Cargando…

Immune checkpoint inhibitors and response analysis: a tough challenge. A case report

BACKGROUND: Treatment of metastatic NSCLC patients with immune-checkpoint medicine is intriguing for the potential efficacy; however it may be difficult to evaluate the clinical response due to the lack of reliable immune-monitoring markers up to now and the possibility of radiological pseudo-progre...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bearz, Alessandra, Perin, Tiziana, Cancian, Luca, Berto, Eleonora, Sartor, Ivana, Tirelli, Umberto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4950698/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27431235
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-016-2153-9
_version_ 1782443593909141504
author Bearz, Alessandra
Perin, Tiziana
Cancian, Luca
Berto, Eleonora
Sartor, Ivana
Tirelli, Umberto
author_facet Bearz, Alessandra
Perin, Tiziana
Cancian, Luca
Berto, Eleonora
Sartor, Ivana
Tirelli, Umberto
author_sort Bearz, Alessandra
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Treatment of metastatic NSCLC patients with immune-checkpoint medicine is intriguing for the potential efficacy; however it may be difficult to evaluate the clinical response due to the lack of reliable immune-monitoring markers up to now and the possibility of radiological pseudo-progression. CASE PRESENTATION: Herein we report the case of a patient ex-smoker with adenocarcinoma of the lung, stage IV for liver metastases, in progression after cisplatin-based chemotherapy and treated with antiPD-L1 (MPDL3802-Roche Genentech) e.v. every 3 weeks in a clinical trial. Treatment with antiPD-L1 was well tolerated and CT scan after 6 weeks of treatment showed stabilization of mediastinal lymph nodes, while progression of liver metastases; liver progression only was confirmed by further CT-scans. Patient was asymptomatic and it was unclear if we faced a pseudo-progression in the liver or a real progression. Data about his PDL1 expression were not available because the patient was in a clinical trial. Eventually a biopsy of the liver metastasis confirmed that there was a massive neoplastic invasion with tumor infiltrating lymphocytes <5 %. We stopped anti-PD-L1 therapy due to progression. CONCLUSION: Evaluation of response may be difficult with immune checkpoint inhibitors, in particular radiologic images may be a matter of debate; eventually we performed a biopsy to study tumor infiltrating lymphocytes to decide whether it was pseudo-progression or real progression.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4950698
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49506982016-07-20 Immune checkpoint inhibitors and response analysis: a tough challenge. A case report Bearz, Alessandra Perin, Tiziana Cancian, Luca Berto, Eleonora Sartor, Ivana Tirelli, Umberto BMC Res Notes Case Report BACKGROUND: Treatment of metastatic NSCLC patients with immune-checkpoint medicine is intriguing for the potential efficacy; however it may be difficult to evaluate the clinical response due to the lack of reliable immune-monitoring markers up to now and the possibility of radiological pseudo-progression. CASE PRESENTATION: Herein we report the case of a patient ex-smoker with adenocarcinoma of the lung, stage IV for liver metastases, in progression after cisplatin-based chemotherapy and treated with antiPD-L1 (MPDL3802-Roche Genentech) e.v. every 3 weeks in a clinical trial. Treatment with antiPD-L1 was well tolerated and CT scan after 6 weeks of treatment showed stabilization of mediastinal lymph nodes, while progression of liver metastases; liver progression only was confirmed by further CT-scans. Patient was asymptomatic and it was unclear if we faced a pseudo-progression in the liver or a real progression. Data about his PDL1 expression were not available because the patient was in a clinical trial. Eventually a biopsy of the liver metastasis confirmed that there was a massive neoplastic invasion with tumor infiltrating lymphocytes <5 %. We stopped anti-PD-L1 therapy due to progression. CONCLUSION: Evaluation of response may be difficult with immune checkpoint inhibitors, in particular radiologic images may be a matter of debate; eventually we performed a biopsy to study tumor infiltrating lymphocytes to decide whether it was pseudo-progression or real progression. BioMed Central 2016-07-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4950698/ /pubmed/27431235 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-016-2153-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Case Report
Bearz, Alessandra
Perin, Tiziana
Cancian, Luca
Berto, Eleonora
Sartor, Ivana
Tirelli, Umberto
Immune checkpoint inhibitors and response analysis: a tough challenge. A case report
title Immune checkpoint inhibitors and response analysis: a tough challenge. A case report
title_full Immune checkpoint inhibitors and response analysis: a tough challenge. A case report
title_fullStr Immune checkpoint inhibitors and response analysis: a tough challenge. A case report
title_full_unstemmed Immune checkpoint inhibitors and response analysis: a tough challenge. A case report
title_short Immune checkpoint inhibitors and response analysis: a tough challenge. A case report
title_sort immune checkpoint inhibitors and response analysis: a tough challenge. a case report
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4950698/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27431235
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-016-2153-9
work_keys_str_mv AT bearzalessandra immunecheckpointinhibitorsandresponseanalysisatoughchallengeacasereport
AT perintiziana immunecheckpointinhibitorsandresponseanalysisatoughchallengeacasereport
AT cancianluca immunecheckpointinhibitorsandresponseanalysisatoughchallengeacasereport
AT bertoeleonora immunecheckpointinhibitorsandresponseanalysisatoughchallengeacasereport
AT sartorivana immunecheckpointinhibitorsandresponseanalysisatoughchallengeacasereport
AT tirelliumberto immunecheckpointinhibitorsandresponseanalysisatoughchallengeacasereport