Cargando…
A comparative study of dipolarization fronts at MMS and Cluster
We present a statistical study of dipolarization fronts (DFs), using magnetic field data from MMS and Cluster, at radial distances below 12 R (E) and 20 R (E), respectively. Assuming that the DFs have a semicircular cross section and are propelled by the magnetic tension force, we used multispacecra...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4949994/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27478286 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2016GL069520 |
_version_ | 1782443506713755648 |
---|---|
author | Schmid, D. Nakamura, R. Volwerk, M. Plaschke, F. Narita, Y. Baumjohann, W. Magnes, W. Fischer, D. Eichelberger, H. U. Torbert, R. B. Russell, C. T. Strangeway, R. J. Leinweber, H. K. Le, G. Bromund, K. R. Anderson, B. J. Slavin, J. A. Kepko, E. L. |
author_facet | Schmid, D. Nakamura, R. Volwerk, M. Plaschke, F. Narita, Y. Baumjohann, W. Magnes, W. Fischer, D. Eichelberger, H. U. Torbert, R. B. Russell, C. T. Strangeway, R. J. Leinweber, H. K. Le, G. Bromund, K. R. Anderson, B. J. Slavin, J. A. Kepko, E. L. |
author_sort | Schmid, D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | We present a statistical study of dipolarization fronts (DFs), using magnetic field data from MMS and Cluster, at radial distances below 12 R (E) and 20 R (E), respectively. Assuming that the DFs have a semicircular cross section and are propelled by the magnetic tension force, we used multispacecraft observations to determine the DF velocities. About three quarters of the DFs propagate earthward and about one quarter tailward. Generally, MMS is in a more dipolar magnetic field region and observes larger‐amplitude DFs than Cluster. The major findings obtained in this study are as follows: (1) At MMS ∼57 % of the DFs move faster than 150 km/s, while at Cluster only ∼35 %, indicating a variable flux transport rate inside the flow‐braking region. (2) Larger DF velocities correspond to higher B (z) values directly ahead of the DFs. We interpret this as a snow plow‐like phenomenon, resulting from a higher magnetic flux pileup ahead of DFs with higher velocities. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4949994 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49499942016-07-28 A comparative study of dipolarization fronts at MMS and Cluster Schmid, D. Nakamura, R. Volwerk, M. Plaschke, F. Narita, Y. Baumjohann, W. Magnes, W. Fischer, D. Eichelberger, H. U. Torbert, R. B. Russell, C. T. Strangeway, R. J. Leinweber, H. K. Le, G. Bromund, K. R. Anderson, B. J. Slavin, J. A. Kepko, E. L. Geophys Res Lett Research Letters We present a statistical study of dipolarization fronts (DFs), using magnetic field data from MMS and Cluster, at radial distances below 12 R (E) and 20 R (E), respectively. Assuming that the DFs have a semicircular cross section and are propelled by the magnetic tension force, we used multispacecraft observations to determine the DF velocities. About three quarters of the DFs propagate earthward and about one quarter tailward. Generally, MMS is in a more dipolar magnetic field region and observes larger‐amplitude DFs than Cluster. The major findings obtained in this study are as follows: (1) At MMS ∼57 % of the DFs move faster than 150 km/s, while at Cluster only ∼35 %, indicating a variable flux transport rate inside the flow‐braking region. (2) Larger DF velocities correspond to higher B (z) values directly ahead of the DFs. We interpret this as a snow plow‐like phenomenon, resulting from a higher magnetic flux pileup ahead of DFs with higher velocities. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-06-25 2016-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4949994/ /pubmed/27478286 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2016GL069520 Text en ©2016. The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Letters Schmid, D. Nakamura, R. Volwerk, M. Plaschke, F. Narita, Y. Baumjohann, W. Magnes, W. Fischer, D. Eichelberger, H. U. Torbert, R. B. Russell, C. T. Strangeway, R. J. Leinweber, H. K. Le, G. Bromund, K. R. Anderson, B. J. Slavin, J. A. Kepko, E. L. A comparative study of dipolarization fronts at MMS and Cluster |
title | A comparative study of dipolarization fronts at MMS and Cluster |
title_full | A comparative study of dipolarization fronts at MMS and Cluster |
title_fullStr | A comparative study of dipolarization fronts at MMS and Cluster |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparative study of dipolarization fronts at MMS and Cluster |
title_short | A comparative study of dipolarization fronts at MMS and Cluster |
title_sort | comparative study of dipolarization fronts at mms and cluster |
topic | Research Letters |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4949994/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27478286 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2016GL069520 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schmidd acomparativestudyofdipolarizationfrontsatmmsandcluster AT nakamurar acomparativestudyofdipolarizationfrontsatmmsandcluster AT volwerkm acomparativestudyofdipolarizationfrontsatmmsandcluster AT plaschkef acomparativestudyofdipolarizationfrontsatmmsandcluster AT naritay acomparativestudyofdipolarizationfrontsatmmsandcluster AT baumjohannw acomparativestudyofdipolarizationfrontsatmmsandcluster AT magnesw acomparativestudyofdipolarizationfrontsatmmsandcluster AT fischerd acomparativestudyofdipolarizationfrontsatmmsandcluster AT eichelbergerhu acomparativestudyofdipolarizationfrontsatmmsandcluster AT torbertrb acomparativestudyofdipolarizationfrontsatmmsandcluster AT russellct acomparativestudyofdipolarizationfrontsatmmsandcluster AT strangewayrj acomparativestudyofdipolarizationfrontsatmmsandcluster AT leinweberhk acomparativestudyofdipolarizationfrontsatmmsandcluster AT leg acomparativestudyofdipolarizationfrontsatmmsandcluster AT bromundkr acomparativestudyofdipolarizationfrontsatmmsandcluster AT andersonbj acomparativestudyofdipolarizationfrontsatmmsandcluster AT slavinja acomparativestudyofdipolarizationfrontsatmmsandcluster AT kepkoel acomparativestudyofdipolarizationfrontsatmmsandcluster AT schmidd comparativestudyofdipolarizationfrontsatmmsandcluster AT nakamurar comparativestudyofdipolarizationfrontsatmmsandcluster AT volwerkm comparativestudyofdipolarizationfrontsatmmsandcluster AT plaschkef comparativestudyofdipolarizationfrontsatmmsandcluster AT naritay comparativestudyofdipolarizationfrontsatmmsandcluster AT baumjohannw comparativestudyofdipolarizationfrontsatmmsandcluster AT magnesw comparativestudyofdipolarizationfrontsatmmsandcluster AT fischerd comparativestudyofdipolarizationfrontsatmmsandcluster AT eichelbergerhu comparativestudyofdipolarizationfrontsatmmsandcluster AT torbertrb comparativestudyofdipolarizationfrontsatmmsandcluster AT russellct comparativestudyofdipolarizationfrontsatmmsandcluster AT strangewayrj comparativestudyofdipolarizationfrontsatmmsandcluster AT leinweberhk comparativestudyofdipolarizationfrontsatmmsandcluster AT leg comparativestudyofdipolarizationfrontsatmmsandcluster AT bromundkr comparativestudyofdipolarizationfrontsatmmsandcluster AT andersonbj comparativestudyofdipolarizationfrontsatmmsandcluster AT slavinja comparativestudyofdipolarizationfrontsatmmsandcluster AT kepkoel comparativestudyofdipolarizationfrontsatmmsandcluster |