Cargando…

Clinician time used for decision making: a best case workflow study using cardiovascular risk assessments and Ask Mayo Expert algorithmic care process models

BACKGROUND: Risk calculation is increasingly used in lipid management, congestive heart failure, and atrial fibrillation. The risk scores are then used for decisions about statin use, anticoagulation, and implantable defibrillator use. Calculating risks for patients and making decisions based on the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: North, Frederick, Fox, Samuel, Chaudhry, Rajeev
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4955236/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27439359
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-016-0334-z
_version_ 1782443915493769216
author North, Frederick
Fox, Samuel
Chaudhry, Rajeev
author_facet North, Frederick
Fox, Samuel
Chaudhry, Rajeev
author_sort North, Frederick
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Risk calculation is increasingly used in lipid management, congestive heart failure, and atrial fibrillation. The risk scores are then used for decisions about statin use, anticoagulation, and implantable defibrillator use. Calculating risks for patients and making decisions based on these risks is often done at the point of care and is an additional time burden for clinicians that can be decreased by automating the tasks and using clinical decision-making support. METHODS: Using Morae Recorder software, we timed 30 healthcare providers tasked with calculating the overall risk of cardiovascular events, sudden death in heart failure, and thrombotic event risk in atrial fibrillation. Risk calculators used were the American College of Cardiology Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease risk calculator (AHA-ASCVD risk), Seattle Heart Failure Model (SHFM risk), and CHA(2)DS(2)VASc. We also timed the 30 providers using Ask Mayo Expert care process models for lipid management, heart failure management, and atrial fibrillation management based on the calculated risk scores. We used the Mayo Clinic primary care panel to estimate time for calculating an entire panel risk. RESULTS: Mean provider times to complete the CHA(2)DS(2)VASc, AHA-ASCVD risk, and SHFM were 36, 45, and 171 s respectively. For decision making about atrial fibrillation, lipids, and heart failure, the mean times (including risk calculations) were 85, 110, and 347 s respectively. CONCLUSION: Even under best case circumstances, providers take a significant amount of time to complete risk assessments. For a complete panel of patients this can lead to hours of time required to make decisions about prescribing statins, use of anticoagulation, and medications for heart failure. Informatics solutions are needed to capture data in the medical record and serve up automatically calculated risk assessments to physicians and other providers at the point of care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4955236
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49552362016-07-22 Clinician time used for decision making: a best case workflow study using cardiovascular risk assessments and Ask Mayo Expert algorithmic care process models North, Frederick Fox, Samuel Chaudhry, Rajeev BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Research Article BACKGROUND: Risk calculation is increasingly used in lipid management, congestive heart failure, and atrial fibrillation. The risk scores are then used for decisions about statin use, anticoagulation, and implantable defibrillator use. Calculating risks for patients and making decisions based on these risks is often done at the point of care and is an additional time burden for clinicians that can be decreased by automating the tasks and using clinical decision-making support. METHODS: Using Morae Recorder software, we timed 30 healthcare providers tasked with calculating the overall risk of cardiovascular events, sudden death in heart failure, and thrombotic event risk in atrial fibrillation. Risk calculators used were the American College of Cardiology Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease risk calculator (AHA-ASCVD risk), Seattle Heart Failure Model (SHFM risk), and CHA(2)DS(2)VASc. We also timed the 30 providers using Ask Mayo Expert care process models for lipid management, heart failure management, and atrial fibrillation management based on the calculated risk scores. We used the Mayo Clinic primary care panel to estimate time for calculating an entire panel risk. RESULTS: Mean provider times to complete the CHA(2)DS(2)VASc, AHA-ASCVD risk, and SHFM were 36, 45, and 171 s respectively. For decision making about atrial fibrillation, lipids, and heart failure, the mean times (including risk calculations) were 85, 110, and 347 s respectively. CONCLUSION: Even under best case circumstances, providers take a significant amount of time to complete risk assessments. For a complete panel of patients this can lead to hours of time required to make decisions about prescribing statins, use of anticoagulation, and medications for heart failure. Informatics solutions are needed to capture data in the medical record and serve up automatically calculated risk assessments to physicians and other providers at the point of care. BioMed Central 2016-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4955236/ /pubmed/27439359 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-016-0334-z Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
North, Frederick
Fox, Samuel
Chaudhry, Rajeev
Clinician time used for decision making: a best case workflow study using cardiovascular risk assessments and Ask Mayo Expert algorithmic care process models
title Clinician time used for decision making: a best case workflow study using cardiovascular risk assessments and Ask Mayo Expert algorithmic care process models
title_full Clinician time used for decision making: a best case workflow study using cardiovascular risk assessments and Ask Mayo Expert algorithmic care process models
title_fullStr Clinician time used for decision making: a best case workflow study using cardiovascular risk assessments and Ask Mayo Expert algorithmic care process models
title_full_unstemmed Clinician time used for decision making: a best case workflow study using cardiovascular risk assessments and Ask Mayo Expert algorithmic care process models
title_short Clinician time used for decision making: a best case workflow study using cardiovascular risk assessments and Ask Mayo Expert algorithmic care process models
title_sort clinician time used for decision making: a best case workflow study using cardiovascular risk assessments and ask mayo expert algorithmic care process models
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4955236/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27439359
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-016-0334-z
work_keys_str_mv AT northfrederick cliniciantimeusedfordecisionmakingabestcaseworkflowstudyusingcardiovascularriskassessmentsandaskmayoexpertalgorithmiccareprocessmodels
AT foxsamuel cliniciantimeusedfordecisionmakingabestcaseworkflowstudyusingcardiovascularriskassessmentsandaskmayoexpertalgorithmiccareprocessmodels
AT chaudhryrajeev cliniciantimeusedfordecisionmakingabestcaseworkflowstudyusingcardiovascularriskassessmentsandaskmayoexpertalgorithmiccareprocessmodels