Cargando…

The Reliability and Validity of Short Online Questionnaires to Measure Fruit and Vegetable Intake in Adults: The Fruit Test and Vegetable Test

The first aim of this study was to investigate the stability of the Fruit Test and Vegetable Test over time and whether the Fruit Test and Vegetable Test are capable of measuring fruit and vegetable intake with consistency. Second, the study aimed to examine criterion (concurrent) validity of the Fr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Plaete, Jolien, De Bourdeaudhuij, Ilse, Crombez, Geert, Steenhuyzen, Saidja, Dejaegere, Liesbet, Vanhauwaert, Erika, Verloigne, Maïté
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4956215/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27441632
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159834
_version_ 1782444000783892480
author Plaete, Jolien
De Bourdeaudhuij, Ilse
Crombez, Geert
Steenhuyzen, Saidja
Dejaegere, Liesbet
Vanhauwaert, Erika
Verloigne, Maïté
author_facet Plaete, Jolien
De Bourdeaudhuij, Ilse
Crombez, Geert
Steenhuyzen, Saidja
Dejaegere, Liesbet
Vanhauwaert, Erika
Verloigne, Maïté
author_sort Plaete, Jolien
collection PubMed
description The first aim of this study was to investigate the stability of the Fruit Test and Vegetable Test over time and whether the Fruit Test and Vegetable Test are capable of measuring fruit and vegetable intake with consistency. Second, the study aimed to examine criterion (concurrent) validity of the Fruit Test and Vegetable Test by testing their agreement with 7-day food diary-derived measures of fruit and vegetable intake. In total 58 adults (31% male, mean age = 30.0±12.09y) completed the Flemish Fruit and Vegetable test by indicating the frequency of days that they ate fruit and vegetables and the number of portions during the past week. Validity was tested by using a 7-day food diary as a golden standard. Adults were asked to register their fruit and vegetable intake daily in a diary during one week. Spearman correlations were measured to compare total intake reported in the Fruit and Vegetable Test and in the 7-day diary. Agreement plots were used to illustrate absolute agreement. Test-retest reliability was evaluated by having participants completing the Fruit Test and Vegetable Test twice. The Fruit Test (ICC = 0.81) and Vegetable Test (ICC = 0.78) showed excellent and substantial reliability. The Fruit Test (ρ = 0.73) and Vegetable Test showed good validity. Agreement plots showed modest variability in differences between vegetable and fruit intake as measured by the Vegetable and Fruit Test and the 7-day food diary. Also a small underestimation of fruit intake in the Fruit test and vegetable intake in the Vegetable test against the 7-day food diary was shown. Based on the results, it is suggested to include portion size pictures and consumption of mixed vegetables to prevent underestimation. To prevent overestimation, it is concluded to add a moderate number of representative fruit and vegetable items, questions on portion size, household sizes with sufficient detail and food items highly tailored to the dietary behaviors and local food items of the population surveyed. The questionnaires can easily be adapted for the use in other diets (e.g. Asian diet), but reliability and validity should then be examined again. Also, validity remains to be tested in other population groups (i.e. low socio economic status groups, other age groups).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4956215
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49562152016-08-08 The Reliability and Validity of Short Online Questionnaires to Measure Fruit and Vegetable Intake in Adults: The Fruit Test and Vegetable Test Plaete, Jolien De Bourdeaudhuij, Ilse Crombez, Geert Steenhuyzen, Saidja Dejaegere, Liesbet Vanhauwaert, Erika Verloigne, Maïté PLoS One Research Article The first aim of this study was to investigate the stability of the Fruit Test and Vegetable Test over time and whether the Fruit Test and Vegetable Test are capable of measuring fruit and vegetable intake with consistency. Second, the study aimed to examine criterion (concurrent) validity of the Fruit Test and Vegetable Test by testing their agreement with 7-day food diary-derived measures of fruit and vegetable intake. In total 58 adults (31% male, mean age = 30.0±12.09y) completed the Flemish Fruit and Vegetable test by indicating the frequency of days that they ate fruit and vegetables and the number of portions during the past week. Validity was tested by using a 7-day food diary as a golden standard. Adults were asked to register their fruit and vegetable intake daily in a diary during one week. Spearman correlations were measured to compare total intake reported in the Fruit and Vegetable Test and in the 7-day diary. Agreement plots were used to illustrate absolute