Cargando…

A cross sectional evaluation of an alcohol intervention targeting young university students

BACKGROUND: Hazardous drinking has been found to be higher among young university students compared to their non-university peers. Although young university students are exposed to new and exciting experiences, including greater availability and emphasis on social functions involving alcohol there a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Burns, Sharyn, Jancey, Jonine, Crawford, Gemma, Hallett, Jonathan, Portsmouth, Linda, Longo, Janelle
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4955165/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27439308
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3314-4
_version_ 1782443899153809408
author Burns, Sharyn
Jancey, Jonine
Crawford, Gemma
Hallett, Jonathan
Portsmouth, Linda
Longo, Janelle
author_facet Burns, Sharyn
Jancey, Jonine
Crawford, Gemma
Hallett, Jonathan
Portsmouth, Linda
Longo, Janelle
author_sort Burns, Sharyn
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Hazardous drinking has been found to be higher among young university students compared to their non-university peers. Although young university students are exposed to new and exciting experiences, including greater availability and emphasis on social functions involving alcohol there are few multi strategy comprehensive interventions aimed at reducing alcohol-related harms. METHODS: Random cross sectional online surveys were administered to 18–24 year old students studying at the main campus of a large metropolitan university in Perth, Western Australia. Prior to the completion of the second survey an alcohol intervention was implemented on campus. Completed surveys were received from 2465 (Baseline; T1) and 2422 (Post Year 1: T2) students. Students who consumed alcohol in the past 12 months were categorised as low risk or hazardous drinkers using the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT). Due to the cross sectional nature of the two samples two-tailed two-proportion z-test and two sample t-tests were employed to determine statistical significance between the two time periods for categorical and continuous variables respectively. RESULTS: At T1 and T2 89.1 % and 87.2 % of the total sample reported drinking alcohol in the past month respectively. Hazardous levels of alcohol consumption reduced slightly between T1 (39.7 %) and T2 (38 %). In both time periods hazardous drinkers reported significantly higher mean scores for experienced harm, second-hand harm and witnessed harm scores compared to low risk drinkers (p <0.001). Hazardous drinkers were significantly more likely to experience academic problems due to their alcohol consumption and to report more positive alcohol expectations than low risk drinkers at both time periods (p <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Harms and problems for students who report hazardous drinking are of concern and efforts should be made to ensure integrated and targeted strategies reach higher risk students and focus on specific issues such as driving while intoxicated and alcohol related unplanned sexual activity. However there is also a need for universal strategies targeting all students and low risk drinkers as they too are exposed to alcohol harms within the drinking and social environment. Changing the culture of the university environment is a long term aim and to effect change a sustained combination of organisational actions, partnerships and educational actions is required.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4955165
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49551652016-07-22 A cross sectional evaluation of an alcohol intervention targeting young university students Burns, Sharyn Jancey, Jonine Crawford, Gemma Hallett, Jonathan Portsmouth, Linda Longo, Janelle BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Hazardous drinking has been found to be higher among young university students compared to their non-university peers. Although young university students are exposed to new and exciting experiences, including greater availability and emphasis on social functions involving alcohol there are few multi strategy comprehensive interventions aimed at reducing alcohol-related harms. METHODS: Random cross sectional online surveys were administered to 18–24 year old students studying at the main campus of a large metropolitan university in Perth, Western Australia. Prior to the completion of the second survey an alcohol intervention was implemented on campus. Completed surveys were received from 2465 (Baseline; T1) and 2422 (Post Year 1: T2) students. Students who consumed alcohol in the past 12 months were categorised as low risk or hazardous drinkers using the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT). Due to the cross sectional nature of the two samples two-tailed two-proportion z-test and two sample t-tests were employed to determine statistical significance between the two time periods for categorical and continuous variables respectively. RESULTS: At T1 and T2 89.1 % and 87.2 % of the total sample reported drinking alcohol in the past month respectively. Hazardous levels of alcohol consumption reduced slightly between T1 (39.7 %) and T2 (38 %). In both time periods hazardous drinkers reported significantly higher mean scores for experienced harm, second-hand harm and witnessed harm scores compared to low risk drinkers (p <0.001). Hazardous drinkers were significantly more likely to experience academic problems due to their alcohol consumption and to report more positive alcohol expectations than low risk drinkers at both time periods (p <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Harms and problems for students who report hazardous drinking are of concern and efforts should be made to ensure integrated and targeted strategies reach higher risk students and focus on specific issues such as driving while intoxicated and alcohol related unplanned sexual activity. However there is also a need for universal strategies targeting all students and low risk drinkers as they too are exposed to alcohol harms within the drinking and social environment. Changing the culture of the university environment is a long term aim and to effect change a sustained combination of organisational actions, partnerships and educational actions is required. BioMed Central 2016-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4955165/ /pubmed/27439308 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3314-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Burns, Sharyn
Jancey, Jonine
Crawford, Gemma
Hallett, Jonathan
Portsmouth, Linda
Longo, Janelle
A cross sectional evaluation of an alcohol intervention targeting young university students
title A cross sectional evaluation of an alcohol intervention targeting young university students
title_full A cross sectional evaluation of an alcohol intervention targeting young university students
title_fullStr A cross sectional evaluation of an alcohol intervention targeting young university students
title_full_unstemmed A cross sectional evaluation of an alcohol intervention targeting young university students
title_short A cross sectional evaluation of an alcohol intervention targeting young university students
title_sort cross sectional evaluation of an alcohol intervention targeting young university students
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4955165/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27439308
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3314-4
work_keys_str_mv AT burnssharyn acrosssectionalevaluationofanalcoholinterventiontargetingyounguniversitystudents
AT janceyjonine acrosssectionalevaluationofanalcoholinterventiontargetingyounguniversitystudents
AT crawfordgemma acrosssectionalevaluationofanalcoholinterventiontargetingyounguniversitystudents
AT hallettjonathan acrosssectionalevaluationofanalcoholinterventiontargetingyounguniversitystudents
AT portsmouthlinda acrosssectionalevaluationofanalcoholinterventiontargetingyounguniversitystudents
AT longojanelle acrosssectionalevaluationofanalcoholinterventiontargetingyounguniversitystudents
AT burnssharyn crosssectionalevaluationofanalcoholinterventiontargetingyounguniversitystudents
AT janceyjonine crosssectionalevaluationofanalcoholinterventiontargetingyounguniversitystudents
AT crawfordgemma crosssectionalevaluationofanalcoholinterventiontargetingyounguniversitystudents
AT hallettjonathan crosssectionalevaluationofanalcoholinterventiontargetingyounguniversitystudents
AT portsmouthlinda crosssectionalevaluationofanalcoholinterventiontargetingyounguniversitystudents
AT longojanelle crosssectionalevaluationofanalcoholinterventiontargetingyounguniversitystudents