Cargando…
Assessment of pupillary light reflex using a smartphone application
In unconscious patients, pupillary light reflex is an indicator of brain damage. In the current study, a smartphone application was developed for the purpose of measuring pupillary light reflex with an aim to determine the agreement between pupillary light reflex measurements using a smartphone appl...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
D.A. Spandidos
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4950215/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27446266 http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/etm.2016.3379 |
_version_ | 1782443542388408320 |
---|---|
author | Shin, Young Duck Bae, Jin Ho Kwon, Eun Jung Kim, Hyeon Tae Lee, Tae-Soo Choi, Young Jin |
author_facet | Shin, Young Duck Bae, Jin Ho Kwon, Eun Jung Kim, Hyeon Tae Lee, Tae-Soo Choi, Young Jin |
author_sort | Shin, Young Duck |
collection | PubMed |
description | In unconscious patients, pupillary light reflex is an indicator of brain damage. In the current study, a smartphone application was developed for the purpose of measuring pupillary light reflex with an aim to determine the agreement between pupillary light reflex measurements using a smartphone application (APP) and a penlight (PEN). The APP acquires five sequential photographs using the camera flash in order to stimulate the pupil. The initial image is captured prior to the flash, and the subsequent image is obtained while the flash is on. The remaining three images are captured whilst the flash is off. Pupillary right reflex was assessed in 30 healthy subjects using a PEN. After 10 min, the examiners inspected the images of light reflex acquired from the same subjects using the APP, and completed the corresponding questionnaire containing details of pupil size and degree of response. Agreement between the two assessment methods was determined by calculating bias, limits of agreement, and the intraclass correlation (ICC) coefficient. A statistically significant difference was not observed between the two methods regarding pupil size and degree of response. Bias was 0.1 mm and limits of agreement were ±1.5 mm, as compared with PEN. ICC was 0.93 (95% confidence interval, 0.89–0.96). Therefore, it may be concluded that the results of pupillary light reflex assessed by PEN and APP display no significant difference. Furthermore, the APP provides advantages such as portability, objectivity and the possibility of being used as objective medical evidence. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4950215 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | D.A. Spandidos |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49502152016-07-21 Assessment of pupillary light reflex using a smartphone application Shin, Young Duck Bae, Jin Ho Kwon, Eun Jung Kim, Hyeon Tae Lee, Tae-Soo Choi, Young Jin Exp Ther Med Articles In unconscious patients, pupillary light reflex is an indicator of brain damage. In the current study, a smartphone application was developed for the purpose of measuring pupillary light reflex with an aim to determine the agreement between pupillary light reflex measurements using a smartphone application (APP) and a penlight (PEN). The APP acquires five sequential photographs using the camera flash in order to stimulate the pupil. The initial image is captured prior to the flash, and the subsequent image is obtained while the flash is on. The remaining three images are captured whilst the flash is off. Pupillary right reflex was assessed in 30 healthy subjects using a PEN. After 10 min, the examiners inspected the images of light reflex acquired from the same subjects using the APP, and completed the corresponding questionnaire containing details of pupil size and degree of response. Agreement between the two assessment methods was determined by calculating bias, limits of agreement, and the intraclass correlation (ICC) coefficient. A statistically significant difference was not observed between the two methods regarding pupil size and degree of response. Bias was 0.1 mm and limits of agreement were ±1.5 mm, as compared with PEN. ICC was 0.93 (95% confidence interval, 0.89–0.96). Therefore, it may be concluded that the results of pupillary light reflex assessed by PEN and APP display no significant difference. Furthermore, the APP provides advantages such as portability, objectivity and the possibility of being used as objective medical evidence. D.A. Spandidos 2016-08 2016-05-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4950215/ /pubmed/27446266 http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/etm.2016.3379 Text en Copyright: © Shin et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Articles Shin, Young Duck Bae, Jin Ho Kwon, Eun Jung Kim, Hyeon Tae Lee, Tae-Soo Choi, Young Jin Assessment of pupillary light reflex using a smartphone application |
title | Assessment of pupillary light reflex using a smartphone application |
title_full | Assessment of pupillary light reflex using a smartphone application |
title_fullStr | Assessment of pupillary light reflex using a smartphone application |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessment of pupillary light reflex using a smartphone application |
title_short | Assessment of pupillary light reflex using a smartphone application |
title_sort | assessment of pupillary light reflex using a smartphone application |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4950215/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27446266 http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/etm.2016.3379 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shinyoungduck assessmentofpupillarylightreflexusingasmartphoneapplication AT baejinho assessmentofpupillarylightreflexusingasmartphoneapplication AT kwoneunjung assessmentofpupillarylightreflexusingasmartphoneapplication AT kimhyeontae assessmentofpupillarylightreflexusingasmartphoneapplication AT leetaesoo assessmentofpupillarylightreflexusingasmartphoneapplication AT choiyoungjin assessmentofpupillarylightreflexusingasmartphoneapplication |