Cargando…

Re-Irradiation for Recurrent Gliomas: Treatment Outcomes and Prognostic Factors

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of re-irradiation in patients with recurrent gliomas and to identify subgroups for whom re-irradiation for recurrent gliomas is most beneficial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 36 patients with recurrent or progressive gl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Jeongshim, Cho, Jaeho, Chang, Jong Hee, Suh, Chang-Ok
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Yonsei University College of Medicine 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4951456/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27189273
http://dx.doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2016.57.4.824
_version_ 1782443706051198976
author Lee, Jeongshim
Cho, Jaeho
Chang, Jong Hee
Suh, Chang-Ok
author_facet Lee, Jeongshim
Cho, Jaeho
Chang, Jong Hee
Suh, Chang-Ok
author_sort Lee, Jeongshim
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of re-irradiation in patients with recurrent gliomas and to identify subgroups for whom re-irradiation for recurrent gliomas is most beneficial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 36 patients with recurrent or progressive gliomas who received re-irradiation between January 1996 and December 2011. Re-irradiation was offered to recurrent glioma patients with good performance or at least 6 months had passed after initial radiotherapy (RT), with few exceptions. RESULTS: Median doses of re-irradiation and initial RT were 45.0 Gy and 59.4 Gy, respectively. The median time interval between initial RT and re-irradiation was 30.5 months. Median overall survival (OS) and the 12-month OS rate were 11 months and 41.7%, respectively. In univariate analysis, Karnofsky performance status (KPS) ≥70 (p<0.001), re-irradiation dose ≥45 Gy (p=0.040), and longer time interval between initial RT and re-irradiation (p=0.040) were associated with improved OS. In multivariate analysis, KPS (p=0.030) and length of time interval between initial RT and re-irradiation (p=0.048) were important predictors of OS. A radiographically suspected mixture of radiation necrosis and progression after re-irradiation was seen in 5 patients. CONCLUSION: Re-irradiation in conjunction with surgery could be a salvage treatment for selected recurrent glioma patients with good performance status and recurrence over a long time.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4951456
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Yonsei University College of Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49514562016-07-20 Re-Irradiation for Recurrent Gliomas: Treatment Outcomes and Prognostic Factors Lee, Jeongshim Cho, Jaeho Chang, Jong Hee Suh, Chang-Ok Yonsei Med J Original Article PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of re-irradiation in patients with recurrent gliomas and to identify subgroups for whom re-irradiation for recurrent gliomas is most beneficial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 36 patients with recurrent or progressive gliomas who received re-irradiation between January 1996 and December 2011. Re-irradiation was offered to recurrent glioma patients with good performance or at least 6 months had passed after initial radiotherapy (RT), with few exceptions. RESULTS: Median doses of re-irradiation and initial RT were 45.0 Gy and 59.4 Gy, respectively. The median time interval between initial RT and re-irradiation was 30.5 months. Median overall survival (OS) and the 12-month OS rate were 11 months and 41.7%, respectively. In univariate analysis, Karnofsky performance status (KPS) ≥70 (p<0.001), re-irradiation dose ≥45 Gy (p=0.040), and longer time interval between initial RT and re-irradiation (p=0.040) were associated with improved OS. In multivariate analysis, KPS (p=0.030) and length of time interval between initial RT and re-irradiation (p=0.048) were important predictors of OS. A radiographically suspected mixture of radiation necrosis and progression after re-irradiation was seen in 5 patients. CONCLUSION: Re-irradiation in conjunction with surgery could be a salvage treatment for selected recurrent glioma patients with good performance status and recurrence over a long time. Yonsei University College of Medicine 2016-07-01 2016-05-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4951456/ /pubmed/27189273 http://dx.doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2016.57.4.824 Text en © Copyright: Yonsei University College of Medicine 2016 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Lee, Jeongshim
Cho, Jaeho
Chang, Jong Hee
Suh, Chang-Ok
Re-Irradiation for Recurrent Gliomas: Treatment Outcomes and Prognostic Factors
title Re-Irradiation for Recurrent Gliomas: Treatment Outcomes and Prognostic Factors
title_full Re-Irradiation for Recurrent Gliomas: Treatment Outcomes and Prognostic Factors
title_fullStr Re-Irradiation for Recurrent Gliomas: Treatment Outcomes and Prognostic Factors
title_full_unstemmed Re-Irradiation for Recurrent Gliomas: Treatment Outcomes and Prognostic Factors
title_short Re-Irradiation for Recurrent Gliomas: Treatment Outcomes and Prognostic Factors
title_sort re-irradiation for recurrent gliomas: treatment outcomes and prognostic factors
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4951456/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27189273
http://dx.doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2016.57.4.824
work_keys_str_mv AT leejeongshim reirradiationforrecurrentgliomastreatmentoutcomesandprognosticfactors
AT chojaeho reirradiationforrecurrentgliomastreatmentoutcomesandprognosticfactors
AT changjonghee reirradiationforrecurrentgliomastreatmentoutcomesandprognosticfactors
AT suhchangok reirradiationforrecurrentgliomastreatmentoutcomesandprognosticfactors