Cargando…

Association between community socioeconomic factors, animal feeding operations, and campylobacteriosis incidence rates: Foodborne Diseases Active Surveillance Network (FoodNet), 2004–2010

BACKGROUND: Campylobacter is a leading cause of foodborne illness in the United States. Campylobacter infections have been associated with individual risk factors, such as the consumption of poultry and raw milk. Recently, a Maryland-based study identified community socioeconomic and environmental f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rosenberg Goldstein, Rachel E., Cruz-Cano, Raul, Jiang, Chengsheng, Palmer, Amanda, Blythe, David, Ryan, Patricia, Hogan, Brenna, White, Benjamin, Dunn, John R., Libby, Tanya, Tobin-D’Angelo, Melissa, Huang, Jennifer Y., McGuire, Suzanne, Scherzinger, Karen, Lee, Mei-Ling Ting, Sapkota, Amy R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4957341/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27450432
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-016-1686-9
_version_ 1782444164839899136
author Rosenberg Goldstein, Rachel E.
Cruz-Cano, Raul
Jiang, Chengsheng
Palmer, Amanda
Blythe, David
Ryan, Patricia
Hogan, Brenna
White, Benjamin
Dunn, John R.
Libby, Tanya
Tobin-D’Angelo, Melissa
Huang, Jennifer Y.
McGuire, Suzanne
Scherzinger, Karen
Lee, Mei-Ling Ting
Sapkota, Amy R.
author_facet Rosenberg Goldstein, Rachel E.
Cruz-Cano, Raul
Jiang, Chengsheng
Palmer, Amanda
Blythe, David
Ryan, Patricia
Hogan, Brenna
White, Benjamin
Dunn, John R.
Libby, Tanya
Tobin-D’Angelo, Melissa
Huang, Jennifer Y.
McGuire, Suzanne
Scherzinger, Karen
Lee, Mei-Ling Ting
Sapkota, Amy R.
author_sort Rosenberg Goldstein, Rachel E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Campylobacter is a leading cause of foodborne illness in the United States. Campylobacter infections have been associated with individual risk factors, such as the consumption of poultry and raw milk. Recently, a Maryland-based study identified community socioeconomic and environmental factors that are also associated with campylobacteriosis rates. However, no previous studies have evaluated the association between community risk factors and campylobacteriosis rates across multiple U.S. states. METHODS: We obtained Campylobacter case data (2004–2010; n = 40,768) from the Foodborne Diseases Active Surveillance Network (FoodNet) and socioeconomic and environmental data from the 2010 Census of Population and Housing, the 2011 American Community Survey, and the 2007 U.S. Census of Agriculture. We linked data by zip code and derived incidence rate ratios using negative binomial regression models. RESULTS: Community socioeconomic and environmental factors were associated with both lower and higher campylobacteriosis rates. Zip codes with higher percentages of African Americans had lower rates of campylobacteriosis (incidence rate ratio [IRR]) = 0.972; 95 % confidence interval (CI) = 0.970,0.974). In Georgia, Maryland, and Tennessee, three leading broiler chicken producing states, zip codes with broiler operations had incidence rates that were 22 % (IRR = 1.22; 95 % CI = 1.03,1.43), 16 % (IRR = 1.16; 95 % CI = 0.99,1.37), and 35 % (IRR = 1.35; 95 % CI = 1.18,1.53) higher, respectively, than those of zip codes without broiler operations. In Minnesota and New York FoodNet counties, two top dairy producing areas, zip codes with dairy operations had significantly higher campylobacteriosis incidence rates (IRR = 1.37; 95 % CI = 1.22, 1.55; IRR = 1.19; 95 % CI = 1.04,1.36). CONCLUSIONS: Community socioeconomic and environmental factors are important to consider when evaluating the relationship between possible risk factors and Campylobacter infection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4957341
