Cargando…

Mapping small-effect and linked quantitative trait loci for complex traits in backcross or DH populations via a multi-locus GWAS methodology

Composite interval mapping (CIM) is the most widely-used method in linkage analysis. Its main feature is the ability to control genomic background effects via inclusion of co-factors in its genetic model. However, the result often depends on how the co-factors are selected, especially for small-effe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Shi-Bo, Wen, Yang-Jun, Ren, Wen-Long, Ni, Yuan-Li, Zhang, Jin, Feng, Jian-Ying, Zhang, Yuan-Ming
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4951730/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27435756
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep29951
_version_ 1782443756158451712
author Wang, Shi-Bo
Wen, Yang-Jun
Ren, Wen-Long
Ni, Yuan-Li
Zhang, Jin
Feng, Jian-Ying
Zhang, Yuan-Ming
author_facet Wang, Shi-Bo
Wen, Yang-Jun
Ren, Wen-Long
Ni, Yuan-Li
Zhang, Jin
Feng, Jian-Ying
Zhang, Yuan-Ming
author_sort Wang, Shi-Bo
collection PubMed
description Composite interval mapping (CIM) is the most widely-used method in linkage analysis. Its main feature is the ability to control genomic background effects via inclusion of co-factors in its genetic model. However, the result often depends on how the co-factors are selected, especially for small-effect and linked quantitative trait loci (QTL). To address this issue, here we proposed a new method under the framework of genome-wide association studies (GWAS). First, a single-locus random-SNP-effect mixed linear model method for GWAS was used to scan each putative QTL on the genome in backcross or doubled haploid populations. Here, controlling background via selecting markers in the CIM was replaced by estimating polygenic variance. Then, all the peaks in the negative logarithm P-value curve were selected as the positions of multiple putative QTL to be included in a multi-locus genetic model, and true QTL were automatically identified by empirical Bayes. This called genome-wide CIM (GCIM). A series of simulated and real datasets was used to validate the new method. As a result, the new method had higher power in QTL detection, greater accuracy in QTL effect estimation, and stronger robustness under various backgrounds as compared with the CIM and empirical Bayes methods.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4951730
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49517302016-07-26 Mapping small-effect and linked quantitative trait loci for complex traits in backcross or DH populations via a multi-locus GWAS methodology Wang, Shi-Bo Wen, Yang-Jun Ren, Wen-Long Ni, Yuan-Li Zhang, Jin Feng, Jian-Ying Zhang, Yuan-Ming Sci Rep Article Composite interval mapping (CIM) is the most widely-used method in linkage analysis. Its main feature is the ability to control genomic background effects via inclusion of co-factors in its genetic model. However, the result often depends on how the co-factors are selected, especially for small-effect and linked quantitative trait loci (QTL). To address this issue, here we proposed a new method under the framework of genome-wide association studies (GWAS). First, a single-locus random-SNP-effect mixed linear model method for GWAS was used to scan each putative QTL on the genome in backcross or doubled haploid populations. Here, controlling background via selecting markers in the CIM was replaced by estimating polygenic variance. Then, all the peaks in the negative logarithm P-value curve were selected as the positions of multiple putative QTL to be included in a multi-locus genetic model, and true QTL were automatically identified by empirical Bayes. This called genome-wide CIM (GCIM). A series of simulated and real datasets was used to validate the new method. As a result, the new method had higher power in QTL detection, greater accuracy in QTL effect estimation, and stronger robustness under various backgrounds as compared with the CIM and empirical Bayes methods. Nature Publishing Group 2016-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4951730/ /pubmed/27435756 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep29951 Text en Copyright © 2016, Macmillan Publishers Limited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Wang, Shi-Bo
Wen, Yang-Jun
Ren, Wen-Long
Ni, Yuan-Li
Zhang, Jin
Feng, Jian-Ying
Zhang, Yuan-Ming
Mapping small-effect and linked quantitative trait loci for complex traits in backcross or DH populations via a multi-locus GWAS methodology
title Mapping small-effect and linked quantitative trait loci for complex traits in backcross or DH populations via a multi-locus GWAS methodology
title_full Mapping small-effect and linked quantitative trait loci for complex traits in backcross or DH populations via a multi-locus GWAS methodology
title_fullStr Mapping small-effect and linked quantitative trait loci for complex traits in backcross or DH populations via a multi-locus GWAS methodology
title_full_unstemmed Mapping small-effect and linked quantitative trait loci for complex traits in backcross or DH populations via a multi-locus GWAS methodology
title_short Mapping small-effect and linked quantitative trait loci for complex traits in backcross or DH populations via a multi-locus GWAS methodology
title_sort mapping small-effect and linked quantitative trait loci for complex traits in backcross or dh populations via a multi-locus gwas methodology
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4951730/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27435756
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep29951
work_keys_str_mv AT wangshibo mappingsmalleffectandlinkedquantitativetraitlociforcomplextraitsinbackcrossordhpopulationsviaamultilocusgwasmethodology
AT wenyangjun mappingsmalleffectandlinkedquantitativetraitlociforcomplextraitsinbackcrossordhpopulationsviaamultilocusgwasmethodology
AT renwenlong mappingsmalleffectandlinkedquantitativetraitlociforcomplextraitsinbackcrossordhpopulationsviaamultilocusgwasmethodology
AT niyuanli mappingsmalleffectandlinkedquantitativetraitlociforcomplextraitsinbackcrossordhpopulationsviaamultilocusgwasmethodology
AT zhangjin mappingsmalleffectandlinkedquantitativetraitlociforcomplextraitsinbackcrossordhpopulationsviaamultilocusgwasmethodology
AT fengjianying mappingsmalleffectandlinkedquantitativetraitlociforcomplextraitsinbackcrossordhpopulationsviaamultilocusgwasmethodology
AT zhangyuanming mappingsmalleffectandlinkedquantitativetraitlociforcomplextraitsinbackcrossordhpopulationsviaamultilocusgwasmethodology