Cargando…
Prognostic impact of AJCC response criteria for neoadjuvant chemotherapy in stage II/III breast cancer patients: breast cancer subtype analyses
BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is a standard treatment for stage II/III breast cancer patients, and response to NAC is a useful prognostic marker. Since its introduction, 6–8 cycles of NAC has become the standard regimen to improve the outcome of these patients. The purpose of this study...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4955253/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27444430 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-016-2500-1 |
_version_ | 1782443919333654528 |
---|---|
author | Yang, Yaewon Im, Seock-Ah Keam, Bhumsuk Lee, Kyung‑Hun Kim, Tae‑Yong Suh, Koung Jin Ryu, Han Suk Moon, Hyeong-Gon Han, Sae‑Won Oh, Do‑Youn Han, Wonshik Kim, Tae‑You Park, In Ae Noh, Dong-Young |
author_facet | Yang, Yaewon Im, Seock-Ah Keam, Bhumsuk Lee, Kyung‑Hun Kim, Tae‑Yong Suh, Koung Jin Ryu, Han Suk Moon, Hyeong-Gon Han, Sae‑Won Oh, Do‑Youn Han, Wonshik Kim, Tae‑You Park, In Ae Noh, Dong-Young |
author_sort | Yang, Yaewon |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is a standard treatment for stage II/III breast cancer patients, and response to NAC is a useful prognostic marker. Since its introduction, 6–8 cycles of NAC has become the standard regimen to improve the outcome of these patients. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the prognostic impact of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) response criteria and this tool’s usefulness in four different breast cancer subtypes. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of clinical stage II/III breast cancer patients who received NAC of more than 6 cycles. Response after NAC and the clinicopathological factors were reviewed. AJCC response criteria for NAC were adopted from the AJCC Manual, 7th edition: complete response (CR), partial response (PR), and no response (NR). RESULTS: A total of 183 patients were enrolled; 22 (12.0 %), 123 (67.2 %), and 38 (20.8 %) patients showed CR, PR, and NR, respectively. The AJCC response was significantly associated with relapse-free survival (RFS) (P < 0.001), whereas pathologic CR (pCR), the current gold standard for response evaluation for NAC, was not (P = 0.140). AJCC response was a significant prognostic factor for RFS in all four breast cancer subtypes, namely luminal A (P = 0.006), luminal B (P = 0.001), HER-2 enriched (P = 0.039), and triple-negative breast cancer (P = 0.035). CONCLUSIONS: The AJCC response criteria represent a simple and easily reproducible tool for response evaluation of NAC patients and a useful clinical prognostic marker for RFS. These criteria also have a prognostic impact in all four breast cancer subtypes, including luminal A in which pCR has a limited role. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4955253 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49552532016-07-22 Prognostic impact of AJCC response criteria for neoadjuvant chemotherapy in stage II/III breast cancer patients: breast cancer subtype analyses Yang, Yaewon Im, Seock-Ah Keam, Bhumsuk Lee, Kyung‑Hun Kim, Tae‑Yong Suh, Koung Jin Ryu, Han Suk Moon, Hyeong-Gon Han, Sae‑Won Oh, Do‑Youn Han, Wonshik Kim, Tae‑You Park, In Ae Noh, Dong-Young BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is a standard treatment for stage II/III breast cancer patients, and response to NAC is a useful prognostic marker. Since its introduction, 6–8 cycles of NAC has become the standard regimen to improve the outcome of these patients. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the prognostic impact of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) response criteria and this tool’s usefulness in four different breast cancer subtypes. