Cargando…
A systematic review of interventions to provide genetics education for primary care
BACKGROUND: At least 10 % of patients seen in primary care are said to have a condition in which genetics has an influence. However, patients at risk of genetic disease may not be recognised, while those who seek advice may not be referred or managed appropriately. Primary care practitioners lack kn...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4957387/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27445117 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-016-0483-2 |
_version_ | 1782444175017377792 |
---|---|
author | Paneque, Milena Turchetti, Daniela Jackson, Leigh Lunt, Peter Houwink, Elisa Skirton, Heather |
author_facet | Paneque, Milena Turchetti, Daniela Jackson, Leigh Lunt, Peter Houwink, Elisa Skirton, Heather |
author_sort | Paneque, Milena |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: At least 10 % of patients seen in primary care are said to have a condition in which genetics has an influence. However, patients at risk of genetic disease may not be recognised, while those who seek advice may not be referred or managed appropriately. Primary care practitioners lack knowledge of genetics and genetic testing relevant for daily practice and feel inadequate to deliver genetic services. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate genetics educational interventions in the context of primary care. METHODS: Following the process for systematic reviews developed by the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, we conducted a search of five relevant electronic databases. Primary research papers were eligible for inclusion if they included data on outcomes of interventions regarding genetics education for primary care practitioners. The results from each paper were coded and grouped under themes. RESULTS: Eleven studies were included in the review. The five major themes identified inductively (post hoc) were: prior experience, changes in confidence, changes in knowledge, changes in practice, satisfaction and feedback. In five of the studies, knowledge of practitioners was improved following the educational programmes, but this tended to be in specific topic areas, while practitioner confidence improved in six studies. However, there was little apparent change to practice. CONCLUSIONS: There are insufficient studies of relevant quality to inform educational interventions in genetics for primary care practitioners. Educational initiatives should be assessed using changes in practice, as well as in confidence and knowledge, to determine if they are effective in causing significant changes in practice in genetic risk assessment and appropriate management of patients. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12875-016-0483-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4957387 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49573872016-07-23 A systematic review of interventions to provide genetics education for primary care Paneque, Milena Turchetti, Daniela Jackson, Leigh Lunt, Peter Houwink, Elisa Skirton, Heather BMC Fam Pract Research Article BACKGROUND: At least 10 % of patients seen in primary care are said to have a condition in which genetics has an influence. However, patients at risk of genetic disease may not be recognised, while those who seek advice may not be referred or managed appropriately. Primary care practitioners lack knowledge of genetics and genetic testing relevant for daily practice and feel inadequate to deliver genetic services. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate genetics educational interventions in the context of primary care. METHODS: Following the process for systematic reviews developed by the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, we conducted a search of five relevant electronic databases. Primary research papers were eligible for inclusion if they included data on outcomes of interventions regarding genetics education for primary care practitioners. The results from each paper were coded and grouped under themes. RESULTS: Eleven studies were included in the review. The five major themes identified inductively (post hoc) were: prior experience, changes in confidence, changes in knowledge, changes in practice, satisfaction and feedback. In five of the studies, knowledge of practitioners was improved following the educational programmes, but this tended to be in specific topic areas, while practitioner confidence improved in six studies. However, there was little apparent change to practice. CONCLUSIONS: There are insufficient studies of relevant quality to inform educational interventions in genetics for primary care practitioners. Educational initiatives should be assessed using changes in practice, as well as in confidence and knowledge, to determine if they are effective in causing significant changes in practice in genetic risk assessment and appropriate management of patients. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12875-016-0483-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-07-22 /pmc/articles/PMC4957387/ /pubmed/27445117 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-016-0483-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Paneque, Milena Turchetti, Daniela Jackson, Leigh Lunt, Peter Houwink, Elisa Skirton, Heather A systematic review of interventions to provide genetics education for primary care |
title | A systematic review of interventions to provide genetics education for primary care |
title_full | A systematic review of interventions to provide genetics education for primary care |
title_fullStr | A systematic review of interventions to provide genetics education for primary care |
title_full_unstemmed | A systematic review of interventions to provide genetics education for primary care |
title_short | A systematic review of interventions to provide genetics education for primary care |
title_sort | systematic review of interventions to provide genetics education for primary care |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4957387/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27445117 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-016-0483-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT panequemilena asystematicreviewofinterventionstoprovidegeneticseducationforprimarycare AT turchettidaniela asystematicreviewofinterventionstoprovidegeneticseducationforprimarycare AT jacksonleigh asystematicreviewofinterventionstoprovidegeneticseducationforprimarycare AT luntpeter asystematicreviewofinterventionstoprovidegeneticseducationforprimarycare AT houwinkelisa asystematicreviewofinterventionstoprovidegeneticseducationforprimarycare AT skirtonheather asystematicreviewofinterventionstoprovidegeneticseducationforprimarycare AT panequemilena systematicreviewofinterventionstoprovidegeneticseducationforprimarycare AT turchettidaniela systematicreviewofinterventionstoprovidegeneticseducationforprimarycare AT jacksonleigh systematicreviewofinterventionstoprovidegeneticseducationforprimarycare AT luntpeter systematicreviewofinterventionstoprovidegeneticseducationforprimarycare AT houwinkelisa systematicreviewofinterventionstoprovidegeneticseducationforprimarycare AT skirtonheather systematicreviewofinterventionstoprovidegeneticseducationforprimarycare |