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49573412016-07-26 Association between community socioeconomic factors, animal feeding operations, and campylobacteriosis incidence rates: Foodborne Diseases Active Surveillance Network (FoodNet), 2004–2010 Rosenberg Goldstein, Rachel E. Cruz-Cano, Raul Jiang, Chengsheng Palmer, Amanda Blythe, David Ryan, Patricia Hogan, Brenna White, Benjamin Dunn, John R. Libby, Tanya Tobin-D’Angelo, Melissa Huang, Jennifer Y. McGuire, Suzanne Scherzinger, Karen Lee, Mei-Ling Ting Sapkota, Amy R. BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: Campylobacter is a leading cause of foodborne illness in the United States. Campylobacter infections have been associated with individual risk factors, such as the consumption of poultry and raw milk. Recently, a Maryland-based study identified community socioeconomic and environmental factors that are also associated with campylobacteriosis rates. However, no previous studies have evaluated the association between community risk factors and campylobacteriosis rates across multiple U.S. states. METHODS: We obtained Campylobacter case data (2004–2010; n = 40,768) from the Foodborne Diseases Active Surveillance Network (FoodNet) and socioeconomic and environmental data from the 2010 Census of Population and Housing, the 2011 American Community Survey, and the 2007 U.S. Census of Agriculture. We linked data by zip code and derived incidence rate ratios using negative binomial regression models. RESULTS: Community socioeconomic and environmental factors were associated with both lower and higher campylobacteriosis rates. Zip codes with higher percentages of African Americans had lower rates of campylobacteriosis (incidence rate ratio [IRR]) = 0.972; 95 % confidence interval (CI) = 0.970,0.974). In Georgia, Maryland, and Tennessee, three leading broiler chicken producing states, zip codes with broiler operations had incidence rates that were 22 % (IRR = 1.22; 95 % CI = 1.03,1.43), 16 % (IRR = 1.16; 95 % CI = 0.99,1.37), and 35 % (IRR = 1.35; 95 % CI = 1.18,1.53) higher, respectively, than those of zip codes without broiler operations. In Minnesota and New York FoodNet counties, two top dairy producing areas, zip codes with dairy operations had significantly higher campylobacteriosis incidence rates (IRR = 1.37; 95 % CI = 1.22, 1.55; IRR = 1.19; 95 % CI = 1.04,1.36). CONCLUSIONS: Community socioeconomic and environmental factors are important to consider when evaluating the relationship between possible risk factors and Campylobacter infection. BioMed Central 2016-07-22 /pmc/articles/PMC4957341/ /pubmed/27450432 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-016-1686-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Rosenberg Goldstein, Rachel E.
Cruz-Cano, Raul
Jiang, Chengsheng
Palmer, Amanda
Blythe, David
Ryan, Patricia
Hogan, Brenna
White, Benjamin
Dunn, John R.
Libby, Tanya
Tobin-D’Angelo, Melissa
Huang, Jennifer Y.
McGuire, Suzanne
Scherzinger, Karen
Lee, Mei-Ling Ting
Sapkota, Amy R.
