Cargando…
An imperfect “PAST” Lessons learned from the National Review of Asthma Deaths (NRAD) UK
Asthma deaths are a barometer of the quality of asthma care. The principal care for patients with severe asthma is often a joint partnership between primary and secondary services. Communication between the two services determines the effectiveness of treatment. Undertaking an audit on asthma in eit...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4952053/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27435407 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12931-016-0393-9 |
_version_ | 1782443773534404608 |
---|---|
author | Nasser, Shuaib |
author_facet | Nasser, Shuaib |
author_sort | Nasser, Shuaib |
collection | PubMed |
description | Asthma deaths are a barometer of the quality of asthma care. The principal care for patients with severe asthma is often a joint partnership between primary and secondary services. Communication between the two services determines the effectiveness of treatment. Undertaking an audit on asthma in either primary or separately in secondary care is a relatively straightforward process. However, when the audit spans both primary and secondary care in a country as large as the United Kingdom which is further sub-divided into the separate healthcare systems of England, Wales, Scotland, and Northern Island, then the audit becomes considerably more challenging. The National Review of Asthma Deaths (NRAD) reported in May 2014 was a confidential enquiry tasked with identifying circumstances surrounding asthma deaths across the whole of the UK, in order to ascertain avoidable factors and make recommendations to improve care and reduce future asthma deaths (Why asthma still kills: the National Review of Asthma Deaths (NRAD) Confidential Enquiry report, 2014, http://www.rcplondon.ac.uk/sites/default/files/why-asthma-still-kills-full-report.pdf). The idea for NRAD arose from a longstanding East of England confidential enquiry started in 1988 by Dr Brian Harrison and then handed onto me in 2001 until funding for the national review of asthma deaths was secured in 2010. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4952053 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49520532016-07-21 An imperfect “PAST” Lessons learned from the National Review of Asthma Deaths (NRAD) UK Nasser, Shuaib Respir Res Editorial Asthma deaths are a barometer of the quality of asthma care. The principal care for patients with severe asthma is often a joint partnership between primary and secondary services. Communication between the two services determines the effectiveness of treatment. Undertaking an audit on asthma in either primary or separately in secondary care is a relatively straightforward process. However, when the audit spans both primary and secondary care in a country as large as the United Kingdom which is further sub-divided into the separate healthcare systems of England, Wales, Scotland, and Northern Island, then the audit becomes considerably more challenging. The National Review of Asthma Deaths (NRAD) reported in May 2014 was a confidential enquiry tasked with identifying circumstances surrounding asthma deaths across the whole of the UK, in order to ascertain avoidable factors and make recommendations to improve care and reduce future asthma deaths (Why asthma still kills: the National Review of Asthma Deaths (NRAD) Confidential Enquiry report, 2014, http://www.rcplondon.ac.uk/sites/default/files/why-asthma-still-kills-full-report.pdf). The idea for NRAD arose from a longstanding East of England confidential enquiry started in 1988 by Dr Brian Harrison and then handed onto me in 2001 until funding for the national review of asthma deaths was secured in 2010. BioMed Central 2016-07-19 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4952053/ /pubmed/27435407 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12931-016-0393-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Editorial Nasser, Shuaib An imperfect “PAST” Lessons learned from the National Review of Asthma Deaths (NRAD) UK |
title | An imperfect “PAST” Lessons learned from the National Review of Asthma Deaths (NRAD) UK |
title_full | An imperfect “PAST” Lessons learned from the National Review of Asthma Deaths (NRAD) UK |
title_fullStr | An imperfect “PAST” Lessons learned from the National Review of Asthma Deaths (NRAD) UK |
title_full_unstemmed | An imperfect “PAST” Lessons learned from the National Review of Asthma Deaths (NRAD) UK |
title_short | An imperfect “PAST” Lessons learned from the National Review of Asthma Deaths (NRAD) UK |
title_sort | imperfect “past” lessons learned from the national review of asthma deaths (nrad) uk |
topic | Editorial |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4952053/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27435407 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12931-016-0393-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nassershuaib animperfectpastlessonslearnedfromthenationalreviewofasthmadeathsnraduk AT nassershuaib imperfectpastlessonslearnedfromthenationalreviewofasthmadeathsnraduk |