Cargando…

Current knowledge on radon risk: implications for practical radiation protection? radon workshop, 1/2 December 2015, Bonn, BMUB (Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz, Bau und Reaktorsicherheit; Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation, Building and Nuclear Safety)

ICRP suggested a strategy based on the distinction between a protection approach for dwellings and one for workplaces in the previous recommendations on radon. Now, the Commission recommends an integrated approach for the protection against radon exposure in all buildings irrespective of their purpo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Müller, Wolfgang-Ulrich, Giussani, Augusto, Rühm, Werner, Lecomte, Jean-Francois, Harrison, John, Kreuzer, Michaela, Sobotzki, Christina, Breckow, Joachim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4951500/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27334644
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00411-016-0657-2
_version_ 1782443715887890432
author Müller, Wolfgang-Ulrich
Giussani, Augusto
Rühm, Werner
Lecomte, Jean-Francois
Harrison, John
Kreuzer, Michaela
Sobotzki, Christina
Breckow, Joachim
author_facet Müller, Wolfgang-Ulrich
Giussani, Augusto
Rühm, Werner
Lecomte, Jean-Francois
Harrison, John
Kreuzer, Michaela
Sobotzki, Christina
Breckow, Joachim
author_sort Müller, Wolfgang-Ulrich
collection PubMed
description ICRP suggested a strategy based on the distinction between a protection approach for dwellings and one for workplaces in the previous recommendations on radon. Now, the Commission recommends an integrated approach for the protection against radon exposure in all buildings irrespective of their purpose and the status of their occupants. The strategy of protection in buildings, implemented through a national action plan, is based on the application of the optimisation principle below a derived reference level in concentration (maximum 300 Bq m(−3)). A problem, however, arises that due to new epidemiological findings and application of dosimetric models, ICRP 115 (Ann ICRP 40, 2010) presents nominal probability coefficients for radon exposure that are approximately by a factor of 2 larger than in the former recommendations of ICRP 65 (Ann ICRP 23, 1993). On the basis of the so-called epidemiological approach and the dosimetric approach, the doubling of risk per unit exposure is represented by a doubling of the dose coefficients, while the risk coefficient of ICRP 103 (2007) remains unchanged. Thus, an identical given radon exposure situation with the new dose coefficients would result in a doubling of dose compared with the former values. This is of serious conceptual implications. A possible solution of this problem was presented during the workshop.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4951500
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49515002016-07-29 Current knowledge on radon risk: implications for practical radiation protection? radon workshop, 1/2 December 2015, Bonn, BMUB (Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz, Bau und Reaktorsicherheit; Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation, Building and Nuclear Safety) Müller, Wolfgang-Ulrich Giussani, Augusto Rühm, Werner Lecomte, Jean-Francois Harrison, John Kreuzer, Michaela Sobotzki, Christina Breckow, Joachim Radiat Environ Biophys Controversial Issue ICRP suggested a strategy based on the distinction between a protection approach for dwellings and one for workplaces in the previous recommendations on radon. Now, the Commission recommends an integrated approach for the protection against radon exposure in all buildings irrespective of their purpose and the status of their occupants. The strategy of protection in buildings, implemented through a national action plan, is based on the application of the optimisation principle below a derived reference level in concentration (maximum 300 Bq m(−3)). A problem, however, arises that due to new epidemiological findings and application of dosimetric models, ICRP 115 (Ann ICRP 40, 2010) presents nominal probability coefficients for radon exposure that are approximately by a factor of 2 larger than in the former recommendations of ICRP 65 (Ann ICRP 23, 1993). On the basis of the so-called epidemiological approach and the dosimetric approach, the doubling of risk per unit exposure is represented by a doubling of the dose coefficients, while the risk coefficient of ICRP 103 (2007) remains unchanged. Thus, an identical given radon exposure situation with the new dose coefficients would result in a doubling of dose compared with the former values. This is of serious conceptual implications. A possible solution of this problem was presented during the workshop. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016-06-22 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4951500/ /pubmed/27334644 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00411-016-0657-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Controversial Issue