Association between community socioeconomic factors, animal feeding operations, and campylobacteriosis incidence rates: Foodborne Diseases Active Surveillance Network (FoodNet), 2004–2010
title Association between community socioeconomic factors, animal feeding operations, and campylobacteriosis incidence rates: Foodborne Diseases Active Surveillance Network (FoodNet), 2004–2010
title_full Association between community socioeconomic factors, animal feeding operations, and campylobacteriosis incidence rates: Foodborne Diseases Active Surveillance Network (FoodNet), 2004–2010
title_fullStr Association between community socioeconomic factors, animal feeding operations, and campylobacteriosis incidence rates: Foodborne Diseases Active Surveillance Network (FoodNet), 2004–2010
title_full_unstemmed Association between community socioeconomic factors, animal feeding operations, and campylobacteriosis incidence rates: Foodborne Diseases Active Surveillance Network (FoodNet), 2004–2010
title_short Association between community socioeconomic factors, animal feeding operations, and campylobacteriosis incidence rates: Foodborne Diseases Active Surveillance Network (FoodNet), 2004–2010
title_sort association between community socioeconomic factors, animal feeding operations, and campylobacteriosis incidence rates: foodborne diseases active surveillance network (foodnet), 2004–2010
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4957341/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27450432
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-016-1686-9
work_keys_str_mv AT rosenberggoldsteinrachele associationbetweencommunitysocioeconomicfactorsanimalfeedingoperationsandcampylobacteriosisincidenceratesfoodbornediseasesactivesurveillancenetworkfoodnet20042010
AT cruzcanoraul associationbetweencommunitysocioeconomicfactorsanimalfeedingoperationsandcampylobacteriosisincidenceratesfoodbornediseasesactivesurveillancenetworkfoodnet20042010
AT jiangchengsheng associationbetweencommunitysocioeconomicfactorsanimalfeedingoperationsandcampylobacteriosisincidenceratesfoodbornediseasesactivesurveillancenetworkfoodnet20042010
AT palmeramanda associationbetweencommunitysocioeconomicfactorsanimalfeedingoperationsandcampylobacteriosisincidenceratesfoodbornediseasesactivesurveillancenetworkfoodnet20042010
AT blythedavid associationbetweencommunitysocioeconomicfactorsanimalfeedingoperationsandcampylobacteriosisincidenceratesfoodbornediseasesactivesurveillancenetworkfoodnet20042010
AT ryanpatricia associationbetweencommunitysocioeconomicfactorsanimalfeedingoperationsandcampylobacteriosisincidenceratesfoodbornediseasesactivesurveillancenetworkfoodnet20042010
AT hoganbrenna associationbetweencommunitysocioeconomicfactorsanimalfeedingoperationsandcampylobacteriosisincidenceratesfoodbornediseasesactivesurveillancenetworkfoodnet20042010
AT whitebenjamin associationbetweencommunitysocioeconomicfactorsanimalfeedingoperationsandcampylobacteriosisincidenceratesfoodbornediseasesactivesurveillancenetworkfoodnet20042010
AT dunnjohnr associationbetweencommunitysocioeconomicfactorsanimalfeedingoperationsandcampylobacteriosisincidenceratesfoodbornediseasesactivesurveillancenetworkfoodnet20042010
AT libbytanya associationbetweencommunitysocioeconomicfactorsanimalfeedingoperationsandcampylobacteriosisincidenceratesfoodbornediseasesactivesurveillancenetworkfoodnet20042010
AT tobindangelomelissa associationbetweencommunitysocioeconomicfactorsanimalfeedingoperationsandcampylobacteriosisincidenceratesfoodbornediseasesactivesurveillancenetworkfoodnet20042010
AT huangjennifery associationbetweencommunitysocioeconomicfactorsanimalfeedingoperationsandcampylobacteriosisincidenceratesfoodbornediseasesactivesurveillancenetworkfoodnet20042010
AT mcguiresuzanne associationbetweencommunitysocioeconomicfactorsanimalfeedingoperationsandcampylobacteriosisincidenceratesfoodbornediseasesactivesurveillancenetworkfoodnet20042010
AT scherzingerkaren associationbetweencommunitysocioeconomicfactorsanimalfeedingoperationsandcampylobacteriosisincidenceratesfoodbornediseasesactivesurveillancenetworkfoodnet20042010
AT leemeilingting associationbetweencommunitysocioeconomicfactorsanimalfeedingoperationsandcampylobacteriosisincidenceratesfoodbornediseasesactivesurveillancenetworkfoodnet20042010
AT sapkotaamyr associationbetweencommunitysocioeconomicfactorsanimalfeedingoperationsandcampylobacteriosisincidenceratesfoodbornediseasesactivesurveillancenetworkfoodnet20042010