Cargando…

The Gap Between Clinical Research and Standard of Care: A Review of Frailty Assessment Scales in Perioperative Surgical Settings

The elderly population in the United States is increasing exponentially in tandem with risk for frailty. Frailty is described by a clinically significant state where a patient is at risk for developing complications requiring increased assistance in daily activities. Frailty syndrome studied in geri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stoicea, Nicoleta, Baddigam, Ramya, Wajahn, Jennifer, Sipes, Angela C., Arias-Morales, Carlos E., Gastaldo, Nicholas, Bergese, Sergio D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4954808/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27493935
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2016.00150
_version_ 1782443833517146112
author Stoicea, Nicoleta
Baddigam, Ramya
Wajahn, Jennifer
Sipes, Angela C.
Arias-Morales, Carlos E.
Gastaldo, Nicholas
Bergese, Sergio D.
author_facet Stoicea, Nicoleta
Baddigam, Ramya
Wajahn, Jennifer
Sipes, Angela C.
Arias-Morales, Carlos E.
Gastaldo, Nicholas
Bergese, Sergio D.
author_sort Stoicea, Nicoleta
collection PubMed
description The elderly population in the United States is increasing exponentially in tandem with risk for frailty. Frailty is described by a clinically significant state where a patient is at risk for developing complications requiring increased assistance in daily activities. Frailty syndrome studied in geriatric patients is responsible for an increased risk for falls, and increased mortality. In efforts to prepare for and to intervene in perioperative complications and general frailty, a universal scale to measure frailty is necessary. Many methods for determining frailty have been developed, yet there remains a need to define clinical frailty and, therefore, the most effective way to measure it. This article reviews six popular scales for measuring frailty and evaluates their clinical effectiveness demonstrated in previous studies. By identifying the most time-efficient, criteria comprehensive, and clinically effective scale, a universal scale can be implemented into standard of care and reduce complications from frailty in both non-surgical and surgical settings, especially applied to the perioperative surgical home model. We suggest further evaluation of the Edmonton Frailty Scale for inclusion in patient care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4954808
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49548082016-08-04 The Gap Between Clinical Research and Standard of Care: A Review of Frailty Assessment Scales in Perioperative Surgical Settings Stoicea, Nicoleta Baddigam, Ramya Wajahn, Jennifer Sipes, Angela C. Arias-Morales, Carlos E. Gastaldo, Nicholas Bergese, Sergio D. Front Public Health Public Health The elderly population in the United States is increasing exponentially in tandem with risk for frailty. Frailty is described by a clinically significant state where a patient is at risk for developing complications requiring increased assistance in daily activities. Frailty syndrome studied in geriatric patients is responsible for an increased risk for falls, and increased mortality. In efforts to prepare for and to intervene in perioperative complications and general frailty, a universal scale to measure frailty is necessary. Many methods for determining frailty have been developed, yet there remains a need to define clinical frailty and, therefore, the most effective way to measure it. This article reviews six popular scales for measuring frailty and evaluates their clinical effectiveness demonstrated in previous studies. By identifying the most time-efficient, criteria comprehensive, and clinically effective scale, a universal scale can be implemented into standard of care and reduce complications from frailty in both non-surgical and surgical settings, especially applied to the perioperative surgical home model. We suggest further evaluation of the Edmonton Frailty Scale for inclusion in patient care. Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4954808/ /pubmed/27493935 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2016.00150 Text en Copyright © 2016 Stoicea, Baddigam, Wajahn, Sipes, Arias-Morales, Gastaldo and Bergese. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Public Health
Stoicea, Nicoleta
Baddigam, Ramya
Wajahn, Jennifer
Sipes, Angela C.
Arias-Morales, Carlos E.
Gastaldo, Nicholas
Bergese, Sergio D.
The Gap Between Clinical Research and Standard of Care: A Review of Frailty Assessment Scales in Perioperative Surgical Settings
title The Gap Between Clinical Research and Standard of Care: A Review of Frailty Assessment Scales in Perioperative Surgical Settings
title_full The Gap Between Clinical Research and Standard of Care: A Review of Frailty Assessment Scales in Perioperative Surgical Settings
title_fullStr The Gap Between Clinical Research and Standard of Care: A Review of Frailty Assessment Scales in Perioperative Surgical Settings
title_full_unstemmed The Gap Between Clinical Research and Standard of Care: A Review of Frailty Assessment Scales in Perioperative Surgical Settings
title_short The Gap Between Clinical Research and Standard of Care: A Review of Frailty Assessment Scales in Perioperative Surgical Settings
title_sort gap between clinical research and standard of care: a review of frailty assessment scales in perioperative surgical settings
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4954808/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27493935
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2016.00150
work_keys_str_mv AT stoiceanicoleta thegapbetweenclinicalresearchandstandardofcareareviewoffrailtyassessmentscalesinperioperativesurgicalsettings
AT baddigamramya thegapbetweenclinicalresearchandstandardofcareareviewoffrailtyassessmentscalesinperioperativesurgicalsettings
AT wajahnjennifer thegapbetweenclinicalresearchandstandardofcareareviewoffrailtyassessmentscalesinperioperativesurgicalsettings
AT sipesangelac thegapbetweenclinicalresearchandstandardofcareareviewoffrailtyassessmentscalesinperioperativesurgicalsettings
AT ariasmoralescarlose thegapbetweenclinicalresearchandstandardofcareareviewoffrailtyassessmentscalesinperioperativesurgicalsettings
AT gastaldonicholas thegapbetweenclinicalresearchandstandardofcareareviewoffrailtyassessmentscalesinperioperativesurgicalsettings
AT bergesesergiod thegapbetweenclinicalresearchandstandardofcareareviewoffrailtyassessmentscalesinperioperativesurgicalsettings
AT stoiceanicoleta gapbetweenclinicalresearchandstandardofcareareviewoffrailtyassessmentscalesinperioperativesurgicalsettings
AT baddigamramya gapbetweenclinicalresearchandstandardofcareareviewoffrailtyassessmentscalesinperioperativesurgicalsettings
AT wajahnjennifer gapbetweenclinicalresearchandstandardofcareareviewoffrailtyassessmentscalesinperioperativesurgicalsettings
AT sipesangelac gapbetweenclinicalresearchandstandardofcareareviewoffrailtyassessmentscalesinperioperativesurgicalsettings
AT ariasmoralescarlose gapbetweenclinicalresearchandstandardofcareareviewoffrailtyassessmentscalesinperioperativesurgicalsettings
AT gastaldonicholas gapbetweenclinicalresearchandstandardofcareareviewoffrailtyassessmentscalesinperioperativesurgicalsettings
AT bergesesergiod gapbetweenclinicalresearchandstandardofcareareviewoffrailtyassessmentscalesinperioperativesurgicalsettings