z) values directly ahead of the DFs. We interpret this as a snow plow‐like phenomenon, resulting from a higher magnetic flux pileup ahead of DFs with higher velocities. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-06-25 2016-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4949994/ /pubmed/27478286 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2016GL069520 Text en ©2016. The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Letters
Schmid, D.
Nakamura, R.
Volwerk, M.
Plaschke, F.
Narita, Y.
Baumjohann, W.
Magnes, W.
Fischer, D.
Eichelberger, H. U.
Torbert, R. B.
Russell, C. T.
Strangeway, R. J.
Leinweber, H. K.
Le, G.
Bromund, K. R.
Anderson, B. J.
Slavin, J. A.
Kepko, E. L.
A comparative study of dipolarization fronts at MMS and Cluster
title A comparative study of dipolarization fronts at MMS and Cluster
title_full A comparative study of dipolarization fronts at MMS and Cluster
title_fullStr A comparative study of dipolarization fronts at MMS and Cluster
title_full_unstemmed A comparative study of dipolarization fronts at MMS and Cluster
title_short A comparative study of dipolarization fronts at MMS and Cluster
title_sort comparative study of dipolarization fronts at mms and cluster
topic Research Letters
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4949994/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27478286
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2016GL069520
work_keys_str_mv AT schmidd acomparativestudyofdipolarizationfrontsatmmsandcluster
AT nakamurar acomparativestudyofdipolarizationfrontsatmmsandcluster
AT volwerkm acomparativestudyofdipolarizationfrontsatmmsandcluster
AT plaschkef acomparativestudyofdipolarizationfrontsatmmsandcluster
AT naritay acomparativestudyofdipolarizationfrontsatmmsandcluster
AT baumjohannw acomparativestudyofdipolarizationfrontsatmmsandcluster
AT magnesw acomparativestudyofdipolarizationfrontsatmmsandcluster
AT fischerd acomparativestudyofdipolarizationfrontsatmmsandcluster
AT eichelbergerhu acomparativestudyofdipolarizationfrontsatmmsandcluster
AT torbertrb acomparativestudyofdipolarizationfrontsatmmsandcluster
AT russellct acomparativestudyofdipolarizationfrontsatmmsandcluster
AT strangewayrj acomparativestudyofdipolarizationfrontsatmmsandcluster
AT leinweberhk acomparativestudyofdipolarizationfrontsatmmsandcluster
AT leg acomparativestudyofdipolarizationfrontsatmmsandcluster
AT bromundkr acomparativestudyofdipolarizationfrontsatmmsandcluster
AT andersonbj acomparativestudyofdipolarizationfrontsatmmsandcluster
AT slavinja acomparativestudyofdipolarizationfrontsatmmsandcluster
AT kepkoel acomparativestudyofdipolarizationfrontsatmmsandcluster
AT schmidd comparativestudyofdipolarizationfrontsatmmsandcluster
AT nakamurar comparativestudyofdipolarizationfrontsatmmsandcluster
AT volwerkm comparativestudyofdipolarizationfrontsatmmsandcluster
AT plaschkef comparativestudyofdipolarizationfrontsatmmsandcluster
AT naritay comparativestudyofdipolarizationfrontsatmmsandcluster
AT baumjohannw comparativestudyofdipolarizationfrontsatmmsandcluster
AT magnesw comparativestudyofdipolarizationfrontsatmmsandcluster
AT fischerd comparativestudyofdipolarizationfrontsatmmsandcluster
AT eichelbergerhu comparativestudyofdipolarizationfrontsatmmsandcluster
AT torbertrb comparativestudyofdipolarizationfrontsatmmsandcluster
AT russellct comparativestudyofdipolarizationfrontsatmmsandcluster
AT strangewayrj comparativestudyofdipolarizationfrontsatmmsandcluster
AT leinweberhk comparativestudyofdipolarizationfrontsatmmsandcluster
AT leg comparativestudyofdipolarizationfrontsatmmsandcluster
AT bromundkr comparativestudyofdipolarizationfrontsatmmsandcluster
AT andersonbj comparativestudyofdipolarizationfrontsatmmsandcluster
AT slavinja comparativestudyofdipolarizationfrontsatmmsandcluster
AT kepkoel comparativestudyofdipolarizationfrontsatmmsandcluster