Cargando…
Barriers to HIV and sexual and reproductive health care for female sex workers in Tete, Mozambique: results from a cross-sectional survey and focus group discussions
BACKGROUND: In the context of an operational research project in Tete, Mozambique, use of, and barriers to, HIV and sexual and reproductive health (HIV/SRH) commodities and services for female sex workers (FSWs) were assessed as part of a baseline situational analysis. METHODS: In a cross-sectional...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4955167/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27440108 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3305-5 |
_version_ | 1782443899627765760 |
---|---|
author | Lafort, Yves Lessitala, Faustino Candrinho, Balthazar Greener, Letitia Greener, Ross Beksinska, Mags Smit, Jenni A. Chersich, Matthew Delva, Wim |
author_facet | Lafort, Yves Lessitala, Faustino Candrinho, Balthazar Greener, Letitia Greener, Ross Beksinska, Mags Smit, Jenni A. Chersich, Matthew Delva, Wim |
author_sort | Lafort, Yves |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In the context of an operational research project in Tete, Mozambique, use of, and barriers to, HIV and sexual and reproductive health (HIV/SRH) commodities and services for female sex workers (FSWs) were assessed as part of a baseline situational analysis. METHODS: In a cross-sectional survey 311 FSWs were recruited using respondent driven sampling and interviewed face-to-face, and three focus group discussions were held with respectively 6 full-time Mozambican, 7 occasional Mozambican and 9 full-time Zimbabwean FSWs, to investigate use of, and barriers to, HIV/SRH care. RESULTS: The cross-sectional survey showed that 71 % of FSWs used non-barrier contraception, 78 % sought care for their last sexually transmitted infection episode, 51 % of HIV-negative FSWs was tested for HIV in the last 6 months, 83 % of HIV-positive FSWs were in HIV care, 55 % sought help at a health facility for their last unwanted pregnancy and 48 % after sexual assault, and none was ever screened for cervical cancer. Local public health facilities were by far the most common place where care was sought, followed by an NGO-operated clinic targeting FSWs, and places outside the Tete area. In the focus group discussions, FSWs expressed dissatisfaction with the public health services, as a result of being asked for bribes, being badly attended by some care providers, stigmatisation and breaches of confidentiality. The service most lacking was said to be termination of unwanted pregnancies. CONCLUSIONS: The use of most HIV and SRH services is insufficient in this FSW population. The public health sector is the main provider, but access is hampered by several barriers. The reach of a FSW-specific NGO clinic is limited. Access to, and use of, HIV and SRH services should be improved by reducing barriers at public health facilities, broadening the range of services and expanding the reach of the targeted NGO clinic. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4955167 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49551672016-07-22 Barriers to HIV and sexual and reproductive health care for female sex workers in Tete, Mozambique: results from a cross-sectional survey and focus group discussions Lafort, Yves Lessitala, Faustino Candrinho, Balthazar Greener, Letitia Greener, Ross Beksinska, Mags Smit, Jenni A. Chersich, Matthew Delva, Wim BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: In the context of an operational research project in Tete, Mozambique, use of, and barriers to, HIV and sexual and reproductive health (HIV/SRH) commodities and services for female sex workers (FSWs) were assessed as part of a baseline situational analysis. METHODS: In a cross-sectional survey 311 FSWs were recruited using respondent driven sampling and interviewed face-to-face, and three focus group discussions were held with respectively 6 full-time Mozambican, 7 occasional Mozambican and 9 full-time Zimbabwean FSWs, to investigate use of, and barriers to, HIV/SRH care. RESULTS: The cross-sectional survey showed that 71 % of FSWs used non-barrier contraception, 78 % sought care for their last sexually transmitted infection episode, 51 % of HIV-negative FSWs was tested for HIV in the last 6 months, 83 % of HIV-positive FSWs were in HIV care, 55 % sought help at a health facility for their last unwanted pregnancy and 48 % after sexual assault, and none was ever screened for cervical cancer. Local public health facilities were by far the most common place where care was sought, followed by an NGO-operated clinic targeting FSWs, and places outside the Tete area. In the focus group discussions, FSWs expressed dissatisfaction with the public health services, as a result of being asked for bribes, being badly attended by some care providers, stigmatisation and breaches of confidentiality. The service most lacking was said to be termination of unwanted pregnancies. CONCLUSIONS: The use of most HIV and SRH services is insufficient in this FSW population. The public health sector is the main provider, but access is hampered by several barriers. The reach of a FSW-specific NGO clinic is limited. Access to, and use of, HIV and SRH services should be improved by reducing barriers at public health facilities, broadening the range of services and expanding the reach of the targeted NGO clinic. BioMed Central 2016-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4955167/ /pubmed/27440108 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3305-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Lafort, Yves Lessitala, Faustino Candrinho, Balthazar Greener, Letitia Greener, Ross Beksinska, Mags Smit, Jenni A. Chersich, Matthew Delva, Wim Barriers to HIV and sexual and reproductive health care for female sex workers in Tete, Mozambique: results from a cross-sectional survey and focus group discussions |
title | Barriers to HIV and sexual and reproductive health care for female sex workers in Tete, Mozambique: results from a cross-sectional survey and focus group discussions |
title_full | Barriers to HIV and sexual and reproductive health care for female sex workers in Tete, Mozambique: results from a cross-sectional survey and focus group discussions |
title_fullStr | Barriers to HIV and sexual and reproductive health care for female sex workers in Tete, Mozambique: results from a cross-sectional survey and focus group discussions |
title_full_unstemmed | Barriers to HIV and sexual and reproductive health care for female sex workers in Tete, Mozambique: results from a cross-sectional survey and focus group discussions |
title_short | Barriers to HIV and sexual and reproductive health care for female sex workers in Tete, Mozambique: results from a cross-sectional survey and focus group discussions |
title_sort | barriers to hiv and sexual and reproductive health care for female sex workers in tete, mozambique: results from a cross-sectional survey and focus group discussions |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4955167/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27440108 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3305-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lafortyves barrierstohivandsexualandreproductivehealthcareforfemalesexworkersintetemozambiqueresultsfromacrosssectionalsurveyandfocusgroupdiscussions AT lessitalafaustino barrierstohivandsexualandreproductivehealthcareforfemalesexworkersintetemozambiqueresultsfromacrosssectionalsurveyandfocusgroupdiscussions AT candrinhobalthazar barrierstohivandsexualandreproductivehealthcareforfemalesexworkersintetemozambiqueresultsfromacrosssectionalsurveyandfocusgroupdiscussions AT greenerletitia barrierstohivandsexualandreproductivehealthcareforfemalesexworkersintetemozambiqueresultsfromacrosssectionalsurveyandfocusgroupdiscussions AT greenerross barrierstohivandsexualandreproductivehealthcareforfemalesexworkersintetemozambiqueresultsfromacrosssectionalsurveyandfocusgroupdiscussions AT beksinskamags barrierstohivandsexualandreproductivehealthcareforfemalesexworkersintetemozambiqueresultsfromacrosssectionalsurveyandfocusgroupdiscussions AT smitjennia barrierstohivandsexualandreproductivehealthcareforfemalesexworkersintetemozambiqueresultsfromacrosssectionalsurveyandfocusgroupdiscussions AT chersichmatthew barrierstohivandsexualandreproductivehealthcareforfemalesexworkersintetemozambiqueresultsfromacrosssectionalsurveyandfocusgroupdiscussions AT delvawim barrierstohivandsexualandreproductivehealthcareforfemalesexworkersintetemozambiqueresultsfromacrosssectionalsurveyandfocusgroupdiscussions |