Cargando…
Should viral load thresholds be lowered?: Revisiting the WHO definition for virologic failure in patients on antiretroviral therapy in resource-limited settings
The World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines on antiretroviral therapy (ART) define treatment failure as 2 consecutive viral loads (VLs) ≥1000 copies/mL. There is, however, little evidence supporting 1000 copies as an optimal threshold to define treatment failure. Objective of this study was to as...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4956783/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27428189 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000003985 |
_version_ | 1782444076115689472 |
---|---|
author | Labhardt, Niklaus D. Bader, Joëlle Lejone, Thabo Ishmael Ringera, Isaac Hobbins, Michael A. Fritz, Christiane Ehmer, Jochen Cerutti, Bernard Puga, Daniel Klimkait, Thomas |
author_facet | Labhardt, Niklaus D. Bader, Joëlle Lejone, Thabo Ishmael Ringera, Isaac Hobbins, Michael A. Fritz, Christiane Ehmer, Jochen Cerutti, Bernard Puga, Daniel Klimkait, Thomas |
author_sort | Labhardt, Niklaus D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines on antiretroviral therapy (ART) define treatment failure as 2 consecutive viral loads (VLs) ≥1000 copies/mL. There is, however, little evidence supporting 1000 copies as an optimal threshold to define treatment failure. Objective of this study was to assess the correlation of the WHO definition with the presence of drug-resistance mutations in patients who present with 2 consecutive unsuppressed VL in a resource-limited setting. In 10 nurse-led clinics in rural Lesotho children and adults on first-line ART for ≥6 months received a first routine VL. Those with plasma VL ≥80 copies/mL were enrolled in a prospective study, receiving enhanced adherence counseling (EAC) and a follow-up VL after 3 months. After a second unsuppressed VL genotypic resistance testing was performed. Viruses with major mutations against ≥2 drugs of the current regimen were classified as “resistant”. A total of 1563 adults and 191 children received a first routine VL. Of the 138 adults and 53 children with unsuppressed VL (≥80 copies/mL), 165 (116 adults; 49 children) had a follow-up VL after EAC; 108 (74 adults; 34 children) remained unsuppressed and resistance testing was successful. Ninety of them fulfilled the WHO definition of treatment failure (both VL ≥1000 copies/mL); for another 18 both VL were unsuppressed but with <1000 copies/mL. The positive predictive value (PPV) for the WHO failure definition was 81.1% (73/90) for the presence of resistant virus. Among the 18 with VL levels between 80 and 1000 copies/mL, thereby classified as “non-failures”, 17 (94.4%) harbored resistant viruses. Lowering the VL threshold from 1000 copies/mL to 80 copies/mL at both determinations had no negative influence on the PPV (83.3%; 90/108). The current WHO-definition misclassifies patients who harbor resistant virus at VL below 1000 c/mL as “nonfailing.” Lowering the threshold to VL ≥80 copies/mL identifies a significantly higher number of patients with treatment-resistant virus and should be considered. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4956783 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49567832016-08-02 Should viral load thresholds be lowered?: Revisiting the WHO definition for virologic failure in patients on antiretroviral therapy in resource-limited settings Labhardt, Niklaus D. Bader, Joëlle Lejone, Thabo Ishmael Ringera, Isaac Hobbins, Michael A. Fritz, Christiane Ehmer, Jochen Cerutti, Bernard Puga, Daniel Klimkait, Thomas Medicine (Baltimore) 4850 The World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines on antiretroviral therapy (ART) define treatment failure as 2 consecutive viral loads (VLs) ≥1000 copies/mL. There is, however, little evidence supporting 1000 copies as an optimal threshold to define treatment failure. Objective of this study was to assess the correlation of the WHO definition with the presence of drug-resistance mutations in patients who present with 2 consecutive unsuppressed VL in a resource-limited setting. In 10 nurse-led clinics in rural Lesotho children and adults on first-line ART for ≥6 months received a first routine VL. Those with plasma VL ≥80 copies/mL were enrolled in a prospective study, receiving enhanced adherence counseling (EAC) and a follow-up VL after 3 months. After a second unsuppressed VL genotypic resistance testing was performed. Viruses with major mutations against ≥2 drugs of the current regimen were classified as “resistant”. A total of 1563 adults and 191 children received a first