When and how to update systematic reviews: consensus and checklist

Updating of systematic reviews is generally more efficient than starting all over again when new evidence emerges, but to date there has been no clear guidance on how to do this. This guidance helps authors of systematic reviews, commissioners, and editors decide when to update a systematic review,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Garner, Paul, Hopewell, Sally, Chandler, Jackie, MacLehose, Harriet, Schünemann, Holger J, Akl, Elie A, Beyene, Joseph, Chang, Stephanie, Churchill, Rachel, Dearness, Karin, Guyatt, Gordon, Lefebvre, Carol, Liles, Beth, Marshall, Rachel, Martínez García, Laura, Mavergames, Chris, Nasser, Mona, Qaseem, Amir, Sampson, Margaret, Soares-Weiser, Karla, Takwoingi, Yemisi, Thabane, Lehana, Trivella, Marialena, Tugwell, Peter, Welsh, Emma, Wilson, Ed C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. 2016
Materias:
Research Methods & Reporting
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4955793/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27443385
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i3507
Descripción
Sumario:Updating of systematic reviews is generally more efficient than starting all over again when new evidence emerges, but to date there has been no clear guidance on how to do this. This guidance helps authors of systematic reviews, commissioners, and editors decide when to update a systematic review, and then how to go about updating the review.

Ejemplares similares