Cargando…

Comparative Evaluation of Antimicrobial Efficacy of MTAD, 3% NaOCI and Propolis Against E Faecalis

AIM: The present study sought to compare the antimicrobial efficacy of 3% NaOCl, Biopure MTAD (Tulsa Dentsply, Tulsa, OK) and Brazilian ethanolic extract of propolis (EEP) against Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis). METHODOLOGY: The study utilized 55 extracted human permanent teeth with single root...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nara, Asha, Dhanu, Chandra, Prakash, Anandakrishna, Latha, Dhananjaya
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4955040/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27625552
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1049
_version_ 1782443879918731264
author Nara, Asha
Dhanu,
Chandra, Prakash
Anandakrishna, Latha
Dhananjaya,
author_facet Nara, Asha
Dhanu,
Chandra, Prakash
Anandakrishna, Latha
Dhananjaya,
author_sort Nara, Asha
collection PubMed
description AIM: The present study sought to compare the antimicrobial efficacy of 3% NaOCl, Biopure MTAD (Tulsa Dentsply, Tulsa, OK) and Brazilian ethanolic extract of propolis (EEP) against Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis). METHODOLOGY: The study utilized 55 extracted human permanent teeth with single root canal. The samples were decoronated, instrumented and sterilized. The teeth were infected with E faecalis for 48 hours. The teeth were divided randomly into 3 groups according to the irrigants used and kept in contact with the respective irrigant for 5 minutes. All the samples were incubated in brain heart infusion (BHI) broth for 96 hours. Disinfection of the samples was determined based on presence or absence of turbidity in the BHI broth 96 hours later. Statistical analysis was done using Chi-square test. RESULTS: All the samples treated with MTAD showed complete absence of turbidity, while all the 15 teeth treated with propolis showed presence of turbidity, 8 out of 15 teeth treated with NaOCl showed presence of turbidity. Statistical analysis of the data using chi-square test showed significant difference between the groups (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The study concluded that MTAD was more effective than 3% NaOCl and propolis against E. faecalis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4955040
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49550402016-09-13 Comparative Evaluation of Antimicrobial Efficacy of MTAD, 3% NaOCI and Propolis Against E Faecalis Nara, Asha Dhanu, Chandra, Prakash Anandakrishna, Latha Dhananjaya, Int J Clin Pediatr Dent Original Article AIM: The present study sought to compare the antimicrobial efficacy of 3% NaOCl, Biopure MTAD (Tulsa Dentsply, Tulsa, OK) and Brazilian ethanolic extract of propolis (EEP) against Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis). METHODOLOGY: The study utilized 55 extracted human permanent teeth with single root canal. The samples were decoronated, instrumented and sterilized. The teeth were infected with E faecalis for 48 hours. The teeth were divided randomly into 3 groups according to the irrigants used and kept in contact with the respective irrigant for 5 minutes. All the samples were incubated in brain heart infusion (BHI) broth for 96 hours. Disinfection of the samples was determined based on presence or absence of turbidity in the BHI broth 96 hours later. Statistical analysis was done using Chi-square test. RESULTS: All the samples treated with MTAD showed complete absence of turbidity, while all the 15 teeth treated with propolis showed presence of turbidity, 8 out of 15 teeth treated with NaOCl showed presence of turbidity. Statistical analysis of the data using chi-square test showed significant difference between the groups (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The study concluded that MTAD was more effective than 3% NaOCl and propolis against E. faecalis. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2010 2010-04-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4955040/ /pubmed/27625552 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1049 Text en Copyright © 2010; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
spellingShingle Original Article
Nara, Asha
Dhanu,
Chandra, Prakash
Anandakrishna, Latha
Dhananjaya,
Comparative Evaluation of Antimicrobial Efficacy of MTAD, 3% NaOCI and Propolis Against E Faecalis
title Comparative Evaluation of Antimicrobial Efficacy of MTAD, 3% NaOCI and Propolis Against E Faecalis
title_full Comparative Evaluation of Antimicrobial Efficacy of MTAD, 3% NaOCI and Propolis Against E Faecalis
title_fullStr Comparative Evaluation of Antimicrobial Efficacy of MTAD, 3% NaOCI and Propolis Against E Faecalis
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Evaluation of Antimicrobial Efficacy of MTAD, 3% NaOCI and Propolis Against E Faecalis
title_short Comparative Evaluation of Antimicrobial Efficacy of MTAD, 3% NaOCI and Propolis Against E Faecalis
title_sort comparative evaluation of antimicrobial efficacy of mtad, 3% naoci and propolis against e faecalis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4955040/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27625552
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1049
work_keys_str_mv AT naraasha comparativeevaluationofantimicrobialefficacyofmtad3naociandpropolisagainstefaecalis
AT dhanu comparativeevaluationofantimicrobialefficacyofmtad3naociandpropolisagainstefaecalis
AT chandraprakash comparativeevaluationofantimicrobialefficacyofmtad3naociandpropolisagainstefaecalis
AT anandakrishnalatha comparativeevaluationofantimicrobialefficacyofmtad3naociandpropolisagainstefaecalis
AT dhananjaya comparativeevaluationofantimicrobialefficacyofmtad3naociandpropolisagainstefaecalis