Cargando…
Systematic Review of Quality of Patient Information on Liposuction in the Internet
BACKGROUND: A large number of patients who are interested in esthetic surgery actively search the Internet, which represents nowadays the first source of information. However, the quality of information available in the Internet on liposuction is currently unknown. The aim of this study was to asses...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4956871/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27482498 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000000798 |
_version_ | 1782444096409829376 |
---|---|
author | Zuk, Grzegorz Palma, Adrian Fernando Eylert, Gertraud Raptis, Dimitri Aristotle Guggenheim, Merlin Shafighi, Maziar |
author_facet | Zuk, Grzegorz Palma, Adrian Fernando Eylert, Gertraud Raptis, Dimitri Aristotle Guggenheim, Merlin Shafighi, Maziar |
author_sort | Zuk, Grzegorz |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: A large number of patients who are interested in esthetic surgery actively search the Internet, which represents nowadays the first source of information. However, the quality of information available in the Internet on liposuction is currently unknown. The aim of this study was to assess the quality of patient information on liposuction available in the Internet. METHODS: The quantitative and qualitative assessment of Web sites was based on a modified Ensuring Quality Information for Patients tool (36 items). Five hundred Web sites were identified by the most popular web search engines. RESULTS: Two hundred forty-five Web sites were assessed after duplicates and irrelevant sources were excluded. Only 72 (29%) Web sites addressed >16 items, and scores tended to be higher for professional societies, portals, patient groups, health departments, and academic centers than for Web sites developed by physicians, respectively. The Ensuring Quality Information for Patients score achieved by Web sites ranged between 8 and 29 of total 36 points, with a median value of 16 points (interquartile range, 14–18). The top 10 Web sites with the highest scores were identified. CONCLUSIONS: The quality of patient information on liposuction available in the Internet is poor, and existing Web sites show substantial shortcomings. There is an urgent need for improvement in offering superior quality information on liposuction for patients intending to undergo this procedure. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4956871 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49568712016-08-01 Systematic Review of Quality of Patient Information on Liposuction in the Internet Zuk, Grzegorz Palma, Adrian Fernando Eylert, Gertraud Raptis, Dimitri Aristotle Guggenheim, Merlin Shafighi, Maziar Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Original Article BACKGROUND: A large number of patients who are interested in esthetic surgery actively search the Internet, which represents nowadays the first source of information. However, the quality of information available in the Internet on liposuction is currently unknown. The aim of this study was to assess the quality of patient information on liposuction available in the Internet. METHODS: The quantitative and qualitative assessment of Web sites was based on a modified Ensuring Quality Information for Patients tool (36 items). Five hundred Web sites were identified by the most popular web search engines. RESULTS: Two hundred forty-five Web sites were assessed after duplicates and irrelevant sources were excluded. Only 72 (29%) Web sites addressed >16 items, and scores tended to be higher for professional societies, portals, patient groups, health departments, and academic centers than for Web sites developed by physicians, respectively. The Ensuring Quality Information for Patients score achieved by Web sites ranged between 8 and 29 of total 36 points, with a median value of 16 points (interquartile range, 14–18). The top 10 Web sites with the highest scores were identified. CONCLUSIONS: The quality of patient information on liposuction available in the Internet is poor, and existing Web sites show substantial shortcomings. There is an urgent need for improvement in offering superior quality information on liposuction for patients intending to undergo this procedure. Wolters Kluwer Health 2016-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4956871/ /pubmed/27482498 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000000798 Text en Copyright © 2016 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. All rights reserved. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Zuk, Grzegorz Palma, Adrian Fernando Eylert, Gertraud Raptis, Dimitri Aristotle Guggenheim, Merlin Shafighi, Maziar Systematic Review of Quality of Patient Information on Liposuction in the Internet |
title | Systematic Review of Quality of Patient Information on Liposuction in the Internet |
title_full | Systematic Review of Quality of Patient Information on Liposuction in the Internet |
title_fullStr | Systematic Review of Quality of Patient Information on Liposuction in the Internet |
title_full_unstemmed | Systematic Review of Quality of Patient Information on Liposuction in the Internet |
title_short | Systematic Review of Quality of Patient Information on Liposuction in the Internet |
title_sort | systematic review of quality of patient information on liposuction in the internet |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4956871/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27482498 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000000798 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zukgrzegorz systematicreviewofqualityofpatientinformationonliposuctionintheinternet AT palmaadrianfernando systematicreviewofqualityofpatientinformationonliposuctionintheinternet AT eylertgertraud systematicreviewofqualityofpatientinformationonliposuctionintheinternet AT raptisdimitriaristotle systematicreviewofqualityofpatientinformationonliposuctionintheinternet AT guggenheimmerlin systematicreviewofqualityofpatientinformationonliposuctionintheinternet AT shafighimaziar systematicreviewofqualityofpatientinformationonliposuctionintheinternet |