Cargando…

Quantitative Comparison of Photothermal Heat Generation between Gold Nanospheres and Nanorods

Gold nanoparticles (GNPs) are widely used for biomedical applications due to unique optical properties, established synthesis methods, and biological compatibility. Despite important applications of plasmonic heating in thermal therapy, imaging, and diagnostics, the lack of quantification in heat ge...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Qin, Zhenpeng, Wang, Yiru, Randrianalisoa, Jaona, Raeesi, Vahid, Chan, Warren C. W., Lipiński, Wojciech, Bischof, John C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4956767/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27445172
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep29836
_version_ 1782444072645951488
author Qin, Zhenpeng
Wang, Yiru
Randrianalisoa, Jaona
Raeesi, Vahid
Chan, Warren C. W.
Lipiński, Wojciech
Bischof, John C.
author_facet Qin, Zhenpeng
Wang, Yiru
Randrianalisoa, Jaona
Raeesi, Vahid
Chan, Warren C. W.
Lipiński, Wojciech
Bischof, John C.
author_sort Qin, Zhenpeng
collection PubMed
description Gold nanoparticles (GNPs) are widely used for biomedical applications due to unique optical properties, established synthesis methods, and biological compatibility. Despite important applications of plasmonic heating in thermal therapy, imaging, and diagnostics, the lack of quantification in heat generation leads to difficulties in comparing the heating capability for new plasmonic nanostructures and predicting the therapeutic and diagnostic outcome. This study quantifies GNP heat generation by experimental measurements and theoretical predictions for gold nanospheres (GNS) and nanorods (GNR). Interestingly, the results show a GNP-type dependent agreement between experiment and theory. The measured heat generation of GNS matches well with theory, while the measured heat generation of GNR is only 30% of that predicted theoretically at peak absorption. This then leads to a surprising finding that the polydispersity, the deviation of nanoparticle size and shape from nominal value, significantly influences GNR heat generation (>70% reduction), while having a limited effect for GNS (<10% change). This work demonstrates that polydispersity is an important metric in quantitatively predicting plasmonic heat generation and provides a validated framework to quantitatively compare the heating capabilities between gold and other plasmonic nanostructures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4956767
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49567672016-07-26 Quantitative Comparison of Photothermal Heat Generation between Gold Nanospheres and Nanorods Qin, Zhenpeng Wang, Yiru Randrianalisoa, Jaona Raeesi, Vahid Chan, Warren C. W. Lipiński, Wojciech Bischof, John C. Sci Rep Article Gold nanoparticles (GNPs) are widely used for biomedical applications due to unique optical properties, established synthesis methods, and biological compatibility. Despite important applications of plasmonic heating in thermal therapy, imaging, and diagnostics, the lack of quantification in heat generation leads to difficulties in comparing the heating capability for new plasmonic nanostructures and predicting the therapeutic and diagnostic outcome. This study quantifies GNP heat generation by experimental measurements and theoretical predictions for gold nanospheres (GNS) and nanorods (GNR). Interestingly, the results show a GNP-type dependent agreement between experiment and theory. The measured heat generation of GNS matches well with theory, while the measured heat generation of GNR is only 30% of that predicted theoretically at peak absorption. This then leads to a surprising finding that the polydispersity, the deviation of nanoparticle size and shape from nominal value, significantly influences GNR heat generation (>70% reduction), while having a limited effect for GNS (<10% change). This work demonstrates that polydispersity is an important metric in quantitatively predicting plasmonic heat generation and provides a validated framework to quantitatively compare the heating capabilities between gold and other plasmonic nanostructures. Nature Publishing Group 2016-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4956767/ /pubmed/27445172 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep29836 Text en Copyright © 2016, Macmillan Publishers Limited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Qin, Zhenpeng
Wang, Yiru
Randrianalisoa, Jaona
Raeesi, Vahid
Chan, Warren C. W.
Lipiński, Wojciech
Bischof, John C.
Quantitative Comparison of Photothermal Heat Generation between Gold Nanospheres and Nanorods
title Quantitative Comparison of Photothermal Heat Generation between Gold Nanospheres and Nanorods
title_full Quantitative Comparison of Photothermal Heat Generation between Gold Nanospheres and Nanorods
title_fullStr Quantitative Comparison of Photothermal Heat Generation between Gold Nanospheres and Nanorods
title_full_unstemmed Quantitative Comparison of Photothermal Heat Generation between Gold Nanospheres and Nanorods
title_short Quantitative Comparison of Photothermal Heat Generation between Gold Nanospheres and Nanorods
title_sort quantitative comparison of photothermal heat generation between gold nanospheres and nanorods
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4956767/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27445172
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep29836
work_keys_str_mv AT qinzhenpeng quantitativecomparisonofphotothermalheatgenerationbetweengoldnanospheresandnanorods
AT wangyiru quantitativecomparisonofphotothermalheatgenerationbetweengoldnanospheresandnanorods
AT randrianalisoajaona quantitativecomparisonofphotothermalheatgenerationbetweengoldnanospheresandnanorods
AT raeesivahid quantitativecomparisonofphotothermalheatgenerationbetweengoldnanospheresandnanorods
AT chanwarrencw quantitativecomparisonofphotothermalheatgenerationbetweengoldnanospheresandnanorods
AT lipinskiwojciech quantitativecomparisonofphotothermalheatgenerationbetweengoldnanospheresandnanorods
AT bischofjohnc quantitativecomparisonofphotothermalheatgenerationbetweengoldnanospheresandnanorods