Cargando…

Should viral load thresholds be lowered?: Revisiting the WHO definition for virologic failure in patients on antiretroviral therapy in resource-limited settings

The World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines on antiretroviral therapy (ART) define treatment failure as 2 consecutive viral loads (VLs) ≥1000 copies/mL. There is, however, little evidence supporting 1000 copies as an optimal threshold to define treatment failure. Objective of this study was to as...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Labhardt, Niklaus D., Bader, Joëlle, Lejone, Thabo Ishmael, Ringera, Isaac, Hobbins, Michael A., Fritz, Christiane, Ehmer, Jochen, Cerutti, Bernard, Puga, Daniel, Klimkait, Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4956783/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27428189
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000003985
_version_ 1782444076115689472
author Labhardt, Niklaus D.
Bader, Joëlle
Lejone, Thabo Ishmael
Ringera, Isaac
Hobbins, Michael A.
Fritz, Christiane
Ehmer, Jochen
Cerutti, Bernard
Puga, Daniel
Klimkait, Thomas
author_facet Labhardt, Niklaus D.
Bader, Joëlle
Lejone, Thabo Ishmael
Ringera, Isaac
Hobbins, Michael A.
Fritz, Christiane
Ehmer, Jochen
Cerutti, Bernard
Puga, Daniel
Klimkait, Thomas
author_sort Labhardt, Niklaus D.
collection PubMed
description The World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines on antiretroviral therapy (ART) define treatment failure as 2 consecutive viral loads (VLs) ≥1000 copies/mL. There is, however, little evidence supporting 1000 copies as an optimal threshold to define treatment failure. Objective of this study was to assess the correlation of the WHO definition with the presence of drug-resistance mutations in patients who present with 2 consecutive unsuppressed VL in a resource-limited setting. In 10 nurse-led clinics in rural Lesotho children and adults on first-line ART for ≥6 months received a first routine VL. Those with plasma VL ≥80 copies/mL were enrolled in a prospective study, receiving enhanced adherence counseling (EAC) and a follow-up VL after 3 months. After a second unsuppressed VL genotypic resistance testing was performed. Viruses with major mutations against ≥2 drugs of the current regimen were classified as “resistant”. A total of 1563 adults and 191 children received a first routine VL. Of the 138 adults and 53 children with unsuppressed VL (≥80 copies/mL), 165 (116 adults; 49 children) had a follow-up VL after EAC; 108 (74 adults; 34 children) remained unsuppressed and resistance testing was successful. Ninety of them fulfilled the WHO definition of treatment failure (both VL ≥1000 copies/mL); for another 18 both VL were unsuppressed but with <1000 copies/mL. The positive predictive value (PPV) for the WHO failure definition was 81.1% (73/90) for the presence of resistant virus. Among the 18 with VL levels between 80 and 1000 copies/mL, thereby classified as “non-failures”, 17 (94.4%) harbored resistant viruses. Lowering the VL threshold from 1000 copies/mL to 80 copies/mL at both determinations had no negative influence on the PPV (83.3%; 90/108). The current WHO-definition misclassifies patients who harbor resistant virus at VL below 1000 c/mL as “nonfailing.” Lowering the threshold to VL ≥80 copies/mL identifies a significantly higher number of patients with treatment-resistant virus and should be considered.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4956783
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49567832016-08-02 Should viral load thresholds be lowered?: Revisiting the WHO definition for virologic failure in patients on antiretroviral therapy in resource-limited settings Labhardt, Niklaus D. Bader, Joëlle Lejone, Thabo Ishmael Ringera, Isaac Hobbins, Michael A. Fritz, Christiane Ehmer, Jochen Cerutti, Bernard Puga, Daniel Klimkait, Thomas Medicine (Baltimore) 4850 The World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines on antiretroviral therapy (ART) define treatment failure as 2 consecutive viral loads (VLs) ≥1000 copies/mL. There is, however, little evidence supporting 1000 copies as an optimal threshold to define treatment failure. Objective of this study was to assess the correlation of the WHO definition with the presence of drug-resistance mutations in patients who present with 2 consecutive unsuppressed VL in a resource-limited setting. In 10 nurse-led clinics in rural Lesotho children and adults on first-line ART for ≥6 months received a first routine VL. Those with plasma VL ≥80 copies/mL were enrolled in a prospective study, receiving enhanced adherence counseling (EAC) and a follow-up VL after 3 months. After a second unsuppressed VL genotypic resistance testing was performed. Viruses with major mutations against ≥2 drugs of the current regimen were classified as “resistant”. A total of 1563 adults and 191 children received a first routine VL. Of the 138 adults and 53 children with unsuppressed VL (≥80 copies/mL), 165 (116 adults; 49 children) had a follow-up VL after EAC; 108 (74 adults; 34 children) remained unsuppressed and resistance testing was successful. Ninety of them fulfilled the WHO definition of treatment failure (both VL ≥1000 copies/mL); for another 18 both VL were unsuppressed but with <1000 copies/mL. The positive predictive value (PPV) for the WHO failure definition was 81.1% (73/90) for the presence of resistant virus. Among the 18 with VL levels between 80 and 1000 copies/mL, thereby classified as “non-failures”, 17 (94.4%) harbored resistant viruses. Lowering the VL threshold from 1000 copies/mL to 80 copies/mL at both determinations had no negative influence on the PPV (83.3%; 90/108). The current WHO-definition misclassifies patients who harbor resistant virus at VL below 1000 c/mL as “nonfailing.” Lowering the threshold to VL ≥80 copies/mL identifies a significantly higher number of patients with treatment-resistant virus and should be considered. Wolters Kluwer Health 2016-07-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4956783/ /pubmed/27428189 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000003985 Text en Copyright © 2016 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0, where it is permissible to download, share and reproduce the work in any medium, provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
spellingShingle 4850
Labhardt, Niklaus D.
