Cargando…
Comparative effectiveness of adding weight control simultaneously or sequentially to smoking cessation quitlines: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Prevalence of multiple health risk behaviors is growing, and obesity and smoking are costly. Weight gain associated with quitting smoking is common and can interfere with quit success. Efficacy of adding weight management to tobacco cessation treatment has been tested with women in group...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4957297/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27443485 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3231-6 |
_version_ | 1782444155019984896 |
---|---|
author | Bush, Terry Lovejoy, Jennifer Javitz, Harold Magnusson, Brooke Torres, Alula Jimenez Mahuna, Stacey Benedict, Cody Wassum, Ken Spring, Bonnie |
author_facet | Bush, Terry Lovejoy, Jennifer Javitz, Harold Magnusson, Brooke Torres, Alula Jimenez Mahuna, Stacey Benedict, Cody Wassum, Ken Spring, Bonnie |
author_sort | Bush, Terry |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Prevalence of multiple health risk behaviors is growing, and obesity and smoking are costly. Weight gain associated with quitting smoking is common and can interfere with quit success. Efficacy of adding weight management to tobacco cessation treatment has been tested with women in group sessions over an extended period of time, but has never been tested in real-world settings with men and women seeking help to quit. This paper describes the Best Quit study which tests the effectiveness of delivering tobacco and weight control interventions via existing quitline infrastructures. METHODS: Eligible and consenting smokers (n = 2550) who call a telephone quitline will be randomized to one of three groups; the standard quitline or standard quitline plus a weight management program added either simultaneously or sequentially to the tobacco program. The study aims to test: 1) the effectiveness of the combined intervention on smoking cessation and weight, 2) the cost-effectiveness of the combined intervention on cessation and weight and 3) theoretically pre-specified mediators of treatment effects on cessation: reduced weight concerns, increased outcome expectancies about quitting and improved self-efficacy about quitting without weight gain. Baseline, 6 month and 12 month data will be analyzed using multivariate statistical analyses and groups will be compared on treatment adherence, quit rates and change in weight among abstinent participants. To determine if the association between group assignment and primary outcomes (30-day abstinence and change in weight at 6 months) is moderated by pre-determined baseline and process measures, interaction terms will be included in the regression models and their significance assessed. DISCUSSION: This study will generate information to inform whether adding weight management to a tobacco cessation intervention delivered by phone, mail and web for smokers seeking help to quit will help or harm quit rates and whether a simultaneous or sequential approach is better at increasing abstinence and reducing weight gain post quit. If proven effective, the combined intervention could be disseminated across the U.S. through quitlines and could encourage additional smokers who have not sought cessation treatment for fear of gaining weight to make quit attempts. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01867983. Registered: May 30, 2013 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12889-016-3231-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4957297 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49572972016-07-23 Comparative effectiveness of adding weight control simultaneously or sequentially to smoking cessation quitlines: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial Bush, Terry Lovejoy, Jennifer Javitz, Harold Magnusson, Brooke Torres, Alula Jimenez Mahuna, Stacey Benedict, Cody Wassum, Ken Spring, Bonnie BMC Public Health Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Prevalence of multiple health risk behaviors is growing, and obesity and smoking are costly. Weight gain associated with quitting smoking is common and can interfere with quit success. Efficacy of adding weight management to tobacco cessation treatment has been tested with women in group sessions over an extended period of time, but has never been tested in real-world settings with men and women seeking help to quit. This paper describes the Best Quit study which tests the effectiveness of delivering tobacco and weight control interventions via existing quitline infrastructures. METHODS: Eligible and consenting smokers (n = 2550) who call a telephone quitline will be randomized to one of three groups; the standard quitline or standard quitline plus a weight management program added either simultaneously or sequentially to the tobacco program. The study aims to test: 1) the effectiveness of the combined intervention on smoking cessation and weight, 2) the cost-effectiveness of the combined intervention on cessation and weight and 3) theoretically pre-specified mediators of treatment effects on cessation: reduced weight concerns, increased outcome expectancies about quitting and improved self-efficacy about quitting without weight gain. Baseline, 6 month and 12 month data will be analyzed using multivariate statistical analyses and groups will be compared on treatment adherence, quit rates and change in weight among abstinent participants. To determine if the association between group assignment and primary outcomes (30-day abstinence and change in weight at 6 months) is moderated by pre-determined baseline and process measures, interaction terms will be included in the regression models and their significance assessed. DISCUSSION: This study will generate information to inform whether adding weight management to a tobacco cessation intervention delivered by phone, mail and web for smokers seeking help to quit will help or harm quit rates and whether a simultaneous or sequential approach is better at increasing abstinence and reducing weight gain post quit. If proven effective, the combined intervention could be disseminated across the U.S. through quitlines and could encourage additional smokers who have not sought cessation treatment for fear of gaining weight to make quit attempts. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01867983. Registered: May 30, 2013 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12889-016-3231-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-07-22 /pmc/articles/PMC4957297/ /pubmed/27443485 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3231-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Bush, Terry Lovejoy, Jennifer Javitz, Harold Magnusson, Brooke Torres, Alula Jimenez Mahuna, Stacey Benedict, Cody Wassum, Ken Spring, Bonnie Comparative effectiveness of adding weight control simultaneously or sequentially to smoking cessation quitlines: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial |
title | Comparative effectiveness of adding weight control simultaneously or sequentially to smoking cessation quitlines: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Comparative effectiveness of adding weight control simultaneously or sequentially to smoking cessation quitlines: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Comparative effectiveness of adding weight control simultaneously or sequentially to smoking cessation quitlines: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative effectiveness of adding weight control simultaneously or sequentially to smoking cessation quitlines: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Comparative effectiveness of adding weight control simultaneously or sequentially to smoking cessation quitlines: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | comparative effectiveness of adding weight control simultaneously or sequentially to smoking cessation quitlines: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4957297/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27443485 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3231-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bushterry comparativeeffectivenessofaddingweightcontrolsimultaneouslyorsequentiallytosmokingcessationquitlinesstudyprotocolofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT lovejoyjennifer comparativeeffectivenessofaddingweightcontrolsimultaneouslyorsequentiallytosmokingcessationquitlinesstudyprotocolofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT javitzharold comparativeeffectivenessofaddingweightcontrolsimultaneouslyorsequentiallytosmokingcessationquitlinesstudyprotocolofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT magnussonbrooke comparativeeffectivenessofaddingweightcontrolsimultaneouslyorsequentiallytosmokingcessationquitlinesstudyprotocolofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT torresalulajimenez comparativeeffectivenessofaddingweightcontrolsimultaneouslyorsequentiallytosmokingcessationquitlinesstudyprotocolofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT mahunastacey comparativeeffectivenessofaddingweightcontrolsimultaneouslyorsequentiallytosmokingcessationquitlinesstudyprotocolofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT benedictcody comparativeeffectivenessofaddingweightcontrolsimultaneouslyorsequentiallytosmokingcessationquitlinesstudyprotocolofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT wassumken comparativeeffectivenessofaddingweightcontrolsimultaneouslyorsequentiallytosmokingcessationquitlinesstudyprotocolofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT springbonnie comparativeeffectivenessofaddingweightcontrolsimultaneouslyorsequentiallytosmokingcessationquitlinesstudyprotocolofarandomizedcontrolledtrial |