Cargando…

Reversible small bowel obstruction in the chicken foetus

BACKGROUND: Ligation of the embryonic gut is an established technique to induce intestinal obstruction and subsequently intestinal atresia in chicken embryos. In this study, we modified this established chicken model of prenatal intestinal obstruction to describe (1) the kinetics of morphological ch...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: von Sochaczewski, Christina Oetzmann, Wenke, Katharina, Metzger, Roman Patrick, Loveland, Jerome Alexander, Westgarth-Taylor, Chris, Kluth, Dietrich
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4955491/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25659543
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0189-6725.150932
_version_ 1782443946633330688
author von Sochaczewski, Christina Oetzmann
Wenke, Katharina
Metzger, Roman Patrick
Loveland, Jerome Alexander
Westgarth-Taylor, Chris
Kluth, Dietrich
author_facet von Sochaczewski, Christina Oetzmann
Wenke, Katharina
Metzger, Roman Patrick
Loveland, Jerome Alexander
Westgarth-Taylor, Chris
Kluth, Dietrich
author_sort von Sochaczewski, Christina Oetzmann
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Ligation of the embryonic gut is an established technique to induce intestinal obstruction and subsequently intestinal atresia in chicken embryos. In this study, we modified this established chicken model of prenatal intestinal obstruction to describe (1) the kinetics of morphological changes, (2) to test if removal of the ligature in ovo is possible in later embryonic development and (3) to describe morphological adaptations following removal of the ligature. MATERIALS AND METHODS: On embryonic day (ED) 11, small intestines of chick embryos were ligated micro surgically in ovo. In Group 1 (n = 80) gut was harvested proximal and distal to the ligation on ED 12-19. In Group 2 (n = 20) the induced obstruction was released on day 15 and gut was harvested on ED 16-19. Acetyl choline esterase staining was used as to assess resulting morphological changes. RESULTS: A marked intestinal dilatation of the proximal segment can be seen 4 days after the operation (ED 15). The dilatation increased in severity until ED 19 and intestinal atresia could be observed after ED 16. In the dilated proximal segments, signs of disturbed enteric nervous system morphology were obvious. In contrast to this, release of the obstruction on ED 15 in Group 2 resulted in almost normal gut morphology at ED 19. CONCLUSION: Our model not only allows the description of morphological changes caused by an induced obstruction on ED 11 but also-more important - of morphological signs of adaptation following the release of the obstruction on ED 15.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4955491
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49554912016-09-01 Reversible small bowel obstruction in the chicken foetus von Sochaczewski, Christina Oetzmann Wenke, Katharina Metzger, Roman Patrick Loveland, Jerome Alexander Westgarth-Taylor, Chris Kluth, Dietrich Afr J Paediatr Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: Ligation of the embryonic gut is an established technique to induce intestinal obstruction and subsequently intestinal atresia in chicken embryos. In this study, we modified this established chicken model of prenatal intestinal obstruction to describe (1) the kinetics of morphological changes, (2) to test if removal of the ligature in ovo is possible in later embryonic development and (3) to describe morphological adaptations following removal of the ligature. MATERIALS AND METHODS: On embryonic day (ED) 11, small intestines of chick embryos were ligated micro surgically in ovo. In Group 1 (n = 80) gut was harvested proximal and distal to the ligation on ED 12-19. In Group 2 (n = 20) the induced obstruction was released on day 15 and gut was harvested on ED 16-19. Acetyl choline esterase staining was used as to assess resulting morphological changes. RESULTS: A marked intestinal dilatation of the proximal segment can be seen 4 days after the operation (ED 15). The dilatation increased in severity until ED 19 and intestinal atresia could be observed after ED 16. In the dilated proximal segments, signs of disturbed enteric nervous system morphology were obvious. In contrast to this, release of the obstruction on ED 15 in Group 2 resulted in almost normal gut morphology at ED 19. CONCLUSION: Our model not only allows the description of morphological changes caused by an induced obstruction on ED 11 but also-more important - of morphological signs of adaptation following the release of the obstruction on ED 15. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4955491/ /pubmed/25659543 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0189-6725.150932 Text en Copyright: © African Journal of Paediatric Surgery http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
von Sochaczewski, Christina Oetzmann
Wenke, Katharina
Metzger, Roman Patrick
Loveland, Jerome Alexander
Westgarth-Taylor, Chris
Kluth, Dietrich
Reversible small bowel obstruction in the chicken foetus
title Reversible small bowel obstruction in the chicken foetus
title_full Reversible small bowel obstruction in the chicken foetus
title_fullStr Reversible small bowel obstruction in the chicken foetus
title_full_unstemmed Reversible small bowel obstruction in the chicken foetus
title_short Reversible small bowel obstruction in the chicken foetus
title_sort reversible small bowel obstruction in the chicken foetus
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4955491/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25659543
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0189-6725.150932
work_keys_str_mv AT vonsochaczewskichristinaoetzmann reversiblesmallbowelobstructioninthechickenfoetus
AT wenkekatharina reversiblesmallbowelobstructioninthechickenfoetus
AT metzgerromanpatrick reversiblesmallbowelobstructioninthechickenfoetus
AT lovelandjeromealexander reversiblesmallbowelobstructioninthechickenfoetus
AT westgarthtaylorchris reversiblesmallbowelobstructioninthechickenfoetus
AT kluthdietrich reversiblesmallbowelobstructioninthechickenfoetus