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of clinical stage II/III breast cancer patients who received NAC of more than 6 cycles. Response after NAC and the clinicopathological factors were reviewed. AJCC response criteria for NAC were adopted from the AJCC Manual, 7th edition: complete response (CR), partial response (PR), and no response (NR). RESULTS: A total of 183 patients were enrolled; 22 (12.0 %), 123 (67.2 %), and 38 (20.8 %) patients showed CR, PR, and NR, respectively. The AJCC response was significantly associated with relapse-free survival (RFS) (P < 0.001), whereas pathologic CR (pCR), the current gold standard for response evaluation for NAC, was not (P = 0.140). AJCC response was a significant prognostic factor for RFS in all four breast cancer subtypes, namely luminal A (P = 0.006), luminal B (P = 0.001), HER-2 enriched (P = 0.039), and triple-negative breast cancer (P = 0.035). CONCLUSIONS: The AJCC response criteria represent a simple and easily reproducible tool for response evaluation of NAC patients and a useful clinical prognostic marker for RFS. These criteria also have a prognostic impact in all four breast cancer subtypes, including luminal A in which pCR has a limited role. BioMed Central 2016-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4955253/ /pubmed/27444430 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-016-2500-1 Text en © Yang et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Yang, Yaewon Im, Seock-Ah Keam, Bhumsuk Lee, Kyung‑Hun Kim, Tae‑Yong Suh, Koung Jin Ryu, Han Suk Moon, Hyeong-Gon Han, Sae‑Won Oh, Do‑Youn Han, Wonshik Kim, Tae‑You Park, In Ae Noh, Dong-Young Prognostic impact of AJCC response criteria for neoadjuvant chemotherapy in stage II/III breast cancer patients: breast cancer subtype analyses |
title | Prognostic impact of AJCC response criteria for neoadjuvant chemotherapy in stage II/III breast cancer patients: breast cancer subtype analyses |
title_full | Prognostic impact of AJCC response criteria for neoadjuvant chemotherapy in stage II/III breast cancer patients: breast cancer subtype analyses |
title_fullStr | Prognostic impact of AJCC response criteria for neoadjuvant chemotherapy in stage II/III breast cancer patients: breast cancer subtype analyses |
title_full_unstemmed | Prognostic impact of AJCC response criteria for neoadjuvant chemotherapy in stage II/III breast cancer patients: breast cancer subtype analyses |
title_short | Prognostic impact of AJCC response criteria for neoadjuvant chemotherapy in stage II/III breast cancer patients: breast cancer subtype analyses |
title_sort | prognostic impact of ajcc response criteria for neoadjuvant chemotherapy in stage ii/iii breast cancer patients: breast cancer subtype analyses |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4955253/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27444430 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-016-2500-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yangyaewon prognosticimpactofajccresponsecriteriaforneoadjuvantchemotherapyinstageiiiiibreastcancerpatientsbreastcancersubtypeanalyses AT imseockah prognosticimpactofajccresponsecriteriaforneoadjuvantchemotherapyinstageiiiiibreastcancerpatientsbreastcancersubtypeanalyses AT keambhumsuk prognosticimpactofajccresponsecriteriaforneoadjuvantchemotherapyinstageiiiiibreastcancerpatientsbreastcancersubtypeanalyses AT leekyunghun prognosticimpactofajccresponsecriteriaforneoadjuvantchemotherapyinstageiiiiibreastcancerpatientsbreastcancersubtypeanalyses AT kimtaeyong prognosticimpactofajccresponsecriteriaforneoadjuvantchemotherapyinstageiiiiibreastcancerpatientsbreastcancersubtypeanalyses AT suhkoungjin prognosticimpactofajccresponsecriteriaforneoadjuvantchemotherapyinstageiiiiibreastcancerpatientsbreastcancersubtypeanalyses AT ryuhansuk prognosticimpactofajccresponsecriteriaforneoadjuvantchemotherapyinstageiiiiibreastcancerpatientsbreastcancersubtypeanalyses AT moonhyeonggon prognosticimpactofajccresponsecriteriaforneoadjuvantchemotherapyinstageiiiiibreastcancerpatientsbreastcancersubtypeanalyses AT hansaewon prognosticimpactofajccresponsecriteriaforneoadjuvantchemotherapyinstageiiiiibreastcancerpatientsbreastcancersubtypeanalyses AT ohdoyoun prognosticimpactofajccresponsecriteriaforneoadjuvantchemotherapyinstageiiiiibreastcancerpatientsbreastcancersubtypeanalyses AT hanwonshik prognosticimpactofajccresponsecriteriaforneoadjuvantchemotherapyinstageiiiiibreastcancerpatientsbreastcancersubtypeanalyses AT kimtaeyou prognosticimpactofajccresponsecriteriaforneoadjuvantchemotherapyinstageiiiiibreastcancerpatientsbreastcancersubtypeanalyses AT parkinae prognosticimpactofajccresponsecriteriaforneoadjuvantchemotherapyinstageiiiiibreastcancerpatientsbreastcancersubtypeanalyses AT nohdongyoung prognosticimpactofajccresponsecriteriaforneoadjuvantchemotherapyinstageiiiiibreastcancerpatientsbreastcancersubtypeanalyses |