Cargando…

Prognostic impact of AJCC response criteria for neoadjuvant chemotherapy in stage II/III breast cancer patients: breast cancer subtype analyses

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is a standard treatment for stage II/III breast cancer patients, and response to NAC is a useful prognostic marker. Since its introduction, 6–8 cycles of NAC has become the standard regimen to improve the outcome of these patients. The purpose of this study...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Yaewon, Im, Seock-Ah, Keam, Bhumsuk, Lee, Kyung‑Hun, Kim, Tae‑Yong, Suh, Koung Jin, Ryu, Han Suk, Moon, Hyeong-Gon, Han, Sae‑Won, Oh, Do‑Youn, Han, Wonshik, Kim, Tae‑You, Park, In Ae, Noh, Dong-Young
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4955253/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27444430
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-016-2500-1
_version_ 1782443919333654528
author Yang, Yaewon
Im, Seock-Ah
Keam, Bhumsuk
Lee, Kyung‑Hun
Kim, Tae‑Yong
Suh, Koung Jin
Ryu, Han Suk
Moon, Hyeong-Gon
Han, Sae‑Won
Oh, Do‑Youn
Han, Wonshik
Kim, Tae‑You
Park, In Ae
Noh, Dong-Young
author_facet Yang, Yaewon
Im, Seock-Ah
Keam, Bhumsuk
Lee, Kyung‑Hun
Kim, Tae‑Yong
Suh, Koung Jin
Ryu, Han Suk
Moon, Hyeong-Gon
Han, Sae‑Won
Oh, Do‑Youn
Han, Wonshik
Kim, Tae‑You
Park, In Ae
Noh, Dong-Young
author_sort Yang, Yaewon
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is a standard treatment for stage II/III breast cancer patients, and response to NAC is a useful prognostic marker. Since its introduction, 6–8 cycles of NAC has become the standard regimen to improve the outcome of these patients. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the prognostic impact of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) response criteria and this tool’s usefulness in four different breast cancer subtypes. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of clinical stage II/III breast cancer patients who received NAC of more than 6 cycles. Response after NAC and the clinicopathological factors were reviewed. AJCC response criteria for NAC were adopted from the AJCC Manual, 7th edition: complete response (CR), partial response (PR), and no response (NR). RESULTS: A total of 183 patients were enrolled; 22 (12.0 %), 123 (67.2 %), and 38 (20.8 %) patients showed CR, PR, and NR, respectively. The AJCC response was significantly associated with relapse-free survival (RFS) (P < 0.001), whereas pathologic CR (pCR), the current gold standard for response evaluation for NAC, was not (P = 0.140). AJCC response was a significant prognostic factor for RFS in all four breast cancer subtypes, namely luminal A (P = 0.006), luminal B (P = 0.001), HER-2 enriched (P = 0.039), and triple-negative breast cancer (P = 0.035). CONCLUSIONS: The AJCC response criteria represent a simple and easily reproducible tool for response evaluation of NAC patients and a useful clinical prognostic marker for RFS. These criteria also have a prognostic impact in all four breast cancer subtypes, including luminal A in which pCR has a limited role.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4955253
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49552532016-07-22 Prognostic impact of AJCC response criteria for neoadjuvant chemotherapy in stage II/III breast cancer patients: breast cancer subtype analyses Yang, Yaewon Im, Seock-Ah Keam, Bhumsuk Lee, Kyung‑Hun Kim, Tae‑Yong Suh, Koung Jin Ryu, Han Suk Moon, Hyeong-Gon Han, Sae‑Won Oh, Do‑Youn Han, Wonshik Kim, Tae‑You Park, In Ae Noh, Dong-Young BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is a standard treatment for stage II/III breast cancer patients, and response to NAC is a useful prognostic marker. Since its introduction, 6–8 cycles of NAC has become the standard regimen to improve the outcome of these patients. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the prognostic impact of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) response criteria and this tool’s usefulness in four different breast cancer subtypes. