Cargando…

TEP versus Lichtenstein: Which technique is better for the repair of primary unilateral inguinal hernias in men?

INTRODUCTION: In the update of the guidelines of the European Hernia Society, open Lichtenstein and endoscopic techniques continue to be recommended as the surgical technique of choice for repair of unilateral primary inguinal hernias in men despite the fact that a meta-analysis had identified a hig...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Köckerling, F., Stechemesser, B., Hukauf, M., Kuthe, A., Schug-Pass, C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4956717/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26490771
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4603-1
_version_ 1782444061656875008
author Köckerling, F.
Stechemesser, B.
Hukauf, M.
Kuthe, A.
Schug-Pass, C.
author_facet Köckerling, F.
Stechemesser, B.
Hukauf, M.
Kuthe, A.
Schug-Pass, C.
author_sort Köckerling, F.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: In the update of the guidelines of the European Hernia Society, open Lichtenstein and endoscopic techniques continue to be recommended as the surgical technique of choice for repair of unilateral primary inguinal hernias in men despite the fact that a meta-analysis had identified a higher recurrence rate for TEP compared with Lichtenstein operation. The Guidelines Group had taken that decision because one surgeon in one of the randomized controlled trials included in the meta-analysis had had a very high recurrence rate. Therefore, this study based on registry data now compares the outcome of TEP versus Lichtenstein repair. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The analysis of the Herniamed Registry compares the prospective data collected for male patients undergoing primary unilateral inguinal hernia repair using either TEP or open Lichtenstein repair. Inclusion criteria were minimum age of 16 years, male patient, primary unilateral inguinal hernia, elective operation, and availability of data on 1-year follow-up. In total, 17,388 patients were enrolled between September 1, 2009, and August 31, 2013. Of these patients, 10,555 (60.70 %) had a Lichtenstein repair and 6833 (39.30 %) a TEP repair. RESULTS: On multivariable analysis, the surgical technique was not found to have had any significant effect on the recurrence rate (p = 0.146) or on the chronic pain rate (p = 0.560). Nor did the complication-related reoperation rates differ significantly between the two techniques (p = 0.084). But TEP was found to have benefits as regards the postoperative complication rate (p < 0.001), pain at rest rate (p = 0.011), and pain on exertion rate (p < 0.001). SUMMARY: In the present registry study, no significant difference was identified in the recurrence rates between the TEP and Lichtenstein technique. TEP was found to have benefits compared with Lichtenstein repair as regards the postoperative complication rates, pain at rest, and pain on exertion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4956717
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49567172016-08-01 TEP versus Lichtenstein: Which technique is better for the repair of primary unilateral inguinal hernias in men? Köckerling, F. Stechemesser, B. Hukauf, M. Kuthe, A. Schug-Pass, C. Surg Endosc Article INTRODUCTION: In the update of the guidelines of the European Hernia Society, open Lichtenstein and endoscopic techniques continue to be recommended as the surgical technique of choice for repair of unilateral primary inguinal hernias in men despite the fact that a meta-analysis had identified a higher recurrence rate for TEP compared with Lichtenstein operation. The Guidelines Group had taken that decision because one surgeon in one of the randomized controlled trials included in the meta-analysis had had a very high recurrence rate. Therefore, this study based on registry data now compares the outcome of TEP versus Lichtenstein repair. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The analysis of the Herniamed Registry compares the prospective data collected for male patients undergoing primary unilateral inguinal hernia repair using either TEP or open Lichtenstein repair. Inclusion criteria were minimum age of 16 years, male patient, primary unilateral inguinal hernia, elective operation, and availability of data on 1-year follow-up. In total, 17,388 patients were enrolled between September 1, 2009, and August 31, 2013. Of these patients, 10,555 (60.70 %) had a Lichtenstein repair and 6833 (39.30 %) a TEP repair. RESULTS: On multivariable analysis, the surgical technique was not found to have had any significant effect on the recurrence rate (p = 0.146) or on the chronic pain rate (p = 0.560). Nor did the complication-related reoperation rates differ significantly between the two techniques (p = 0.084). But TEP was found to have benefits as regards the postoperative complication rate (p < 0.001), pain at rest rate (p = 0.011), and pain on exertion rate (p < 0.001). SUMMARY: In the present registry study, no significant difference was identified in the recurrence rates between the TEP and Lichtenstein technique. TEP was found to have benefits compared with Lichtenstein repair as regards the postoperative complication rates, pain at rest, and pain on exertion. Springer US 2015-10-21 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4956717/ /pubmed/26490771 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4603-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Article
Köckerling, F.
Stechemesser, B.
Hukauf, M.
Kuthe, A.
Schug-Pass, C.
TEP versus Lichtenstein: Which technique is better for the repair of primary unilateral inguinal hernias in men?
title TEP versus Lichtenstein: Which technique is better for the repair of primary unilateral inguinal hernias in men?
title_full TEP versus Lichtenstein: Which technique is better for the repair of primary unilateral inguinal hernias in men?
title_fullStr TEP versus Lichtenstein: Which technique is better for the repair of primary unilateral inguinal hernias in men?
title_full_unstemmed TEP versus Lichtenstein: Which technique is better for the repair of primary unilateral inguinal hernias in men?
title_short TEP versus Lichtenstein: Which technique is better for the repair of primary unilateral inguinal hernias in men?
title_sort tep versus lichtenstein: which technique is better for the repair of primary unilateral inguinal hernias in men?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4956717/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26490771
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4603-1
work_keys_str_mv AT kockerlingf tepversuslichtensteinwhichtechniqueisbetterfortherepairofprimaryunilateralinguinalherniasinmen
AT stechemesserb tepversuslichtensteinwhichtechniqueisbetterfortherepairofprimaryunilateralinguinalherniasinmen
AT hukaufm tepversuslichtensteinwhichtechniqueisbetterfortherepairofprimaryunilateralinguinalherniasinmen
AT kuthea tepversuslichtensteinwhichtechniqueisbetterfortherepairofprimaryunilateralinguinalherniasinmen
AT schugpassc tepversuslichtensteinwhichtechniqueisbetterfortherepairofprimaryunilateralinguinalherniasinmen