Cargando…
Immune checkpoint inhibitors and response analysis: a tough challenge. A case report
BACKGROUND: Treatment of metastatic NSCLC patients with immune-checkpoint medicine is intriguing for the potential efficacy; however it may be difficult to evaluate the clinical response due to the lack of reliable immune-monitoring markers up to now and the possibility of radiological pseudo-progre...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4950698/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27431235 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-016-2153-9 |
_version_ | 1782443593909141504 |
---|---|
author | Bearz, Alessandra Perin, Tiziana Cancian, Luca Berto, Eleonora Sartor, Ivana Tirelli, Umberto |
author_facet | Bearz, Alessandra Perin, Tiziana Cancian, Luca Berto, Eleonora Sartor, Ivana Tirelli, Umberto |
author_sort | Bearz, Alessandra |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Treatment of metastatic NSCLC patients with immune-checkpoint medicine is intriguing for the potential efficacy; however it may be difficult to evaluate the clinical response due to the lack of reliable immune-monitoring markers up to now and the possibility of radiological pseudo-progression. CASE PRESENTATION: Herein we report the case of a patient ex-smoker with adenocarcinoma of the lung, stage IV for liver metastases, in progression after cisplatin-based chemotherapy and treated with antiPD-L1 (MPDL3802-Roche Genentech) e.v. every 3 weeks in a clinical trial. Treatment with antiPD-L1 was well tolerated and CT scan after 6 weeks of treatment showed stabilization of mediastinal lymph nodes, while progression of liver metastases; liver progression only was confirmed by further CT-scans. Patient was asymptomatic and it was unclear if we faced a pseudo-progression in the liver or a real progression. Data about his PDL1 expression were not available because the patient was in a clinical trial. Eventually a biopsy of the liver metastasis confirmed that there was a massive neoplastic invasion with tumor infiltrating lymphocytes <5 %. We stopped anti-PD-L1 therapy due to progression. CONCLUSION: Evaluation of response may be difficult with immune checkpoint inhibitors, in particular radiologic images may be a matter of debate; eventually we performed a biopsy to study tumor infiltrating lymphocytes to decide whether it was pseudo-progression or real progression. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4950698 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49506982016-07-20 Immune checkpoint inhibitors and response analysis: a tough challenge. A case report Bearz, Alessandra Perin, Tiziana Cancian, Luca Berto, Eleonora Sartor, Ivana Tirelli, Umberto BMC Res Notes Case Report BACKGROUND: Treatment of metastatic NSCLC patients with immune-checkpoint medicine is intriguing for the potential efficacy; however it may be difficult to evaluate the clinical response due to the lack of reliable immune-monitoring markers up to now and the possibility of radiological pseudo-progression. CASE PRESENTATION: Herein we report the case of a patient ex-smoker with adenocarcinoma of the lung, stage IV for liver metastases, in progression after cisplatin-based chemotherapy and treated with antiPD-L1 (MPDL3802-Roche Genentech) e.v. every 3 weeks in a clinical trial. Treatment with antiPD-L1 was well tolerated and CT scan after 6 weeks of treatment showed stabilization of mediastinal lymph nodes, while progression of liver metastases; liver progression only was confirmed by further CT-scans. Patient was asymptomatic and it was unclear if we faced a pseudo-progression in the liver or a real progression. Data about his PDL1 expression were not available because the patient was in a clinical trial. Eventually a biopsy of the liver metastasis confirmed that there was a massive neoplastic invasion with tumor infiltrating lymphocytes <5 %. We stopped anti-PD-L1 therapy due to progression. CONCLUSION: Evaluation of response may be difficult with immune checkpoint inhibitors, in particular radiologic images may be a matter of debate; eventually we performed a biopsy to study tumor infiltrating lymphocytes to decide whether it was pseudo-progression or real progression. BioMed Central 2016-07-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4950698/ /pubmed/27431235 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-016-2153-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Case Report Bearz, Alessandra Perin, Tiziana Cancian, Luca Berto, Eleonora Sartor, Ivana Tirelli, Umberto Immune checkpoint inhibitors and response analysis: a tough challenge. A case report |
title | Immune checkpoint inhibitors and response analysis: a tough challenge. A case report |
title_full | Immune checkpoint inhibitors and response analysis: a tough challenge. A case report |
title_fullStr | Immune checkpoint inhibitors and response analysis: a tough challenge. A case report |
title_full_unstemmed | Immune checkpoint inhibitors and response analysis: a tough challenge. A case report |
title_short | Immune checkpoint inhibitors and response analysis: a tough challenge. A case report |
title_sort | immune checkpoint inhibitors and response analysis: a tough challenge. a case report |
topic | Case Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4950698/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27431235 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-016-2153-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bearzalessandra immunecheckpointinhibitorsandresponseanalysisatoughchallengeacasereport AT perintiziana immunecheckpointinhibitorsandresponseanalysisatoughchallengeacasereport AT cancianluca immunecheckpointinhibitorsandresponseanalysisatoughchallengeacasereport AT bertoeleonora immunecheckpointinhibitorsandresponseanalysisatoughchallengeacasereport AT sartorivana immunecheckpointinhibitorsandresponseanalysisatoughchallengeacasereport AT tirelliumberto immunecheckpointinhibitorsandresponseanalysisatoughchallengeacasereport |