Cargando…
Quantitative Comparison of Photothermal Heat Generation between Gold Nanospheres and Nanorods
Gold nanoparticles (GNPs) are widely used for biomedical applications due to unique optical properties, established synthesis methods, and biological compatibility. Despite important applications of plasmonic heating in thermal therapy, imaging, and diagnostics, the lack of quantification in heat ge...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4956767/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27445172 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep29836 |
_version_ | 1782444072645951488 |
---|---|
author | Qin, Zhenpeng Wang, Yiru Randrianalisoa, Jaona Raeesi, Vahid Chan, Warren C. W. Lipiński, Wojciech Bischof, John C. |
author_facet | Qin, Zhenpeng Wang, Yiru Randrianalisoa, Jaona Raeesi, Vahid Chan, Warren C. W. Lipiński, Wojciech Bischof, John C. |
author_sort | Qin, Zhenpeng |
collection | PubMed |
description | Gold nanoparticles (GNPs) are widely used for biomedical applications due to unique optical properties, established synthesis methods, and biological compatibility. Despite important applications of plasmonic heating in thermal therapy, imaging, and diagnostics, the lack of quantification in heat generation leads to difficulties in comparing the heating capability for new plasmonic nanostructures and predicting the therapeutic and diagnostic outcome. This study quantifies GNP heat generation by experimental measurements and theoretical predictions for gold nanospheres (GNS) and nanorods (GNR). Interestingly, the results show a GNP-type dependent agreement between experiment and theory. The measured heat generation of GNS matches well with theory, while the measured heat generation of GNR is only 30% of that predicted theoretically at peak absorption. This then leads to a surprising finding that the polydispersity, the deviation of nanoparticle size and shape from nominal value, significantly influences GNR heat generation (>70% reduction), while having a limited effect for GNS (<10% change). This work demonstrates that polydispersity is an important metric in quantitatively predicting plasmonic heat generation and provides a validated framework to quantitatively compare the heating capabilities between gold and other plasmonic nanostructures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4956767 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49567672016-07-26 Quantitative Comparison of Photothermal Heat Generation between Gold Nanospheres and Nanorods Qin, Zhenpeng Wang, Yiru Randrianalisoa, Jaona Raeesi, Vahid Chan, Warren C. W. Lipiński, Wojciech Bischof, John C. Sci Rep Article Gold nanoparticles (GNPs) are widely used for biomedical applications due to unique optical properties, established synthesis methods, and biological compatibility. Despite important applications of plasmonic heating in thermal therapy, imaging, and diagnostics, the lack of quantification in heat generation leads to difficulties in comparing the heating capability for new plasmonic nanostructures and predicting the therapeutic and diagnostic outcome. This study quantifies GNP heat generation by experimental measurements and theoretical predictions for gold nanospheres (GNS) and nanorods (GNR). Interestingly, the results show a GNP-type dependent agreement between experiment and theory. The measured heat generation of GNS matches well with theory, while the measured heat generation of GNR is only 30% of that predicted theoretically at peak absorption. This then leads to a surprising finding that the polydispersity, the deviation of nanoparticle size and shape from nominal value, significantly influences GNR heat generation (>70% reduction), while having a limited effect for GNS (<10% change). This work demonstrates that polydispersity is an important metric in quantitatively predicting plasmonic heat generation and provides a validated framework to quantitatively compare the heating capabilities between gold and other plasmonic nanostructures. Nature Publishing Group 2016-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4956767/ /pubmed/27445172 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep29836 Text en Copyright © 2016, Macmillan Publishers Limited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Article Qin, Zhenpeng Wang, Yiru Randrianalisoa, Jaona Raeesi, Vahid Chan, Warren C. W. Lipiński, Wojciech Bischof, John C. Quantitative Comparison of Photothermal Heat Generation between Gold Nanospheres and Nanorods |
title | Quantitative Comparison of Photothermal Heat Generation between Gold Nanospheres and Nanorods |
title_full | Quantitative Comparison of Photothermal Heat Generation between Gold Nanospheres and Nanorods |
title_fullStr | Quantitative Comparison of Photothermal Heat Generation between Gold Nanospheres and Nanorods |
title_full_unstemmed | Quantitative Comparison of Photothermal Heat Generation between Gold Nanospheres and Nanorods |
title_short | Quantitative Comparison of Photothermal Heat Generation between Gold Nanospheres and Nanorods |
title_sort | quantitative comparison of photothermal heat generation between gold nanospheres and nanorods |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4956767/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27445172 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep29836 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT qinzhenpeng quantitativecomparisonofphotothermalheatgenerationbetweengoldnanospheresandnanorods AT wangyiru quantitativecomparisonofphotothermalheatgenerationbetweengoldnanospheresandnanorods AT randrianalisoajaona quantitativecomparisonofphotothermalheatgenerationbetweengoldnanospheresandnanorods AT raeesivahid quantitativecomparisonofphotothermalheatgenerationbetweengoldnanospheresandnanorods AT chanwarrencw quantitativecomparisonofphotothermalheatgenerationbetweengoldnanospheresandnanorods AT lipinskiwojciech quantitativecomparisonofphotothermalheatgenerationbetweengoldnanospheresandnanorods AT bischofjohnc quantitativecomparisonofphotothermalheatgenerationbetweengoldnanospheresandnanorods |