Cargando…

Systematic Review of Quality of Patient Information on Liposuction in the Internet

BACKGROUND: A large number of patients who are interested in esthetic surgery actively search the Internet, which represents nowadays the first source of information. However, the quality of information available in the Internet on liposuction is currently unknown. The aim of this study was to asses...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zuk, Grzegorz, Palma, Adrian Fernando, Eylert, Gertraud, Raptis, Dimitri Aristotle, Guggenheim, Merlin, Shafighi, Maziar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4956871/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27482498
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000000798
_version_ 1782444096409829376
author Zuk, Grzegorz
Palma, Adrian Fernando
Eylert, Gertraud
Raptis, Dimitri Aristotle
Guggenheim, Merlin
Shafighi, Maziar
author_facet Zuk, Grzegorz
Palma, Adrian Fernando
Eylert, Gertraud
Raptis, Dimitri Aristotle
Guggenheim, Merlin
Shafighi, Maziar
author_sort Zuk, Grzegorz
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A large number of patients who are interested in esthetic surgery actively search the Internet, which represents nowadays the first source of information. However, the quality of information available in the Internet on liposuction is currently unknown. The aim of this study was to assess the quality of patient information on liposuction available in the Internet. METHODS: The quantitative and qualitative assessment of Web sites was based on a modified Ensuring Quality Information for Patients tool (36 items). Five hundred Web sites were identified by the most popular web search engines. RESULTS: Two hundred forty-five Web sites were assessed after duplicates and irrelevant sources were excluded. Only 72 (29%) Web sites addressed >16 items, and scores tended to be higher for professional societies, portals, patient groups, health departments, and academic centers than for Web sites developed by physicians, respectively. The Ensuring Quality Information for Patients score achieved by Web sites ranged between 8 and 29 of total 36 points, with a median value of 16 points (interquartile range, 14–18). The top 10 Web sites with the highest scores were identified. CONCLUSIONS: The quality of patient information on liposuction available in the Internet is poor, and existing Web sites show substantial shortcomings. There is an urgent need for improvement in offering superior quality information on liposuction for patients intending to undergo this procedure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4956871
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49568712016-08-01 Systematic Review of Quality of Patient Information on Liposuction in the Internet Zuk, Grzegorz Palma, Adrian Fernando Eylert, Gertraud Raptis, Dimitri Aristotle Guggenheim, Merlin Shafighi, Maziar Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Original Article BACKGROUND: A large number of patients who are interested in esthetic surgery actively search the Internet, which represents nowadays the first source of information. However, the quality of information available in the Internet on liposuction is currently unknown. The aim of this study was to assess the quality of patient information on liposuction available in the Internet. METHODS: The quantitative and qualitative assessment of Web sites was based on a modified Ensuring Quality Information for Patients tool (36 items). Five hundred Web sites were identified by the most popular web search engines. RESULTS: Two hundred forty-five Web sites were assessed after duplicates and irrelevant sources were excluded. Only 72 (29%) Web sites addressed >16 items, and scores tended to be higher for professional societies, portals, patient groups, health departments, and academic centers than for Web sites developed by physicians, respectively. The Ensuring Quality Information for Patients score achieved by Web sites ranged between 8 and 29 of total 36 points, with a median value of 16 points (interquartile range, 14–18). The top 10 Web sites with the highest scores were identified. CONCLUSIONS: The quality of patient information on liposuction available in the Internet is poor, and existing Web sites show substantial shortcomings. There is an urgent need for improvement in offering superior quality information on liposuction for patients intending to undergo this procedure. Wolters Kluwer Health 2016-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4956871/ /pubmed/27482498 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000000798 Text en Copyright © 2016 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. All rights reserved. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially.
spellingShingle Original Article
Zuk, Grzegorz
Palma, Adrian Fernando
Eylert, Gertraud
Raptis, Dimitri Aristotle
Guggenheim, Merlin
Shafighi, Maziar
Systematic Review of Quality of Patient Information on Liposuction in the Internet
title Systematic Review of Quality of Patient Information on Liposuction in the Internet
title_full Systematic Review of Quality of Patient Information on Liposuction in the Internet
title_fullStr Systematic Review of Quality of Patient Information on Liposuction in the Internet
title_full_unstemmed Systematic Review of Quality of Patient Information on Liposuction in the Internet
title_short Systematic Review of Quality of Patient Information on Liposuction in the Internet
title_sort systematic review of quality of patient information on liposuction in the internet
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4956871/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27482498
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000000798
work_keys_str_mv AT zukgrzegorz systematicreviewofqualityofpatientinformationonliposuctionintheinternet
AT palmaadrianfernando systematicreviewofqualityofpatientinformationonliposuctionintheinternet
AT eylertgertraud systematicreviewofqualityofpatientinformationonliposuctionintheinternet
AT raptisdimitriaristotle systematicreviewofqualityofpatientinformationonliposuctionintheinternet
AT guggenheimmerlin systematicreviewofqualityofpatientinformationonliposuctionintheinternet
AT shafighimaziar systematicreviewofqualityofpatientinformationonliposuctionintheinternet