Cargando…
Applicability of the ReproQ client experiences questionnaire for quality improvement in maternity care
Background. The ReproQuestionnaire (ReproQ) measures the client’s experience with maternity care, following the WHO responsiveness model. In 2015, the ReproQ was appointed as national client experience questionnaire and will be added to the national list of indicators in maternity care. For using th...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
PeerJ Inc.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4950561/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27478690 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2092 |
_version_ | 1782443574588080128 |
---|---|
author | Scheerhagen, Marisja van Stel, Henk F. Tholhuijsen, Dominique J.C. Birnie, Erwin Franx, Arie Bonsel, Gouke J. |
author_facet | Scheerhagen, Marisja van Stel, Henk F. Tholhuijsen, Dominique J.C. Birnie, Erwin Franx, Arie Bonsel, Gouke J. |
author_sort | Scheerhagen, Marisja |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background. The ReproQuestionnaire (ReproQ) measures the client’s experience with maternity care, following the WHO responsiveness model. In 2015, the ReproQ was appointed as national client experience questionnaire and will be added to the national list of indicators in maternity care. For using the ReproQ in quality improvement, the questionnaire should be able to identify best and worst practices. To achieve this, ReproQ should be reliable and able to identify relevant differences. Methods and Findings. We sent questionnaires to 17,867 women six weeks after labor (response 32%). Additionally, we invited 915 women for the retest (response 29%). Next we determined the test–retest reliability, the Minimally Important Difference (MID) and six known group comparisons, using two scorings methods: the percentage women with at least one negative experience and the mean score. The reliability for the percentage negative experience and mean score was both ‘good’ (Absolute agreement = 79%; intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.78). The MID was 11% for the percentage negative and 0.15 for the mean score. Application of the MIDs revealed relevant differences in women’s experience with regard to professional continuity, setting continuity and having travel time. Conclusions. The measurement characteristics of the ReproQ support its use in quality improvement cycle. Test–retest reliability was good, and the observed minimal important difference allows for discrimination of good and poor performers, also at the level of specific features of performance. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4950561 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | PeerJ Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49505612016-07-29 Applicability of the ReproQ client experiences questionnaire for quality improvement in maternity care Scheerhagen, Marisja van Stel, Henk F. Tholhuijsen, Dominique J.C. Birnie, Erwin Franx, Arie Bonsel, Gouke J. PeerJ Gynecology and Obstetrics Background. The ReproQuestionnaire (ReproQ) measures the client’s experience with maternity care, following the WHO responsiveness model. In 2015, the ReproQ was appointed as national client experience questionnaire and will be added to the national list of indicators in maternity care. For using the ReproQ in quality improvement, the questionnaire should be able to identify best and worst practices. To achieve this, ReproQ should be reliable and able to identify relevant differences. Methods and Findings. We sent questionnaires to 17,867 women six weeks after labor (response 32%). Additionally, we invited 915 women for the retest (response 29%). Next we determined the test–retest reliability, the Minimally Important Difference (MID) and six known group comparisons, using two scorings methods: the percentage women with at least one negative experience and the mean score. The reliability for the percentage negative experience and mean score was both ‘good’ (Absolute agreement = 79%; intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.78). The MID was 11% for the percentage negative and 0.15 for the mean score. Application of the MIDs revealed relevant differences in women’s experience with regard to professional continuity, setting continuity and having travel time. Conclusions. The measurement characteristics of the ReproQ support its use in quality improvement cycle. Test–retest reliability was good, and the observed minimal important difference allows for discrimination of good and poor performers, also at the level of specific features of performance. PeerJ Inc. 2016-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4950561/ /pubmed/27478690 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2092 Text en ©2016 Scheerhagen et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited. |
spellingShingle | Gynecology and Obstetrics Scheerhagen, Marisja van Stel, Henk F. Tholhuijsen, Dominique J.C. Birnie, Erwin Franx, Arie Bonsel, Gouke J. Applicability of the ReproQ client experiences questionnaire for quality improvement in maternity care |
title | Applicability of the ReproQ client experiences questionnaire for quality improvement in maternity care |
title_full | Applicability of the ReproQ client experiences questionnaire for quality improvement in maternity care |
title_fullStr | Applicability of the ReproQ client experiences questionnaire for quality improvement in maternity care |
title_full_unstemmed | Applicability of the ReproQ client experiences questionnaire for quality improvement in maternity care |
title_short | Applicability of the ReproQ client experiences questionnaire for quality improvement in maternity care |
title_sort | applicability of the reproq client experiences questionnaire for quality improvement in maternity care |
topic | Gynecology and Obstetrics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4950561/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27478690 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2092 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT scheerhagenmarisja applicabilityofthereproqclientexperiencesquestionnaireforqualityimprovementinmaternitycare AT vanstelhenkf applicabilityofthereproqclientexperiencesquestionnaireforqualityimprovementinmaternitycare AT tholhuijsendominiquejc applicabilityofthereproqclientexperiencesquestionnaireforqualityimprovementinmaternitycare AT birnieerwin applicabilityofthereproqclientexperiencesquestionnaireforqualityimprovementinmaternitycare AT franxarie applicabilityofthereproqclientexperiencesquestionnaireforqualityimprovementinmaternitycare AT bonselgoukej applicabilityofthereproqclientexperiencesquestionnaireforqualityimprovementinmaternitycare |