Cargando…

Better Working Memory and Motor Inhibition in Children Who Delayed Gratification

Background: Despite the extensive research on delayed gratification over the past few decades, the neurocognitive processes that subserve delayed gratification remains unclear. As an exploratory step in studying these processes, the present study aims to describe the executive function profiles of c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yu, Junhong, Kam, Chi-Ming, Lee, Tatia M. C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4955289/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27493638
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01098
_version_ 1782443924259864576
author Yu, Junhong
Kam, Chi-Ming
Lee, Tatia M. C.
author_facet Yu, Junhong
Kam, Chi-Ming
Lee, Tatia M. C.
author_sort Yu, Junhong
collection PubMed
description Background: Despite the extensive research on delayed gratification over the past few decades, the neurocognitive processes that subserve delayed gratification remains unclear. As an exploratory step in studying these processes, the present study aims to describe the executive function profiles of children who were successful at delaying gratification and those who were not. Methods: A total of 138 kindergarten students (65 males, 73 females; M(age) = 44 months, SD = 3.5; age range = 37–53 months) were administered a delayed gratification task, a 1-back test, a Day/night Stroop test and a Go/no-go test. The outcome measures of these tests were then analyzed between groups using a Multivariate Analysis of Variance, and subsequently a Multivariate Analysis of Covariance incorporating age as a covariate. Results: Children who were successful in delaying gratification were significantly older and had significantly better outcomes in the 1-back test and go/no-go test. With the exception of the number of hits in the go/no-go test, all other group differences remained significant after controlling for age. Conclusion: Children who were successful in delaying gratification showed better working memory and motor inhibition relative to those who failed the delayed gratification task. The implications of these findings are discussed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4955289
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49552892016-08-04 Better Working Memory and Motor Inhibition in Children Who Delayed Gratification Yu, Junhong Kam, Chi-Ming Lee, Tatia M. C. Front Psychol Psychology Background: Despite the extensive research on delayed gratification over the past few decades, the neurocognitive processes that subserve delayed gratification remains unclear. As an exploratory step in studying these processes, the present study aims to describe the executive function profiles of children who were successful at delaying gratification and those who were not. Methods: A total of 138 kindergarten students (65 males, 73 females; M(age) = 44 months, SD = 3.5; age range = 37–53 months) were administered a delayed gratification task, a 1-back test, a Day/night Stroop test and a Go/no-go test. The outcome measures of these tests were then analyzed between groups using a Multivariate Analysis of Variance, and subsequently a Multivariate Analysis of Covariance incorporating age as a covariate. Results: Children who were successful in delaying gratification were significantly older and had significantly better outcomes in the 1-back test and go/no-go test. With the exception of the number of hits in the go/no-go test, all other group differences remained significant after controlling for age. Conclusion: Children who were successful in delaying gratification showed better working memory and motor inhibition relative to those who failed the delayed gratification task. The implications of these findings are discussed. Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4955289/ /pubmed/27493638 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01098 Text en Copyright © 2016 Yu, Kam and Lee. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Yu, Junhong
Kam, Chi-Ming
Lee, Tatia M. C.
Better Working Memory and Motor Inhibition in Children Who Delayed Gratification
title Better Working Memory and Motor Inhibition in Children Who Delayed Gratification
title_full Better Working Memory and Motor Inhibition in Children Who Delayed Gratification
title_fullStr Better Working Memory and Motor Inhibition in Children Who Delayed Gratification
title_full_unstemmed Better Working Memory and Motor Inhibition in Children Who Delayed Gratification
title_short Better Working Memory and Motor Inhibition in Children Who Delayed Gratification
title_sort better working memory and motor inhibition in children who delayed gratification
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4955289/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27493638
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01098
work_keys_str_mv AT yujunhong betterworkingmemoryandmotorinhibitioninchildrenwhodelayedgratification
AT kamchiming betterworkingmemoryandmotorinhibitioninchildrenwhodelayedgratification
AT leetatiamc betterworkingmemoryandmotorinhibitioninchildrenwhodelayedgratification