agreement. Test-retest reliability was evaluated by having participants completing the Fruit Test and Vegetable Test twice. The Fruit Test (ICC = 0.81) and Vegetable Test (ICC = 0.78) showed excellent and substantial reliability. The Fruit Test (ρ = 0.73) and Vegetable Test showed good validity. Agreement plots showed modest variability in differences between vegetable and fruit intake as measured by the Vegetable and Fruit Test and the 7-day food diary. Also a small underestimation of fruit intake in the Fruit test and vegetable intake in the Vegetable test against the 7-day food diary was shown. Based on the results, it is suggested to include portion size pictures and consumption of mixed vegetables to prevent underestimation. To prevent overestimation, it is concluded to add a moderate number of representative fruit and vegetable items, questions on portion size, household sizes with sufficient detail and food items highly tailored to the dietary behaviors and local food items of the population surveyed. The questionnaires can easily be adapted for the use in other diets (e.g. Asian diet), but reliability and validity should then be examined again. Also, validity remains to be tested in other population groups (i.e. low socio economic status groups, other age groups). Public Library of Science 2016-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4956215/ /pubmed/27441632 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159834 Text en © 2016 Plaete et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Plaete, Jolien
De Bourdeaudhuij, Ilse
Crombez, Geert
Steenhuyzen, Saidja
Dejaegere, Liesbet
Vanhauwaert, Erika
Verloigne, Maïté
The Reliability and Validity of Short Online Questionnaires to Measure Fruit and Vegetable Intake in Adults: The Fruit Test and Vegetable Test
title The Reliability and Validity of Short Online Questionnaires to Measure Fruit and Vegetable Intake in Adults: The Fruit Test and Vegetable Test
title_full The Reliability and Validity of Short Online Questionnaires to Measure Fruit and Vegetable Intake in Adults: The Fruit Test and Vegetable Test
title_fullStr The Reliability and Validity of Short Online Questionnaires to Measure Fruit and Vegetable Intake in Adults: The Fruit Test and Vegetable Test
title_full_unstemmed The Reliability and Validity of Short Online Questionnaires to Measure Fruit and Vegetable Intake in Adults: The Fruit Test and Vegetable Test
title_short The Reliability and Validity of Short Online Questionnaires to Measure Fruit and Vegetable Intake in Adults: The Fruit Test and Vegetable Test
title_sort reliability and validity of short online questionnaires to measure fruit and vegetable intake in adults: the fruit test and vegetable test
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4956215/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27441632
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159834
work_keys_str_mv AT plaetejolien thereliabilityandvalidityofshortonlinequestionnairestomeasurefruitandvegetableintakeinadultsthefruittestandvegetabletest
AT debourdeaudhuijilse thereliabilityandvalidityofshortonlinequestionnairestomeasurefruitandvegetableintakeinadultsthefruittestandvegetabletest
AT crombezgeert thereliabilityandvalidityofshortonlinequestionnairestomeasurefruitandvegetableintakeinadultsthefruittestandvegetabletest
AT steenhuyzensaidja thereliabilityandvalidityofshortonlinequestionnairestomeasurefruitandvegetableintakeinadultsthefruittestandvegetabletest
AT dejaegereliesbet thereliabilityandvalidityofshortonlinequestionnairestomeasurefruitandvegetableintakeinadultsthefruittestandvegetabletest
AT vanhauwaerterika thereliabilityandvalidityofshortonlinequestionnairestomeasurefruitandvegetableintakeinadultsthefruittestandvegetabletest
AT verloignemaite thereliabilityandvalidityofshortonlinequestionnairestomeasurefruitandvegetableintakeinadultsthefruittestandvegetabletest
AT plaetejolien reliabilityandvalidityofshortonlinequestionnairestomeasurefruitandvegetableintakeinadultsthefruittestandvegetabletest
AT debourdeaudhuijilse reliabilityandvalidityofshortonlinequestionnairestomeasurefruitandvegetableintakeinadultsthefruittestandvegetabletest
AT crombezgeert reliabilityandvalidityofshortonlinequestionnairestomeasurefruitandvegetableintakeinadultsthefruittestandvegetabletest
AT steenhuyzensaidja reliabilityandvalidityofshortonlinequestionnairestomeasurefruitandvegetableintakeinadultsthefruittestandvegetabletest
AT dejaegereliesbet reliabilityandvalidityofshortonlinequestionnairestomeasurefruitandvegetableintakeinadultsthefruittestandvegetabletest
AT vanhauwaerterika reliabilityandvalidityofshortonlinequestionnairestomeasurefruitandvegetableintakeinadultsthefruittestandvegetabletest
AT verloignemaite reliabilityandvalidityofshortonlinequestionnairestomeasurefruitandvegetableintakeinadultsthefruittestandvegetabletest