Cargando…

‘How shall we survive’: a qualitative study of women’s experiences following denial of menstrual regulation (MR) services in Bangladesh

BACKGROUND: About one quarter of women in Bangladesh are denied menstrual regulation (MR) due to advanced gestation [J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care 41(3):161-163, 2015, Issues Brief (Alan Guttmacher Inst) (3):1-8, 2012]. Little is known about barriers to MR services, and whether women denied MR seek...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hossain, Altaf, Moseson, Heidi, Raifman, Sarah, Gerdts, Caitlin, Biswas, Kamal Kanti, Foster, Diana Greene
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4957356/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27449219
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12978-016-0199-8
_version_ 1782444168336900096
author Hossain, Altaf
Moseson, Heidi
Raifman, Sarah
Gerdts, Caitlin
Biswas, Kamal Kanti
Foster, Diana Greene
author_facet Hossain, Altaf
Moseson, Heidi
Raifman, Sarah
Gerdts, Caitlin
Biswas, Kamal Kanti
Foster, Diana Greene
author_sort Hossain, Altaf
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: About one quarter of women in Bangladesh are denied menstrual regulation (MR) due to advanced gestation [J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care 41(3):161-163, 2015, Issues Brief (Alan Guttmacher Inst) (3):1-8, 2012]. Little is known about barriers to MR services, and whether women denied MR seek abortion elsewhere, self-induce, or continue the pregnancy. METHODS: After obtaining authorization from four health facilities in Bangladesh, we recruited eligible and interested women in to the study and requested informed consent for study participation. We conducted in-depth interviews with 20 women denied MR from four facilities in four districts in Bangladesh. Interviews were translated and transcribed, and the transcripts were analyzed by two researchers through an iterative process using a qualitative content analysis approach. RESULTS: Of those interviewed, 12 women sought abortion elsewhere and eight of these women were successful; four women who sought subsequent services were denied again. Two of the eight women who subsequently terminated their pregnancies suffered from complications. None of the participants were aware of the legal gestational limit for government-approved MR services. Given that all participants were initially denied services because they were beyond the legal gestational limit for MR and there were no reported risks to any of the mothers’ health, we presume that the eight terminations performed subsequently were done illegally. CONCLUSIONS: Barriers to seeking safe MR services need to be addressed to reduce utilization of potentially unsafe alternative abortion services and to improve women’s health and well being in Bangladesh. Findings from this study indicate a need to raise awareness about legal MR services; provide information to women on where, how and when they can access these services; train more MR providers; improve the quality and safety of second trimester services; and strengthen campaigns to educate women about contraception and pregnancy risk throughout the reproductive lifespan to prevent unintended pregnancies. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12978-016-0199-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4957356
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49573562016-07-23 ‘How shall we survive’: a qualitative study of women’s experiences following denial of menstrual regulation (MR) services in Bangladesh Hossain, Altaf Moseson, Heidi Raifman, Sarah Gerdts, Caitlin Biswas, Kamal Kanti Foster, Diana Greene Reprod Health Research BACKGROUND: About one quarter of women in Bangladesh are denied menstrual regulation (MR) due to advanced gestation [J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care 41(3):161-163, 2015, Issues Brief (Alan Guttmacher Inst) (3):1-8, 2012]. Little is known about barriers to MR services, and whether women denied MR seek abortion elsewhere, self-induce, or continue the pregnancy. METHODS: After obtaining authorization from four health facilities in Bangladesh, we recruited eligible and interested women in to the study and requested informed consent for study participation. We conducted in-depth interviews with 20 women denied MR from four facilities in four districts in Bangladesh. Interviews were translated and transcribed, and the transcripts were analyzed by two researchers through an iterative process using a qualitative content analysis approach. RESULTS: Of those interviewed, 12 women sought abortion elsewhere and eight of these women were successful; four women who sought subsequent services were denied again. Two of the eight women who subsequently terminated their pregnancies suffered from complications. None of the participants were aware of the legal gestational limit for government-approved MR services. Given that all participants were initially denied services because they were beyond the legal gestational limit for MR and there were no reported risks to any of the mothers’ health, we presume that the eight terminations performed subsequently were done illegally. CONCLUSIONS: Barriers to seeking safe MR services need to be addressed to reduce utilization of potentially unsafe alternative abortion services and to improve women’s health and well being in Bangladesh. Findings from this study indicate a need to raise awareness about legal MR services; provide information to women on where, how and when they can access these services; train more MR providers; improve the quality and safety of second trimester services; and strengthen campaigns to educate women about contraception and pregnancy risk throughout the reproductive lifespan to prevent unintended pregnancies. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12978-016-0199-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-07-22 /pmc/articles/PMC4957356/ /pubmed/27449219 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12978-016-0199-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Hossain, Altaf
Moseson, Heidi
Raifman, Sarah
Gerdts, Caitlin
Biswas, Kamal Kanti
Foster, Diana Greene
‘How shall we survive’: a qualitative study of women’s experiences following denial of menstrual regulation (MR) services in Bangladesh
title ‘How shall we survive’: a qualitative study of women’s experiences following denial of menstrual regulation (MR) services in Bangladesh
title_full ‘How shall we survive’: a qualitative study of women’s experiences following denial of menstrual regulation (MR) services in Bangladesh
title_fullStr ‘How shall we survive’: a qualitative study of women’s experiences following denial of menstrual regulation (MR) services in Bangladesh
title_full_unstemmed ‘How shall we survive’: a qualitative study of women’s experiences following denial of menstrual regulation (MR) services in Bangladesh
title_short ‘How shall we survive’: a qualitative study of women’s experiences following denial of menstrual regulation (MR) services in Bangladesh
title_sort ‘how shall we survive’: a qualitative study of women’s experiences following denial of menstrual regulation (mr) services in bangladesh
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4957356/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27449219
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12978-016-0199-8
work_keys_str_mv AT hossainaltaf howshallwesurviveaqualitativestudyofwomensexperiencesfollowingdenialofmenstrualregulationmrservicesinbangladesh
AT mosesonheidi howshallwesurviveaqualitativestudyofwomensexperiencesfollowingdenialofmenstrualregulationmrservicesinbangladesh
AT raifmansarah howshallwesurviveaqualitativestudyofwomensexperiencesfollowingdenialofmenstrualregulationmrservicesinbangladesh
AT gerdtscaitlin howshallwesurviveaqualitativestudyofwomensexperiencesfollowingdenialofmenstrualregulationmrservicesinbangladesh
AT biswaskamalkanti howshallwesurviveaqualitativestudyofwomensexperiencesfollowingdenialofmenstrualregulationmrservicesinbangladesh
AT fosterdianagreene howshallwesurviveaqualitativestudyofwomensexperiencesfollowingdenialofmenstrualregulationmrservicesinbangladesh