Cargando…
Implementation and reporting of causal mediation analysis in 2015: a systematic review in epidemiological studies
BACKGROUND: Causal mediation analysis is often used to understand the impact of variables along the causal pathway of an occurrence relation. How well studies apply and report the elements of causal mediation analysis remains unknown. METHODS: We systematically reviewed epidemiological studies publi...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4955118/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27439301 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-016-2163-7 |
_version_ | 1782443888696360960 |
---|---|
author | Liu, Shao-Hsien Ulbricht, Christine M. Chrysanthopoulou, Stavroula A. Lapane, Kate L. |
author_facet | Liu, Shao-Hsien Ulbricht, Christine M. Chrysanthopoulou, Stavroula A. Lapane, Kate L. |
author_sort | Liu, Shao-Hsien |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Causal mediation analysis is often used to understand the impact of variables along the causal pathway of an occurrence relation. How well studies apply and report the elements of causal mediation analysis remains unknown. METHODS: We systematically reviewed epidemiological studies published in 2015 that employed causal mediation analysis to estimate direct and indirect effects of observed associations between an exposure on an outcome. We identified potential epidemiological studies through conducting a citation search within Web of Science and a keyword search within PubMed. Two reviewers independently screened studies for eligibility. For eligible studies, one reviewer performed data extraction, and a senior epidemiologist confirmed the extracted information. Empirical application and methodological details of the technique were extracted and summarized. RESULTS: Thirteen studies were eligible for data extraction. While the majority of studies reported and identified the effects of measures, most studies lacked sufficient details on the extent to which identifiability assumptions were satisfied. Although most studies addressed issues of unmeasured confounders either from empirical approaches or sensitivity analyses, the majority did not examine the potential bias arising from the measurement error of the mediator. Some studies allowed for exposure-mediator interaction and only a few presented results from models both with and without interactions. Power calculations were scarce. CONCLUSIONS: Reporting of causal mediation analysis is varied and suboptimal. Given that the application of causal mediation analysis will likely continue to increase, developing standards of reporting of causal mediation analysis in epidemiological research would be prudent. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4955118 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49551182016-07-22 Implementation and reporting of causal mediation analysis in 2015: a systematic review in epidemiological studies Liu, Shao-Hsien Ulbricht, Christine M. Chrysanthopoulou, Stavroula A. Lapane, Kate L. BMC Res Notes Research Article BACKGROUND: Causal mediation analysis is often used to understand the impact of variables along the causal pathway of an occurrence relation. How well studies apply and report the elements of causal mediation analysis remains unknown. METHODS: We systematically reviewed epidemiological studies published in 2015 that employed causal mediation analysis to estimate direct and indirect effects of observed associations between an exposure on an outcome. We identified potential epidemiological studies through conducting a citation search within Web of Science and a keyword search within PubMed. Two reviewers independently screened studies for eligibility. For eligible studies, one reviewer performed data extraction, and a senior epidemiologist confirmed the extracted information. Empirical application and methodological details of the technique were extracted and summarized. RESULTS: Thirteen studies were eligible for data extraction. While the majority of studies reported and identified the effects of measures, most studies lacked sufficient details on the extent to which identifiability assumptions were satisfied. Although most studies addressed issues of unmeasured confounders either from empirical approaches or sensitivity analyses, the majority did not examine the potential bias arising from the measurement error of the mediator. Some studies allowed for exposure-mediator interaction and only a few presented results from models both with and without interactions. Power calculations were scarce. CONCLUSIONS: Reporting of causal mediation analysis is varied and suboptimal. Given that the application of causal mediation analysis will likely continue to increase, developing standards of reporting of causal mediation analysis in epidemiological research would be prudent. BioMed Central 2016-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4955118/ /pubmed/27439301 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-016-2163-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Liu, Shao-Hsien Ulbricht, Christine M. Chrysanthopoulou, Stavroula A. Lapane, Kate L. Implementation and reporting of causal mediation analysis in 2015: a systematic review in epidemiological studies |
title | Implementation and reporting of causal mediation analysis in 2015: a systematic review in epidemiological studies |
title_full | Implementation and reporting of causal mediation analysis in 2015: a systematic review in epidemiological studies |
title_fullStr | Implementation and reporting of causal mediation analysis in 2015: a systematic review in epidemiological studies |
title_full_unstemmed | Implementation and reporting of causal mediation analysis in 2015: a systematic review in epidemiological studies |
title_short | Implementation and reporting of causal mediation analysis in 2015: a systematic review in epidemiological studies |
title_sort | implementation and reporting of causal mediation analysis in 2015: a systematic review in epidemiological studies |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4955118/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27439301 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-016-2163-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liushaohsien implementationandreportingofcausalmediationanalysisin2015asystematicreviewinepidemiologicalstudies AT ulbrichtchristinem implementationandreportingofcausalmediationanalysisin2015asystematicreviewinepidemiologicalstudies AT chrysanthopouloustavroulaa implementationandreportingofcausalmediationanalysisin2015asystematicreviewinepidemiologicalstudies AT lapanekatel implementationandreportingofcausalmediationanalysisin2015asystematicreviewinepidemiologicalstudies |