Cargando…
The Gap Between Clinical Research and Standard of Care: A Review of Frailty Assessment Scales in Perioperative Surgical Settings
The elderly population in the United States is increasing exponentially in tandem with risk for frailty. Frailty is described by a clinically significant state where a patient is at risk for developing complications requiring increased assistance in daily activities. Frailty syndrome studied in geri...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4954808/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27493935 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2016.00150 |
_version_ | 1782443833517146112 |
---|---|
author | Stoicea, Nicoleta Baddigam, Ramya Wajahn, Jennifer Sipes, Angela C. Arias-Morales, Carlos E. Gastaldo, Nicholas Bergese, Sergio D. |
author_facet | Stoicea, Nicoleta Baddigam, Ramya Wajahn, Jennifer Sipes, Angela C. Arias-Morales, Carlos E. Gastaldo, Nicholas Bergese, Sergio D. |
author_sort | Stoicea, Nicoleta |
collection | PubMed |
description | The elderly population in the United States is increasing exponentially in tandem with risk for frailty. Frailty is described by a clinically significant state where a patient is at risk for developing complications requiring increased assistance in daily activities. Frailty syndrome studied in geriatric patients is responsible for an increased risk for falls, and increased mortality. In efforts to prepare for and to intervene in perioperative complications and general frailty, a universal scale to measure frailty is necessary. Many methods for determining frailty have been developed, yet there remains a need to define clinical frailty and, therefore, the most effective way to measure it. This article reviews six popular scales for measuring frailty and evaluates their clinical effectiveness demonstrated in previous studies. By identifying the most time-efficient, criteria comprehensive, and clinically effective scale, a universal scale can be implemented into standard of care and reduce complications from frailty in both non-surgical and surgical settings, especially applied to the perioperative surgical home model. We suggest further evaluation of the Edmonton Frailty Scale for inclusion in patient care. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4954808 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49548082016-08-04 The Gap Between Clinical Research and Standard of Care: A Review of Frailty Assessment Scales in Perioperative Surgical Settings Stoicea, Nicoleta Baddigam, Ramya Wajahn, Jennifer Sipes, Angela C. Arias-Morales, Carlos E. Gastaldo, Nicholas Bergese, Sergio D. Front Public Health Public Health The elderly population in the United States is increasing exponentially in tandem with risk for frailty. Frailty is described by a clinically significant state where a patient is at risk for developing complications requiring increased assistance in daily activities. Frailty syndrome studied in geriatric patients is responsible for an increased risk for falls, and increased mortality. In efforts to prepare for and to intervene in perioperative complications and general frailty, a universal scale to measure frailty is necessary. Many methods for determining frailty have been developed, yet there remains a need to define clinical frailty and, therefore, the most effective way to measure it. This article reviews six popular scales for measuring frailty and evaluates their clinical effectiveness demonstrated in previous studies. By identifying the most time-efficient, criteria comprehensive, and clinically effective scale, a universal scale can be implemented into standard of care and reduce complications from frailty in both non-surgical and surgical settings, especially applied to the perioperative surgical home model. We suggest further evaluation of the Edmonton Frailty Scale for inclusion in patient care. Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4954808/ /pubmed/27493935 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2016.00150 Text en Copyright © 2016 Stoicea, Baddigam, Wajahn, Sipes, Arias-Morales, Gastaldo and Bergese. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Public Health Stoicea, Nicoleta Baddigam, Ramya Wajahn, Jennifer Sipes, Angela C. Arias-Morales, Carlos E. Gastaldo, Nicholas Bergese, Sergio D. The Gap Between Clinical Research and Standard of Care: A Review of Frailty Assessment Scales in Perioperative Surgical Settings |
title | The Gap Between Clinical Research and Standard of Care: A Review of Frailty Assessment Scales in Perioperative Surgical Settings |
title_full | The Gap Between Clinical Research and Standard of Care: A Review of Frailty Assessment Scales in Perioperative Surgical Settings |
title_fullStr | The Gap Between Clinical Research and Standard of Care: A Review of Frailty Assessment Scales in Perioperative Surgical Settings |
title_full_unstemmed | The Gap Between Clinical Research and Standard of Care: A Review of Frailty Assessment Scales in Perioperative Surgical Settings |
title_short | The Gap Between Clinical Research and Standard of Care: A Review of Frailty Assessment Scales in Perioperative Surgical Settings |
title_sort | gap between clinical research and standard of care: a review of frailty assessment scales in perioperative surgical settings |
topic | Public Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4954808/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27493935 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2016.00150 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stoiceanicoleta thegapbetweenclinicalresearchandstandardofcareareviewoffrailtyassessmentscalesinperioperativesurgicalsettings AT baddigamramya thegapbetweenclinicalresearchandstandardofcareareviewoffrailtyassessmentscalesinperioperativesurgicalsettings AT wajahnjennifer thegapbetweenclinicalresearchandstandardofcareareviewoffrailtyassessmentscalesinperioperativesurgicalsettings AT sipesangelac thegapbetweenclinicalresearchandstandardofcareareviewoffrailtyassessmentscalesinperioperativesurgicalsettings AT ariasmoralescarlose thegapbetweenclinicalresearchandstandardofcareareviewoffrailtyassessmentscalesinperioperativesurgicalsettings AT gastaldonicholas thegapbetweenclinicalresearchandstandardofcareareviewoffrailtyassessmentscalesinperioperativesurgicalsettings AT bergesesergiod thegapbetweenclinicalresearchandstandardofcareareviewoffrailtyassessmentscalesinperioperativesurgicalsettings AT stoiceanicoleta gapbetweenclinicalresearchandstandardofcareareviewoffrailtyassessmentscalesinperioperativesurgicalsettings AT baddigamramya gapbetweenclinicalresearchandstandardofcareareviewoffrailtyassessmentscalesinperioperativesurgicalsettings AT wajahnjennifer gapbetweenclinicalresearchandstandardofcareareviewoffrailtyassessmentscalesinperioperativesurgicalsettings AT sipesangelac gapbetweenclinicalresearchandstandardofcareareviewoffrailtyassessmentscalesinperioperativesurgicalsettings AT ariasmoralescarlose gapbetweenclinicalresearchandstandardofcareareviewoffrailtyassessmentscalesinperioperativesurgicalsettings AT gastaldonicholas gapbetweenclinicalresearchandstandardofcareareviewoffrailtyassessmentscalesinperioperativesurgicalsettings AT bergesesergiod gapbetweenclinicalresearchandstandardofcareareviewoffrailtyassessmentscalesinperioperativesurgicalsettings |