Cargando…

Applicability of the ReproQ client experiences questionnaire for quality improvement in maternity care

Background. The ReproQuestionnaire (ReproQ) measures the client’s experience with maternity care, following the WHO responsiveness model. In 2015, the ReproQ was appointed as national client experience questionnaire and will be added to the national list of indicators in maternity care. For using th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Scheerhagen, Marisja, van Stel, Henk F., Tholhuijsen, Dominique J.C., Birnie, Erwin, Franx, Arie, Bonsel, Gouke J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4950561/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27478690
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2092
_version_ 1782443574588080128
author Scheerhagen, Marisja
van Stel, Henk F.
Tholhuijsen, Dominique J.C.
Birnie, Erwin
Franx, Arie
Bonsel, Gouke J.
author_facet Scheerhagen, Marisja
van Stel, Henk F.
Tholhuijsen, Dominique J.C.
Birnie, Erwin
Franx, Arie
Bonsel, Gouke J.
author_sort Scheerhagen, Marisja
collection PubMed
description Background. The ReproQuestionnaire (ReproQ) measures the client’s experience with maternity care, following the WHO responsiveness model. In 2015, the ReproQ was appointed as national client experience questionnaire and will be added to the national list of indicators in maternity care. For using the ReproQ in quality improvement, the questionnaire should be able to identify best and worst practices. To achieve this, ReproQ should be reliable and able to identify relevant differences. Methods and Findings. We sent questionnaires to 17,867 women six weeks after labor (response 32%). Additionally, we invited 915 women for the retest (response 29%). Next we determined the test–retest reliability, the Minimally Important Difference (MID) and six known group comparisons, using two scorings methods: the percentage women with at least one negative experience and the mean score. The reliability for the percentage negative experience and mean score was both ‘good’ (Absolute agreement = 79%; intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.78). The MID was 11% for the percentage negative and 0.15 for the mean score. Application of the MIDs revealed relevant differences in women’s experience with regard to professional continuity, setting continuity and having travel time. Conclusions. The measurement characteristics of the ReproQ support its use in quality improvement cycle. Test–retest reliability was good, and the observed minimal important difference allows for discrimination of good and poor performers, also at the level of specific features of performance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4950561
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49505612016-07-29 Applicability of the ReproQ client experiences questionnaire for quality improvement in maternity care Scheerhagen, Marisja van Stel, Henk F. Tholhuijsen, Dominique J.C. Birnie, Erwin Franx, Arie Bonsel, Gouke J. PeerJ Gynecology and Obstetrics Background. The ReproQuestionnaire (ReproQ) measures the client’s experience with maternity care, following the WHO responsiveness model. In 2015, the ReproQ was appointed as national client experience questionnaire and will be added to the national list of indicators in maternity care. For using the ReproQ in quality improvement, the questionnaire should be able to identify best and worst practices. To achieve this, ReproQ should be reliable and able to identify relevant differences. Methods and Findings. We sent questionnaires to 17,867 women six weeks after labor (response 32%). Additionally, we invited 915 women for the retest (response 29%). Next we determined the test–retest reliability, the Minimally Important Difference (MID) and six known group comparisons, using two scorings methods: the percentage women with at least one negative experience and the mean score. The reliability for the percentage negative experience and mean score was both ‘good’ (Absolute agreement = 79%; intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.78). The MID was 11% for the percentage negative and 0.15 for the mean score. Application of the MIDs revealed relevant differences in women’s experience with regard to professional continuity, setting continuity and having travel time. Conclusions. The measurement characteristics of the ReproQ support its use in quality improvement cycle. Test–retest reliability was good, and the observed minimal important difference allows for discrimination of good and poor performers, also at the level of specific features of performance. PeerJ Inc. 2016-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4950561/ /pubmed/27478690 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2092 Text en ©2016 Scheerhagen et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Gynecology and Obstetrics
Scheerhagen, Marisja
van Stel, Henk F.
Tholhuijsen, Dominique J.C.
Birnie, Erwin
Franx, Arie
Bonsel, Gouke J.
Applicability of the ReproQ client experiences questionnaire for quality improvement in maternity care
title Applicability of the ReproQ client experiences questionnaire for quality improvement in maternity care
title_full Applicability of the ReproQ client experiences questionnaire for quality improvement in maternity care
title_fullStr Applicability of the ReproQ client experiences questionnaire for quality improvement in maternity care
title_full_unstemmed Applicability of the ReproQ client experiences questionnaire for quality improvement in maternity care
title_short Applicability of the ReproQ client experiences questionnaire for quality improvement in maternity care
title_sort applicability of the reproq client experiences questionnaire for quality improvement in maternity care
topic Gynecology and Obstetrics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4950561/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27478690
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2092
work_keys_str_mv AT scheerhagenmarisja applicabilityofthereproqclientexperiencesquestionnaireforqualityimprovementinmaternitycare
AT vanstelhenkf applicabilityofthereproqclientexperiencesquestionnaireforqualityimprovementinmaternitycare
AT tholhuijsendominiquejc applicabilityofthereproqclientexperiencesquestionnaireforqualityimprovementinmaternitycare
AT birnieerwin applicabilityofthereproqclientexperiencesquestionnaireforqualityimprovementinmaternitycare
AT franxarie applicabilityofthereproqclientexperiencesquestionnaireforqualityimprovementinmaternitycare
AT bonselgoukej applicabilityofthereproqclientexperiencesquestionnaireforqualityimprovementinmaternitycare