Bader, Joëlle
Lejone, Thabo Ishmael
Ringera, Isaac
Hobbins, Michael A.
Fritz, Christiane
Ehmer, Jochen
Cerutti, Bernard
Puga, Daniel
Klimkait, Thomas
Should viral load thresholds be lowered?: Revisiting the WHO definition for virologic failure in patients on antiretroviral therapy in resource-limited settings
title Should viral load thresholds be lowered?: Revisiting the WHO definition for virologic failure in patients on antiretroviral therapy in resource-limited settings
title_full Should viral load thresholds be lowered?: Revisiting the WHO definition for virologic failure in patients on antiretroviral therapy in resource-limited settings
title_fullStr Should viral load thresholds be lowered?: Revisiting the WHO definition for virologic failure in patients on antiretroviral therapy in resource-limited settings
title_full_unstemmed Should viral load thresholds be lowered?: Revisiting the WHO definition for virologic failure in patients on antiretroviral therapy in resource-limited settings
title_short Should viral load thresholds be lowered?: Revisiting the WHO definition for virologic failure in patients on antiretroviral therapy in resource-limited settings
title_sort should viral load thresholds be lowered?: revisiting the who definition for virologic failure in patients on antiretroviral therapy in resource-limited settings
topic 4850
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4956783/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27428189
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000003985
work_keys_str_mv AT labhardtniklausd shouldviralloadthresholdsbeloweredrevisitingthewhodefinitionforvirologicfailureinpatientsonantiretroviraltherapyinresourcelimitedsettings
AT baderjoelle shouldviralloadthresholdsbeloweredrevisitingthewhodefinitionforvirologicfailureinpatientsonantiretroviraltherapyinresourcelimitedsettings
AT lejonethaboishmael shouldviralloadthresholdsbeloweredrevisitingthewhodefinitionforvirologicfailureinpatientsonantiretroviraltherapyinresourcelimitedsettings
AT ringeraisaac shouldviralloadthresholdsbeloweredrevisitingthewhodefinitionforvirologicfailureinpatientsonantiretroviraltherapyinresourcelimitedsettings
AT hobbinsmichaela shouldviralloadthresholdsbeloweredrevisitingthewhodefinitionforvirologicfailureinpatientsonantiretroviraltherapyinresourcelimitedsettings
AT fritzchristiane shouldviralloadthresholdsbeloweredrevisitingthewhodefinitionforvirologicfailureinpatientsonantiretroviraltherapyinresourcelimitedsettings
AT ehmerjochen shouldviralloadthresholdsbeloweredrevisitingthewhodefinitionforvirologicfailureinpatientsonantiretroviraltherapyinresourcelimitedsettings
AT ceruttibernard shouldviralloadthresholdsbeloweredrevisitingthewhodefinitionforvirologicfailureinpatientsonantiretroviraltherapyinresourcelimitedsettings
AT pugadaniel shouldviralloadthresholdsbeloweredrevisitingthewhodefinitionforvirologicfailureinpatientsonantiretroviraltherapyinresourcelimitedsettings
AT klimkaitthomas shouldviralloadthresholdsbeloweredrevisitingthewhodefinitionforvirologicfailureinpatientsonantiretroviraltherapyinresourcelimitedsettings