routine VL. Of the 138 adults and 53 children with unsuppressed VL (≥80 copies/mL), 165 (116 adults; 49 children) had a follow-up VL after EAC; 108 (74 adults; 34 children) remained unsuppressed and resistance testing was successful. Ninety of them fulfilled the WHO definition of treatment failure (both VL ≥1000 copies/mL); for another 18 both VL were unsuppressed but with <1000 copies/mL. The positive predictive value (PPV) for the WHO failure definition was 81.1% (73/90) for the presence of resistant virus. Among the 18 with VL levels between 80 and 1000 copies/mL, thereby classified as “non-failures”, 17 (94.4%) harbored resistant viruses. Lowering the VL threshold from 1000 copies/mL to 80 copies/mL at both determinations had no negative influence on the PPV (83.3%; 90/108). The current WHO-definition misclassifies patients who harbor resistant virus at VL below 1000 c/mL as “nonfailing.” Lowering the threshold to VL ≥80 copies/mL identifies a significantly higher number of patients with treatment-resistant virus and should be considered. Wolters Kluwer Health 2016-07-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4956783/ /pubmed/27428189 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000003985 Text en Copyright © 2016 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0, where it is permissible to download, share and reproduce the work in any medium, provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
spellingShingle | 4850 Labhardt, Niklaus D. Bader, Joëlle Lejone, Thabo Ishmael Ringera, Isaac Hobbins, Michael A. Fritz, Christiane Ehmer, Jochen Cerutti, Bernard Puga, Daniel Klimkait, Thomas Should viral load thresholds be lowered?: Revisiting the WHO definition for virologic failure in patients on antiretroviral therapy in resource-limited settings |
title | Should viral load thresholds be lowered?: Revisiting the WHO definition for virologic failure in patients on antiretroviral therapy in resource-limited settings |
title_full | Should viral load thresholds be lowered?: Revisiting the WHO definition for virologic failure in patients on antiretroviral therapy in resource-limited settings |
title_fullStr | Should viral load thresholds be lowered?: Revisiting the WHO definition for virologic failure in patients on antiretroviral therapy in resource-limited settings |
title_full_unstemmed | Should viral load thresholds be lowered?: Revisiting the WHO definition for virologic failure in patients on antiretroviral therapy in resource-limited settings |
title_short | Should viral load thresholds be lowered?: Revisiting the WHO definition for virologic failure in patients on antiretroviral therapy in resource-limited settings |
title_sort | should viral load thresholds be lowered?: revisiting the who definition for virologic failure in patients on antiretroviral therapy in resource-limited settings |
topic | 4850 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4956783/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27428189 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000003985 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT labhardtniklausd shouldviralloadthresholdsbeloweredrevisitingthewhodefinitionforvirologicfailureinpatientsonantiretroviraltherapyinresourcelimitedsettings AT baderjoelle shouldviralloadthresholdsbeloweredrevisitingthewhodefinitionforvirologicfailureinpatientsonantiretroviraltherapyinresourcelimitedsettings AT lejonethaboishmael shouldviralloadthresholdsbeloweredrevisitingthewhodefinitionforvirologicfailureinpatientsonantiretroviraltherapyinresourcelimitedsettings AT ringeraisaac shouldviralloadthresholdsbeloweredrevisitingthewhodefinitionforvirologicfailureinpatientsonantiretroviraltherapyinresourcelimitedsettings AT hobbinsmichaela shouldviralloadthresholdsbeloweredrevisitingthewhodefinitionforvirologicfailureinpatientsonantiretroviraltherapyinresourcelimitedsettings AT fritzchristiane shouldviralloadthresholdsbeloweredrevisitingthewhodefinitionforvirologicfailureinpatientsonantiretroviraltherapyinresourcelimitedsettings AT ehmerjochen shouldviralloadthresholdsbeloweredrevisitingthewhodefinitionforvirologicfailureinpatientsonantiretroviraltherapyinresourcelimitedsettings AT ceruttibernard shouldviralloadthresholdsbeloweredrevisitingthewhodefinitionforvirologicfailureinpatientsonantiretroviraltherapyinresourcelimitedsettings AT pugadaniel shouldviralloadthresholdsbeloweredrevisitingthewhodefinitionforvirologicfailureinpatientsonantiretroviraltherapyinresourcelimitedsettings AT klimkaitthomas shouldviralloadthresholdsbeloweredrevisitingthewhodefinitionforvirologicfailureinpatientsonantiretroviraltherapyinresourcelimitedsettings |