Cargando…

Association between different anti-Tat antibody isotypes and HIV disease progression: data from an African cohort

BACKGROUND: The presence of IgG and IgM against Tat, an HIV protein important for viral replication and immune dysfunction, is associated with slow disease progression in clade B HIV-infected individuals. However, although Tat activities strictly depend on the viral clade, our knowledge about the im...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nicoli, Francesco, Chachage, Mkunde, Clowes, Petra, Bauer, Asli, Kowour, Dickens, Ensoli, Barbara, Cafaro, Aurelio, Maboko, Leonard, Hoelscher, Michael, Gavioli, Riccardo, Saathoff, Elmar, Geldmacher, Christof
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4957276/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27450538
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-016-1647-3
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: The presence of IgG and IgM against Tat, an HIV protein important for viral replication and immune dysfunction, is associated with slow disease progression in clade B HIV-infected individuals. However, although Tat activities strictly depend on the viral clade, our knowledge about the importance of anti-Tat antibodies in non-clade B HIV infection is poor. The objective of this study was to investigate the association of different anti-Tat antibody isotypes with disease progression in non-clade B HIV-infected subjects and to study the relationship between anti-Tat humoral responses and immunological abnormalities. METHODS: Anti-clade B and -clade C Tat IgG, IgM and IgA titers were assessed in serum samples from 96 cART-naïve subjects with chronic HIV infection from Mbeya, Tanzania, and associated with CD4(+) T cell count, plasma viremia and CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cell phenotypes. RESULTS: Anti-Tat IgM were preferentially detected in chronic HIV-infected subjects with low T cell activation (p-value = 0.03) and correlated with higher CD4(+) T cell counts and lower viral loads irrespective of the duration of infection (p-value = 0.019 and p-value = 0.037 respectively). Conversely, anti-Tat IgA were preferentially detected in individuals with low CD4(+) T cell counts and high viral load (p-value = 0.02 and p-value < 0.001 respectively). The simultaneous presence of anti-Tat IgG and IgM protected from fast CD4(+) T cell decline (p-value < 0.01) and accumulation of CD38(+)HLADR(+)CD8(+) T cells (p- value = 0.029). CONCLUSIONS: Anti-Tat IgG alone are not protective in non-clade B infected subjects, unless concomitant with IgM, suggesting a protective role of persistent anti-Tat IgM irrespective of the infecting clade. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12879-016-1647-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.