Cargando…

Assessment of pupillary light reflex using a smartphone application

In unconscious patients, pupillary light reflex is an indicator of brain damage. In the current study, a smartphone application was developed for the purpose of measuring pupillary light reflex with an aim to determine the agreement between pupillary light reflex measurements using a smartphone appl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shin, Young Duck, Bae, Jin Ho, Kwon, Eun Jung, Kim, Hyeon Tae, Lee, Tae-Soo, Choi, Young Jin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: D.A. Spandidos 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4950215/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27446266
http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/etm.2016.3379
_version_ 1782443542388408320
author Shin, Young Duck
Bae, Jin Ho
Kwon, Eun Jung
Kim, Hyeon Tae
Lee, Tae-Soo
Choi, Young Jin
author_facet Shin, Young Duck
Bae, Jin Ho
Kwon, Eun Jung
Kim, Hyeon Tae
Lee, Tae-Soo
Choi, Young Jin
author_sort Shin, Young Duck
collection PubMed
description In unconscious patients, pupillary light reflex is an indicator of brain damage. In the current study, a smartphone application was developed for the purpose of measuring pupillary light reflex with an aim to determine the agreement between pupillary light reflex measurements using a smartphone application (APP) and a penlight (PEN). The APP acquires five sequential photographs using the camera flash in order to stimulate the pupil. The initial image is captured prior to the flash, and the subsequent image is obtained while the flash is on. The remaining three images are captured whilst the flash is off. Pupillary right reflex was assessed in 30 healthy subjects using a PEN. After 10 min, the examiners inspected the images of light reflex acquired from the same subjects using the APP, and completed the corresponding questionnaire containing details of pupil size and degree of response. Agreement between the two assessment methods was determined by calculating bias, limits of agreement, and the intraclass correlation (ICC) coefficient. A statistically significant difference was not observed between the two methods regarding pupil size and degree of response. Bias was 0.1 mm and limits of agreement were ±1.5 mm, as compared with PEN. ICC was 0.93 (95% confidence interval, 0.89–0.96). Therefore, it may be concluded that the results of pupillary light reflex assessed by PEN and APP display no significant difference. Furthermore, the APP provides advantages such as portability, objectivity and the possibility of being used as objective medical evidence.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4950215
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher D.A. Spandidos
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49502152016-07-21 Assessment of pupillary light reflex using a smartphone application Shin, Young Duck Bae, Jin Ho Kwon, Eun Jung Kim, Hyeon Tae Lee, Tae-Soo Choi, Young Jin Exp Ther Med Articles In unconscious patients, pupillary light reflex is an indicator of brain damage. In the current study, a smartphone application was developed for the purpose of measuring pupillary light reflex with an aim to determine the agreement between pupillary light reflex measurements using a smartphone application (APP) and a penlight (PEN). The APP acquires five sequential photographs using the camera flash in order to stimulate the pupil. The initial image is captured prior to the flash, and the subsequent image is obtained while the flash is on. The remaining three images are captured whilst the flash is off. Pupillary right reflex was assessed in 30 healthy subjects using a PEN. After 10 min, the examiners inspected the images of light reflex acquired from the same subjects using the APP, and completed the corresponding questionnaire containing details of pupil size and degree of response. Agreement between the two assessment methods was determined by calculating bias, limits of agreement, and the intraclass correlation (ICC) coefficient. A statistically significant difference was not observed between the two methods regarding pupil size and degree of response. Bias was 0.1 mm and limits of agreement were ±1.5 mm, as compared with PEN. ICC was 0.93 (95% confidence interval, 0.89–0.96). Therefore, it may be concluded that the results of pupillary light reflex assessed by PEN and APP display no significant difference. Furthermore, the APP provides advantages such as portability, objectivity and the possibility of being used as objective medical evidence. D.A. Spandidos 2016-08 2016-05-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4950215/ /pubmed/27446266 http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/etm.2016.3379 Text en Copyright: © Shin et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Articles
Shin, Young Duck
Bae, Jin Ho
Kwon, Eun Jung
Kim, Hyeon Tae
Lee, Tae-Soo
Choi, Young Jin
Assessment of pupillary light reflex using a smartphone application
title Assessment of pupillary light reflex using a smartphone application
title_full Assessment of pupillary light reflex using a smartphone application
title_fullStr Assessment of pupillary light reflex using a smartphone application
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of pupillary light reflex using a smartphone application
title_short Assessment of pupillary light reflex using a smartphone application
title_sort assessment of pupillary light reflex using a smartphone application
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4950215/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27446266
http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/etm.2016.3379
work_keys_str_mv AT shinyoungduck assessmentofpupillarylightreflexusingasmartphoneapplication
AT baejinho assessmentofpupillarylightreflexusingasmartphoneapplication
AT kwoneunjung assessmentofpupillarylightreflexusingasmartphoneapplication
AT kimhyeontae assessmentofpupillarylightreflexusingasmartphoneapplication
AT leetaesoo assessmentofpupillarylightreflexusingasmartphoneapplication
AT choiyoungjin assessmentofpupillarylightreflexusingasmartphoneapplication