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of clinical stage II/III breast cancer patients who received NAC of more than 6 cycles. Response after NAC and the clinicopathological factors were reviewed. AJCC response criteria for NAC were adopted from the AJCC Manual, 7th edition: complete response (CR), partial response (PR), and no response (NR). RESULTS: A total of 183 patients were enrolled; 22 (12.0 %), 123 (67.2 %), and 38 (20.8 %) patients showed CR, PR, and NR, respectively. The AJCC response was significantly associated with relapse-free survival (RFS) (P < 0.001), whereas pathologic CR (pCR), the current gold standard for response evaluation for NAC, was not (P = 0.140). AJCC response was a significant prognostic factor for RFS in all four breast cancer subtypes, namely luminal A (P = 0.006), luminal B (P = 0.001), HER-2 enriched (P = 0.039), and triple-negative breast cancer (P = 0.035). CONCLUSIONS: The AJCC response criteria represent a simple and easily reproducible tool for response evaluation of NAC patients and a useful clinical prognostic marker for RFS. These criteria also have a prognostic impact in all four breast cancer subtypes, including luminal A in which pCR has a limited role. BioMed Central 2016-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4955253/ /pubmed/27444430 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-016-2500-1 Text en © Yang et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Yang, Yaewon
Im, Seock-Ah
Keam, Bhumsuk
Lee, Kyung‑Hun
Kim, Tae‑Yong
Suh, Koung Jin
Ryu, Han Suk
Moon, Hyeong-Gon
Han, Sae‑Won
Oh, Do‑Youn
Han, Wonshik
Kim, Tae‑You
Park, In Ae
Noh, Dong-Young
Prognostic impact of AJCC response criteria for neoadjuvant chemotherapy in stage II/III breast cancer patients: breast cancer subtype analyses
title Prognostic impact of AJCC response criteria for neoadjuvant chemotherapy in stage II/III breast cancer patients: breast cancer subtype analyses
title_full Prognostic impact of AJCC response criteria for neoadjuvant chemotherapy in stage II/III breast cancer patients: breast cancer subtype analyses
title_fullStr Prognostic impact of AJCC response criteria for neoadjuvant chemotherapy in stage II/III breast cancer patients: breast cancer subtype analyses
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic impact of AJCC response criteria for neoadjuvant chemotherapy in stage II/III breast cancer patients: breast cancer subtype analyses
title_short Prognostic impact of AJCC response criteria for neoadjuvant chemotherapy in stage II/III breast cancer patients: breast cancer subtype analyses
title_sort prognostic impact of ajcc response criteria for neoadjuvant chemotherapy in stage ii/iii breast cancer patients: breast cancer subtype analyses
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4955253/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27444430
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-016-2500-1
work_keys_str_mv AT yangyaewon prognosticimpactofajccresponsecriteriaforneoadjuvantchemotherapyinstageiiiiibreastcancerpatientsbreastcancersubtypeanalyses
AT imseockah prognosticimpactofajccresponsecriteriaforneoadjuvantchemotherapyinstageiiiiibreastcancerpatientsbreastcancersubtypeanalyses
AT keambhumsuk prognosticimpactofajccresponsecriteriaforneoadjuvantchemotherapyinstageiiiiibreastcancerpatientsbreastcancersubtypeanalyses
AT leekyunghun prognosticimpactofajccresponsecriteriaforneoadjuvantchemotherapyinstageiiiiibreastcancerpatientsbreastcancersubtypeanalyses
AT kimtaeyong prognosticimpactofajccresponsecriteriaforneoadjuvantchemotherapyinstageiiiiibreastcancerpatientsbreastcancersubtypeanalyses
AT suhkoungjin prognosticimpactofajccresponsecriteriaforneoadjuvantchemotherapyinstageiiiiibreastcancerpatientsbreastcancersubtypeanalyses
AT ryuhansuk prognosticimpactofajccresponsecriteriaforneoadjuvantchemotherapyinstageiiiiibreastcancerpatientsbreastcancersubtypeanalyses
AT moonhyeonggon prognosticimpactofajccresponsecriteriaforneoadjuvantchemotherapyinstageiiiiibreastcancerpatientsbreastcancersubtypeanalyses
AT hansaewon prognosticimpactofajccresponsecriteriaforneoadjuvantchemotherapyinstageiiiiibreastcancerpatientsbreastcancersubtypeanalyses
AT ohdoyoun prognosticimpactofajccresponsecriteriaforneoadjuvantchemotherapyinstageiiiiibreastcancerpatientsbreastcancersubtypeanalyses
AT hanwonshik prognosticimpactofajccresponsecriteriaforneoadjuvantchemotherapyinstageiiiiibreastcancerpatientsbreastcancersubtypeanalyses
AT kimtaeyou prognosticimpactofajccresponsecriteriaforneoadjuvantchemotherapyinstageiiiiibreastcancerpatientsbreastcancersubtypeanalyses
AT parkinae prognosticimpactofajccresponsecriteriaforneoadjuvantchemotherapyinstageiiiiibreastcancerpatientsbreastcancersubtypeanalyses
AT nohdongyoung prognosticimpactofajccresponsecriteriaforneoadjuvantchemotherapyinstageiiiiibreastcancerpatientsbreastcancersubtypeanalyses