Cargando…
How outcome prediction could affect patient decision making in knee replacements: a qualitative study
BACKGROUND: There is approximately a 17 % dissatisfaction rate with knee replacements. Calls for tools that can pre-operatively identify patients at risk of being dissatisfied have been widespread. However, it is not known how to present such information to patients, how it would affect their decisi...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4957427/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27444429 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-016-1165-x |
_version_ | 1782444181954756608 |
---|---|
author | Barlow, Timothy Scott, Patricia Griffin, Damian Realpe, Alba |
author_facet | Barlow, Timothy Scott, Patricia Griffin, Damian Realpe, Alba |
author_sort | Barlow, Timothy |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: There is approximately a 17 % dissatisfaction rate with knee replacements. Calls for tools that can pre-operatively identify patients at risk of being dissatisfied have been widespread. However, it is not known how to present such information to patients, how it would affect their decision making process, and at what part of the pathway such a tool should be used. METHODS: Using focus groups involving 12 participants and in-depth interviews with 10 participants, we examined how individual predictions of outcome could affect patients’ decision making by providing fictitious predictions to patients at different stages of treatment. A thematic analysis was used to analyse the data. RESULTS: Our results demonstrate several interesting findings. Firstly, patients who have received information from friends and family are unwilling to adjust their expectation of outcome down (i.e. to a worse outcome), but highly willing to adjust it up (to a better outcome). This is an example of the optimism bias, and suggests that the effect on expectation of a poor outcome prediction would be blunted. Secondly, patients generally wanted a “bottom line” outcome, rather than lots of detail. Thirdly, patients who were earlier in their treatment for osteoarthritis were more likely to find the information useful, and it was more likely to affect their decision, than patients later in their treatment pathway. CONCLUSION: This research suggest that an outcome prediction tool would have most effect targeted towards people at the start of their treatment pathway, with a “bottom line” prediction of outcome. However, any effect on expectation and decision making of a poor outcome prediction is likely to be blunted by the optimism bias. These findings merit replication in a larger sample size. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12891-016-1165-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4957427 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49574272016-07-23 How outcome prediction could affect patient decision making in knee replacements: a qualitative study Barlow, Timothy Scott, Patricia Griffin, Damian Realpe, Alba BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: There is approximately a 17 % dissatisfaction rate with knee replacements. Calls for tools that can pre-operatively identify patients at risk of being dissatisfied have been widespread. However, it is not known how to present such information to patients, how it would affect their decision making process, and at what part of the pathway such a tool should be used. METHODS: Using focus groups involving 12 participants and in-depth interviews with 10 participants, we examined how individual predictions of outcome could affect patients’ decision making by providing fictitious predictions to patients at different stages of treatment. A thematic analysis was used to analyse the data. RESULTS: Our results demonstrate several interesting findings. Firstly, patients who have received information from friends and family are unwilling to adjust their expectation of outcome down (i.e. to a worse outcome), but highly willing to adjust it up (to a better outcome). This is an example of the optimism bias, and suggests that the effect on expectation of a poor outcome prediction would be blunted. Secondly, patients generally wanted a “bottom line” outcome, rather than lots of detail. Thirdly, patients who were earlier in their treatment for osteoarthritis were more likely to find the information useful, and it was more likely to affect their decision, than patients later in their treatment pathway. CONCLUSION: This research suggest that an outcome prediction tool would have most effect targeted towards people at the start of their treatment pathway, with a “bottom line” prediction of outcome. However, any effect on expectation and decision making of a poor outcome prediction is likely to be blunted by the optimism bias. These findings merit replication in a larger sample size. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12891-016-1165-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-07-22 /pmc/articles/PMC4957427/ /pubmed/27444429 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-016-1165-x Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Barlow, Timothy Scott, Patricia Griffin, Damian Realpe, Alba How outcome prediction could affect patient decision making in knee replacements: a qualitative study |
title | How outcome prediction could affect patient decision making in knee replacements: a qualitative study |
title_full | How outcome prediction could affect patient decision making in knee replacements: a qualitative study |
title_fullStr | How outcome prediction could affect patient decision making in knee replacements: a qualitative study |
title_full_unstemmed | How outcome prediction could affect patient decision making in knee replacements: a qualitative study |
title_short | How outcome prediction could affect patient decision making in knee replacements: a qualitative study |
title_sort | how outcome prediction could affect patient decision making in knee replacements: a qualitative study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4957427/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27444429 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-016-1165-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT barlowtimothy howoutcomepredictioncouldaffectpatientdecisionmakinginkneereplacementsaqualitativestudy AT scottpatricia howoutcomepredictioncouldaffectpatientdecisionmakinginkneereplacementsaqualitativestudy AT griffindamian howoutcomepredictioncouldaffectpatientdecisionmakinginkneereplacementsaqualitativestudy AT realpealba howoutcomepredictioncouldaffectpatientdecisionmakinginkneereplacementsaqualitativestudy |