Cargando…

Vinflunine treatment in patients with metastatic urothelial cancer: A Nordic retrospective multicenter analysis

In 2009, vinflunine was introduced as a second-line treatment to be used after the failure of platinum therapy in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC). The present study investigated the administered vinflunine to patients with mUC in standard clinical practice with the aim of evaluat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Holmsten, Karin, Dohn, Line, Jensen, Niels Viggo, Shah, Carl-Henrik, Jäderling, Fredrik, Pappot, Helle, Ullén, Anders
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: D.A. Spandidos 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4950730/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27446429
http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/ol.2016.4775
_version_ 1782443598891974656
author Holmsten, Karin
Dohn, Line
Jensen, Niels Viggo
Shah, Carl-Henrik
Jäderling, Fredrik
Pappot, Helle
Ullén, Anders
author_facet Holmsten, Karin
Dohn, Line
Jensen, Niels Viggo
Shah, Carl-Henrik
Jäderling, Fredrik
Pappot, Helle
Ullén, Anders
author_sort Holmsten, Karin
collection PubMed
description In 2009, vinflunine was introduced as a second-line treatment to be used after the failure of platinum therapy in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC). The present study investigated the administered vinflunine to patients with mUC in standard clinical practice with the aim of evaluating treatment patterns, response, survival parameters and side-effects. Data were collected retrospectively from the first 100 mUC patients treated with vinflunine at three Nordic cancer centers associated with the Nordic Urothelial Cancer Oncology Group. The overall response rate was 23% and complete response was observed in one patient. The median progression-free survival (mPFS) and median overall survival (mOS) were 2.8 (range, 0.5–34.3) and 6.3 (range, 0.3–39.7) months, respectively. An Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) of 2 was present in 20% of the patients, and those patients exhibited significantly shorter mOS (4.1 vs. 7.0 months, P=0.001) and a significantly higher degree of grade 3/4 toxicity (P=0.026) compared with ECOG PS 0–1 patients. Furthermore, patients without visceral metastases had significantly longer mOS than patients with visceral metastases (10.6 vs. 6.0 months, P=0.008). The median number of cycles of vinflunine was 3 (range, 1–28). The current data confirms that vinflunine is an active agent for second-line treatment in an unselected clinical cohort of patients with mUC. ECOG PS and presence of visceral metastases were significant prognostic parameters. In particular, patients with ECOG PS 2 receiving vinflunine had a shorter mOS and a higher frequency of severe toxicity, and, thus, should be treated with caution. Furthermore, the present study observed large inter-individual differences in radiological response and OS, indicating the need for further development of improved patient selection tools to optimize vinflunine treatment in platinum-refractory mUC patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4950730
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher D.A. Spandidos
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49507302016-07-21 Vinflunine treatment in patients with metastatic urothelial cancer: A Nordic retrospective multicenter analysis Holmsten, Karin Dohn, Line Jensen, Niels Viggo Shah, Carl-Henrik Jäderling, Fredrik Pappot, Helle Ullén, Anders Oncol Lett Articles In 2009, vinflunine was introduced as a second-line treatment to be used after the failure of platinum therapy in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC). The present study investigated the administered vinflunine to patients with mUC in standard clinical practice with the aim of evaluating treatment patterns, response, survival parameters and side-effects. Data were collected retrospectively from the first 100 mUC patients treated with vinflunine at three Nordic cancer centers associated with the Nordic Urothelial Cancer Oncology Group. The overall response rate was 23% and complete response was observed in one patient. The median progression-free survival (mPFS) and median overall survival (mOS) were 2.8 (range, 0.5–34.3) and 6.3 (range, 0.3–39.7) months, respectively. An Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) of 2 was present in 20% of the patients, and those patients exhibited significantly shorter mOS (4.1 vs. 7.0 months, P=0.001) and a significantly higher degree of grade 3/4 toxicity (P=0.026) compared with ECOG PS 0–1 patients. Furthermore, patients without visceral metastases had significantly longer mOS than patients with visceral metastases (10.6 vs. 6.0 months, P=0.008). The median number of cycles of vinflunine was 3 (range, 1–28). The current data confirms that vinflunine is an active agent for second-line treatment in an unselected clinical cohort of patients with mUC. ECOG PS and presence of visceral metastases were significant prognostic parameters. In particular, patients with ECOG PS 2 receiving vinflunine had a shorter mOS and a higher frequency of severe toxicity, and, thus, should be treated with caution. Furthermore, the present study observed large inter-individual differences in radiological response and OS, indicating the need for further development of improved patient selection tools to optimize vinflunine treatment in platinum-refractory mUC patients. D.A. Spandidos 2016-08 2016-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4950730/ /pubmed/27446429 http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/ol.2016.4775 Text en Copyright: © Holmsten et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Articles
Holmsten, Karin
Dohn, Line
Jensen, Niels Viggo
Shah, Carl-Henrik
Jäderling, Fredrik
Pappot, Helle
Ullén, Anders
Vinflunine treatment in patients with metastatic urothelial cancer: A Nordic retrospective multicenter analysis
title Vinflunine treatment in patients with metastatic urothelial cancer: A Nordic retrospective multicenter analysis
title_full Vinflunine treatment in patients with metastatic urothelial cancer: A Nordic retrospective multicenter analysis
title_fullStr Vinflunine treatment in patients with metastatic urothelial cancer: A Nordic retrospective multicenter analysis
title_full_unstemmed Vinflunine treatment in patients with metastatic urothelial cancer: A Nordic retrospective multicenter analysis
title_short Vinflunine treatment in patients with metastatic urothelial cancer: A Nordic retrospective multicenter analysis
title_sort vinflunine treatment in patients with metastatic urothelial cancer: a nordic retrospective multicenter analysis
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4950730/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27446429
http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/ol.2016.4775
work_keys_str_mv AT holmstenkarin vinfluninetreatmentinpatientswithmetastaticurothelialcanceranordicretrospectivemulticenteranalysis
AT dohnline vinfluninetreatmentinpatientswithmetastaticurothelialcanceranordicretrospectivemulticenteranalysis
AT jensennielsviggo vinfluninetreatmentinpatientswithmetastaticurothelialcanceranordicretrospectivemulticenteranalysis
AT shahcarlhenrik vinfluninetreatmentinpatientswithmetastaticurothelialcanceranordicretrospectivemulticenteranalysis
AT jaderlingfredrik vinfluninetreatmentinpatientswithmetastaticurothelialcanceranordicretrospectivemulticenteranalysis
AT pappothelle vinfluninetreatmentinpatientswithmetastaticurothelialcanceranordicretrospectivemulticenteranalysis
AT ullenanders vinfluninetreatmentinpatientswithmetastaticurothelialcanceranordicretrospectivemulticenteranalysis