Cargando…

Proximate drivers of spatial segregation in non-breeding albatrosses

Many animals partition resources to avoid competition, and in colonially-breeding species this often leads to divergent space or habitat use. During the non-breeding season, foraging constraints are relaxed, yet the patterns and drivers of segregation both between and within populations are poorly u...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Clay, Thomas A., Manica, Andrea, Ryan, Peter G., Silk, Janet R. D., Croxall, John P., Ireland, Louise, Phillips, Richard A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4956756/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27443877
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep29932
_version_ 1782444070195429376
author Clay, Thomas A.
Manica, Andrea
Ryan, Peter G.
Silk, Janet R. D.
Croxall, John P.
Ireland, Louise
Phillips, Richard A.
author_facet Clay, Thomas A.
Manica, Andrea
Ryan, Peter G.
Silk, Janet R. D.
Croxall, John P.
Ireland, Louise
Phillips, Richard A.
author_sort Clay, Thomas A.
collection PubMed
description Many animals partition resources to avoid competition, and in colonially-breeding species this often leads to divergent space or habitat use. During the non-breeding season, foraging constraints are relaxed, yet the patterns and drivers of segregation both between and within populations are poorly understood. We modelled habitat preference to examine how extrinsic (habitat availability and intra-specific competition) and intrinsic factors (population, sex and breeding outcome) influence the distributions of non-breeding grey-headed albatrosses Thalassarche chrysostoma tracked from two major populations, South Georgia (Atlantic Ocean) and the Prince Edward Islands (Indian Ocean). Spatial segregation was greater than expected, reflecting distinct seasonal differences in habitat selection and accessibility, and avoidance of intra-specific competition with local breeders. Previously failed birds segregated spatially from successful birds during summer, when they used less productive waters, suggesting a link between breeding outcome and subsequent habitat selection. In contrast, we found weak evidence of sexual segregation, which did not reflect a difference in habitat use. Our results indicate that the large-scale spatial structuring of albatross distributions results from interactions between extrinsic and intrinsic factors, with important implications for population dynamics. As habitat preferences differed substantially between colonies, populations should be considered independently when identifying critical areas for protection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4956756
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49567562016-07-26 Proximate drivers of spatial segregation in non-breeding albatrosses Clay, Thomas A. Manica, Andrea Ryan, Peter G. Silk, Janet R. D. Croxall, John P. Ireland, Louise Phillips, Richard A. Sci Rep Article Many animals partition resources to avoid competition, and in colonially-breeding species this often leads to divergent space or habitat use. During the non-breeding season, foraging constraints are relaxed, yet the patterns and drivers of segregation both between and within populations are poorly understood. We modelled habitat preference to examine how extrinsic (habitat availability and intra-specific competition) and intrinsic factors (population, sex and breeding outcome) influence the distributions of non-breeding grey-headed albatrosses Thalassarche chrysostoma tracked from two major populations, South Georgia (Atlantic Ocean) and the Prince Edward Islands (Indian Ocean). Spatial segregation was greater than expected, reflecting distinct seasonal differences in habitat selection and accessibility, and avoidance of intra-specific competition with local breeders. Previously failed birds segregated spatially from successful birds during summer, when they used less productive waters, suggesting a link between breeding outcome and subsequent habitat selection. In contrast, we found weak evidence of sexual segregation, which did not reflect a difference in habitat use. Our results indicate that the large-scale spatial structuring of albatross distributions results from interactions between extrinsic and intrinsic factors, with important implications for population dynamics. As habitat preferences differed substantially between colonies, populations should be considered independently when identifying critical areas for protection. Nature Publishing Group 2016-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4956756/ /pubmed/27443877 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep29932 Text en Copyright © 2016, Macmillan Publishers Limited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Clay, Thomas A.
Manica, Andrea
Ryan, Peter G.
Silk, Janet R. D.
Croxall, John P.
Ireland, Louise
Phillips, Richard A.
Proximate drivers of spatial segregation in non-breeding albatrosses
title Proximate drivers of spatial segregation in non-breeding albatrosses
title_full Proximate drivers of spatial segregation in non-breeding albatrosses
title_fullStr Proximate drivers of spatial segregation in non-breeding albatrosses
title_full_unstemmed Proximate drivers of spatial segregation in non-breeding albatrosses
title_short Proximate drivers of spatial segregation in non-breeding albatrosses
title_sort proximate drivers of spatial segregation in non-breeding albatrosses
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4956756/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27443877
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep29932
work_keys_str_mv AT claythomasa proximatedriversofspatialsegregationinnonbreedingalbatrosses
AT manicaandrea proximatedriversofspatialsegregationinnonbreedingalbatrosses
AT ryanpeterg proximatedriversofspatialsegregationinnonbreedingalbatrosses
AT silkjanetrd proximatedriversofspatialsegregationinnonbreedingalbatrosses
AT croxalljohnp proximatedriversofspatialsegregationinnonbreedingalbatrosses
AT irelandlouise proximatedriversofspatialsegregationinnonbreedingalbatrosses
AT phillipsricharda proximatedriversofspatialsegregationinnonbreedingalbatrosses