Cargando…
Mapping small-effect and linked quantitative trait loci for complex traits in backcross or DH populations via a multi-locus GWAS methodology
Composite interval mapping (CIM) is the most widely-used method in linkage analysis. Its main feature is the ability to control genomic background effects via inclusion of co-factors in its genetic model. However, the result often depends on how the co-factors are selected, especially for small-effe...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4951730/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27435756 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep29951 |
_version_ | 1782443756158451712 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Shi-Bo Wen, Yang-Jun Ren, Wen-Long Ni, Yuan-Li Zhang, Jin Feng, Jian-Ying Zhang, Yuan-Ming |
author_facet | Wang, Shi-Bo Wen, Yang-Jun Ren, Wen-Long Ni, Yuan-Li Zhang, Jin Feng, Jian-Ying Zhang, Yuan-Ming |
author_sort | Wang, Shi-Bo |
collection | PubMed |
description | Composite interval mapping (CIM) is the most widely-used method in linkage analysis. Its main feature is the ability to control genomic background effects via inclusion of co-factors in its genetic model. However, the result often depends on how the co-factors are selected, especially for small-effect and linked quantitative trait loci (QTL). To address this issue, here we proposed a new method under the framework of genome-wide association studies (GWAS). First, a single-locus random-SNP-effect mixed linear model method for GWAS was used to scan each putative QTL on the genome in backcross or doubled haploid populations. Here, controlling background via selecting markers in the CIM was replaced by estimating polygenic variance. Then, all the peaks in the negative logarithm P-value curve were selected as the positions of multiple putative QTL to be included in a multi-locus genetic model, and true QTL were automatically identified by empirical Bayes. This called genome-wide CIM (GCIM). A series of simulated and real datasets was used to validate the new method. As a result, the new method had higher power in QTL detection, greater accuracy in QTL effect estimation, and stronger robustness under various backgrounds as compared with the CIM and empirical Bayes methods. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4951730 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49517302016-07-26 Mapping small-effect and linked quantitative trait loci for complex traits in backcross or DH populations via a multi-locus GWAS methodology Wang, Shi-Bo Wen, Yang-Jun Ren, Wen-Long Ni, Yuan-Li Zhang, Jin Feng, Jian-Ying Zhang, Yuan-Ming Sci Rep Article Composite interval mapping (CIM) is the most widely-used method in linkage analysis. Its main feature is the ability to control genomic background effects via inclusion of co-factors in its genetic model. However, the result often depends on how the co-factors are selected, especially for small-effect and linked quantitative trait loci (QTL). To address this issue, here we proposed a new method under the framework of genome-wide association studies (GWAS). First, a single-locus random-SNP-effect mixed linear model method for GWAS was used to scan each putative QTL on the genome in backcross or doubled haploid populations. Here, controlling background via selecting markers in the CIM was replaced by estimating polygenic variance. Then, all the peaks in the negative logarithm P-value curve were selected as the positions of multiple putative QTL to be included in a multi-locus genetic model, and true QTL were automatically identified by empirical Bayes. This called genome-wide CIM (GCIM). A series of simulated and real datasets was used to validate the new method. As a result, the new method had higher power in QTL detection, greater accuracy in QTL effect estimation, and stronger robustness under various backgrounds as compared with the CIM and empirical Bayes methods. Nature Publishing Group 2016-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4951730/ /pubmed/27435756 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep29951 Text en Copyright © 2016, Macmillan Publishers Limited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Article Wang, Shi-Bo Wen, Yang-Jun Ren, Wen-Long Ni, Yuan-Li Zhang, Jin Feng, Jian-Ying Zhang, Yuan-Ming Mapping small-effect and linked quantitative trait loci for complex traits in backcross or DH populations via a multi-locus GWAS methodology |
title | Mapping small-effect and linked quantitative trait loci for complex traits in backcross or DH populations via a multi-locus GWAS methodology |
title_full | Mapping small-effect and linked quantitative trait loci for complex traits in backcross or DH populations via a multi-locus GWAS methodology |
title_fullStr | Mapping small-effect and linked quantitative trait loci for complex traits in backcross or DH populations via a multi-locus GWAS methodology |
title_full_unstemmed | Mapping small-effect and linked quantitative trait loci for complex traits in backcross or DH populations via a multi-locus GWAS methodology |
title_short | Mapping small-effect and linked quantitative trait loci for complex traits in backcross or DH populations via a multi-locus GWAS methodology |
title_sort | mapping small-effect and linked quantitative trait loci for complex traits in backcross or dh populations via a multi-locus gwas methodology |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4951730/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27435756 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep29951 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangshibo mappingsmalleffectandlinkedquantitativetraitlociforcomplextraitsinbackcrossordhpopulationsviaamultilocusgwasmethodology AT wenyangjun mappingsmalleffectandlinkedquantitativetraitlociforcomplextraitsinbackcrossordhpopulationsviaamultilocusgwasmethodology AT renwenlong mappingsmalleffectandlinkedquantitativetraitlociforcomplextraitsinbackcrossordhpopulationsviaamultilocusgwasmethodology AT niyuanli mappingsmalleffectandlinkedquantitativetraitlociforcomplextraitsinbackcrossordhpopulationsviaamultilocusgwasmethodology AT zhangjin mappingsmalleffectandlinkedquantitativetraitlociforcomplextraitsinbackcrossordhpopulationsviaamultilocusgwasmethodology AT fengjianying mappingsmalleffectandlinkedquantitativetraitlociforcomplextraitsinbackcrossordhpopulationsviaamultilocusgwasmethodology AT zhangyuanming mappingsmalleffectandlinkedquantitativetraitlociforcomplextraitsinbackcrossordhpopulationsviaamultilocusgwasmethodology |