Cargando…

Comparing the clinical outcomes in stereotactic body radiotherapy for lung tumors between Ray-Tracing and Monte-Carlo algorithms

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes between the groups using Ray-Tracing (RAT) and Monte-Carlo (MC) calculation algorithms for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) of lung tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-five patients received SBRT with CyberKnife for 47 pr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Song, Jin Ho, Kang, Ki Mun, Choi, Hoon-Sik, Jeong, Hojin, Ha, In Bong, Lee, Jong Deog, Kim, Ho Cheol, Jeong, Yi Yeong, Cho, Yu Ji, Lee, Seung Jun, Kim, Sung Hwan, Jang, In-Seok, Jeong, Bae Kwon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Impact Journals LLC 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4951350/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26544622
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.5992
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes between the groups using Ray-Tracing (RAT) and Monte-Carlo (MC) calculation algorithms for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) of lung tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-five patients received SBRT with CyberKnife for 47 primary or metastatic lung tumors. RAT was used for 22 targets in 12 patients, and MC for 25 targets in 23 patients. Total dose of 48 to 60 Gy was prescribed in 3 to 5 fractions on median 80% isodose line. The response rate, local control rate, and toxicities were compared between RAT and MC groups. RESULTS: The response rate was lower in the RAT group (77.3%) compared to the MC group (100%) (p = 0.008). The response rates showed an association with the mean dose to the gross tumor volume, which the doses were re-calculated with MC algorithm in both groups. However, the local control rate and toxicities did not differ between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical outcome and toxicity of lung SBRT between the RAT and MC groups were similar except for the response rate when the same apparent doses were prescribed. The lower response rate in the RAT group, however, did not compromise the local control rates. As such, reducing the prescription dose for MC algorithm may be performed but done with caution.