Müller, Wolfgang-Ulrich
Giussani, Augusto
Rühm, Werner
Lecomte, Jean-Francois
Harrison, John
Kreuzer, Michaela
Sobotzki, Christina
Breckow, Joachim
Current knowledge on radon risk: implications for practical radiation protection? radon workshop, 1/2 December 2015, Bonn, BMUB (Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz, Bau und Reaktorsicherheit; Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation, Building and Nuclear Safety)
title Current knowledge on radon risk: implications for practical radiation protection? radon workshop, 1/2 December 2015, Bonn, BMUB (Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz, Bau und Reaktorsicherheit; Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation, Building and Nuclear Safety)
title_full Current knowledge on radon risk: implications for practical radiation protection? radon workshop, 1/2 December 2015, Bonn, BMUB (Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz, Bau und Reaktorsicherheit; Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation, Building and Nuclear Safety)
title_fullStr Current knowledge on radon risk: implications for practical radiation protection? radon workshop, 1/2 December 2015, Bonn, BMUB (Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz, Bau und Reaktorsicherheit; Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation, Building and Nuclear Safety)
title_full_unstemmed Current knowledge on radon risk: implications for practical radiation protection? radon workshop, 1/2 December 2015, Bonn, BMUB (Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz, Bau und Reaktorsicherheit; Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation, Building and Nuclear Safety)
title_short Current knowledge on radon risk: implications for practical radiation protection? radon workshop, 1/2 December 2015, Bonn, BMUB (Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz, Bau und Reaktorsicherheit; Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation, Building and Nuclear Safety)
title_sort current knowledge on radon risk: implications for practical radiation protection? radon workshop, 1/2 december 2015, bonn, bmub (bundesministerium für umwelt, naturschutz, bau und reaktorsicherheit; federal ministry for the environment, nature conservation, building and nuclear safety)
topic Controversial Issue
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4951500/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27334644
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00411-016-0657-2
work_keys_str_mv AT mullerwolfgangulrich currentknowledgeonradonriskimplicationsforpracticalradiationprotectionradonworkshop12december2015bonnbmubbundesministeriumfurumweltnaturschutzbauundreaktorsicherheitfederalministryfortheenvironmentnatureconservationbuildingandnuclearsafety
AT giussaniaugusto currentknowledgeonradonriskimplicationsforpracticalradiationprotectionradonworkshop12december2015bonnbmubbundesministeriumfurumweltnaturschutzbauundreaktorsicherheitfederalministryfortheenvironmentnatureconservationbuildingandnuclearsafety
AT ruhmwerner currentknowledgeonradonriskimplicationsforpracticalradiationprotectionradonworkshop12december2015bonnbmubbundesministeriumfurumweltnaturschutzbauundreaktorsicherheitfederalministryfortheenvironmentnatureconservationbuildingandnuclearsafety
AT lecomtejeanfrancois currentknowledgeonradonriskimplicationsforpracticalradiationprotectionradonworkshop12december2015bonnbmubbundesministeriumfurumweltnaturschutzbauundreaktorsicherheitfederalministryfortheenvironmentnatureconservationbuildingandnuclearsafety
AT harrisonjohn currentknowledgeonradonriskimplicationsforpracticalradiationprotectionradonworkshop12december2015bonnbmubbundesministeriumfurumweltnaturschutzbauundreaktorsicherheitfederalministryfortheenvironmentnatureconservationbuildingandnuclearsafety
AT kreuzermichaela currentknowledgeonradonriskimplicationsforpracticalradiationprotectionradonworkshop12december2015bonnbmubbundesministeriumfurumweltnaturschutzbauundreaktorsicherheitfederalministryfortheenvironmentnatureconservationbuildingandnuclearsafety
AT sobotzkichristina currentknowledgeonradonriskimplicationsforpracticalradiationprotectionradonworkshop12december2015bonnbmubbundesministeriumfurumweltnaturschutzbauundreaktorsicherheitfederalministryfortheenvironmentnatureconservationbuildingandnuclearsafety
AT breckowjoachim currentknowledgeonradonriskimplicationsforpracticalradiationprotectionradonworkshop12december2015bonnbmubbundesministeriumfurumweltnaturschutzbauundreaktorsicherheitfederalministryfortheenvironmentnatureconservationbuildingandnuclearsafety