Cargando…

Antimicrobial prophylaxis in caesarean section delivery

Antimicrobial prophylaxis is used routinely for pre-, intra- and post-operative caesarean section. One of the most important risk factors for postpartum infection is caesarean delivery. Caesarean section shows a higher incidence of infection than vaginal delivery. It is complicated by surgical site...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Ronghua, Lin, Lin, Wang, Dujuan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: D.A. Spandidos 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4950587/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27446303
http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/etm.2016.3350
_version_ 1782443578440548352
author Liu, Ronghua
Lin, Lin
Wang, Dujuan
author_facet Liu, Ronghua
Lin, Lin
Wang, Dujuan
author_sort Liu, Ronghua
collection PubMed
description Antimicrobial prophylaxis is used routinely for pre-, intra- and post-operative caesarean section. One of the most important risk factors for postpartum infection is caesarean delivery. Caesarean section shows a higher incidence of infection than vaginal delivery. It is complicated by surgical site infections, endometritis or urinary tract infection. The aim of the present study was to assess the usage of antimicrobials in women undergoing caesarean section at a Tertiary Care Hospital. A prospective study was conducted in 100 women during the period of February 2013 to August 2013 in the inpatient Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics. Data collected included the age of the patient, gravidity, and type of caesarean section, which was analyzed for the nature and number of antimicrobials prescribed, duration of treatment, polypharmacy, fixed-dose combinations, generic/brand names used and failure of prophylaxis. Antimicrobial prophylaxis was administered to the patients. The most commonly prescribed antimicrobial was a combination of ceftriaxone and sulbactam. Of 100 patients, 87% were aged 20–35 years. The highest proportion of patients were primigravida 72%. Elective procedure was carried out in 38%, the remaining were emergency C-section in whom intra- and post-operative antimicrobial prophylaxis was given for a duration of 7 days. In total, 27% of patients were reported with infection even after the antimicrobial prophylaxis. In conclusion, pre-operative prophylaxis was given in the early rupture of membranes. Fixed-dose combinations were preferred. Incidence of infection even after antimicrobial prophylaxis was reported due to pre-existing infection, debilitating disease or prolonged rupture of membranes. Patients with recurrent infection were shifted to amoxicillin and clavulinic acid combination. Drugs were prescribed only by brand names which is of concern.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4950587
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher D.A. Spandidos
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49505872016-07-21 Antimicrobial prophylaxis in caesarean section delivery Liu, Ronghua Lin, Lin Wang, Dujuan Exp Ther Med Articles Antimicrobial prophylaxis is used routinely for pre-, intra- and post-operative caesarean section. One of the most important risk factors for postpartum infection is caesarean delivery. Caesarean section shows a higher incidence of infection than vaginal delivery. It is complicated by surgical site infections, endometritis or urinary tract infection. The aim of the present study was to assess the usage of antimicrobials in women undergoing caesarean section at a Tertiary Care Hospital. A prospective study was conducted in 100 women during the period of February 2013 to August 2013 in the inpatient Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics. Data collected included the age of the patient, gravidity, and type of caesarean section, which was analyzed for the nature and number of antimicrobials prescribed, duration of treatment, polypharmacy, fixed-dose combinations, generic/brand names used and failure of prophylaxis. Antimicrobial prophylaxis was administered to the patients. The most commonly prescribed antimicrobial was a combination of ceftriaxone and sulbactam. Of 100 patients, 87% were aged 20–35 years. The highest proportion of patients were primigravida 72%. Elective procedure was carried out in 38%, the remaining were emergency C-section in whom intra- and post-operative antimicrobial prophylaxis was given for a duration of 7 days. In total, 27% of patients were reported with infection even after the antimicrobial prophylaxis. In conclusion, pre-operative prophylaxis was given in the early rupture of membranes. Fixed-dose combinations were preferred. Incidence of infection even after antimicrobial prophylaxis was reported due to pre-existing infection, debilitating disease or prolonged rupture of membranes. Patients with recurrent infection were shifted to amoxicillin and clavulinic acid combination. Drugs were prescribed only by brand names which is of concern. D.A. Spandidos 2016-08 2016-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4950587/ /pubmed/27446303 http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/etm.2016.3350 Text en Copyright: © Liu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Articles
Liu, Ronghua
Lin, Lin
Wang, Dujuan
Antimicrobial prophylaxis in caesarean section delivery
title Antimicrobial prophylaxis in caesarean section delivery
title_full Antimicrobial prophylaxis in caesarean section delivery
title_fullStr Antimicrobial prophylaxis in caesarean section delivery
title_full_unstemmed Antimicrobial prophylaxis in caesarean section delivery
title_short Antimicrobial prophylaxis in caesarean section delivery
title_sort antimicrobial prophylaxis in caesarean section delivery
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4950587/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27446303
http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/etm.2016.3350
work_keys_str_mv AT liuronghua antimicrobialprophylaxisincaesareansectiondelivery
AT linlin antimicrobialprophylaxisincaesareansectiondelivery
AT wangdujuan antimicrobialprophylaxisincaesareansectiondelivery