Cargando…

Comparative Evaluation of Crystalloid Resuscitation Rate in a Human Model of Compensated Haemorrhagic Shock

INTRODUCTION: The most effective rate of fluid resuscitation in haemorrhagic shock is unknown. METHODS: We performed a randomized crossover pilot study in a healthy volunteer model of compensated haemorrhagic shock. Following venesection of 15 mL/kg of blood, participants were randomized to 20 mL/kg...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ho, Loretta, Lau, Lawrence, Churilov, Leonid, Riedel, Bernhard, McNicol, Larry, Hahn, Robert G., Weinberg, Laurence
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4957966/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26974423
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SHK.0000000000000610
_version_ 1782444256224346112
author Ho, Loretta
Lau, Lawrence
Churilov, Leonid
Riedel, Bernhard
McNicol, Larry
Hahn, Robert G.
Weinberg, Laurence
author_facet Ho, Loretta
Lau, Lawrence
Churilov, Leonid
Riedel, Bernhard
McNicol, Larry
Hahn, Robert G.
Weinberg, Laurence
author_sort Ho, Loretta
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The most effective rate of fluid resuscitation in haemorrhagic shock is unknown. METHODS: We performed a randomized crossover pilot study in a healthy volunteer model of compensated haemorrhagic shock. Following venesection of 15 mL/kg of blood, participants were randomized to 20 mL/kg of crystalloid over 10 min (FAST treatment) or 30 min (SLOW treatment). The primary end point was oxygen delivery (DO(2)). Secondary end points included pressure and flow-based haemodynamic variables, blood volume expansion, and clinical biochemistry. RESULTS: Nine normotensive healthy adult volunteers participated. No significant differences were observed in DO(2) and biochemical variables between the SLOW and FAST groups. Blood volume was reduced by 16% following venesection, with a corresponding 5% reduction in cardiac index (CI) (P < 0.001). Immediately following resuscitation the increase in blood volume corresponded to 54% of the infused volume under FAST treatment and 69% of the infused volume under SLOW treatment (P = 0.03). This blood volume expansion attenuated with time to 24% and 25% of the infused volume 30 min postinfusion. During fluid resuscitation, blood pressure was higher under FAST treatment. However, CI paradoxically decreased in most participants during the resuscitation phase; a finding not observed under SLOW treatment. CONCLUSION: FAST or SLOW fluid resuscitation had no significant impact on DO(2) between treatment groups. In both groups, changes in CI and blood pressure did not reflect the magnitude of intravascular blood volume deficit. Crystalloid resuscitation expanded intravascular blood volume by approximately 25%.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4957966
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49579662016-08-03 Comparative Evaluation of Crystalloid Resuscitation Rate in a Human Model of Compensated Haemorrhagic Shock Ho, Loretta Lau, Lawrence Churilov, Leonid Riedel, Bernhard McNicol, Larry Hahn, Robert G. Weinberg, Laurence Shock Clinical Science Aspects INTRODUCTION: The most effective rate of fluid resuscitation in haemorrhagic shock is unknown. METHODS: We performed a randomized crossover pilot study in a healthy volunteer model of compensated haemorrhagic shock. Following venesection of 15 mL/kg of blood, participants were randomized to 20 mL/kg of crystalloid over 10 min (FAST treatment) or 30 min (SLOW treatment). The primary end point was oxygen delivery (DO(2)). Secondary end points included pressure and flow-based haemodynamic variables, blood volume expansion, and clinical biochemistry. RESULTS: Nine normotensive healthy adult volunteers participated. No significant differences were observed in DO(2) and biochemical variables between the SLOW and FAST groups. Blood volume was reduced by 16% following venesection, with a corresponding 5% reduction in cardiac index (CI) (P < 0.001). Immediately following resuscitation the increase in blood volume corresponded to 54% of the infused volume under FAST treatment and 69% of the infused volume under SLOW treatment (P = 0.03). This blood volume expansion attenuated with time to 24% and 25% of the infused volume 30 min postinfusion. During fluid resuscitation, blood pressure was higher under FAST treatment. However, CI paradoxically decreased in most participants during the resuscitation phase; a finding not observed under SLOW treatment. CONCLUSION: FAST or SLOW fluid resuscitation had no significant impact on DO(2) between treatment groups. In both groups, changes in CI and blood pressure did not reflect the magnitude of intravascular blood volume deficit. Crystalloid resuscitation expanded intravascular blood volume by approximately 25%. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2016-08 2016-07-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4957966/ /pubmed/26974423 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SHK.0000000000000610 Text en Copyright © 2016 by the Shock Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0, where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
spellingShingle Clinical Science Aspects
Ho, Loretta
Lau, Lawrence
Churilov, Leonid
Riedel, Bernhard
McNicol, Larry
Hahn, Robert G.
Weinberg, Laurence
Comparative Evaluation of Crystalloid Resuscitation Rate in a Human Model of Compensated Haemorrhagic Shock
title Comparative Evaluation of Crystalloid Resuscitation Rate in a Human Model of Compensated Haemorrhagic Shock
title_full Comparative Evaluation of Crystalloid Resuscitation Rate in a Human Model of Compensated Haemorrhagic Shock
title_fullStr Comparative Evaluation of Crystalloid Resuscitation Rate in a Human Model of Compensated Haemorrhagic Shock
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Evaluation of Crystalloid Resuscitation Rate in a Human Model of Compensated Haemorrhagic Shock
title_short Comparative Evaluation of Crystalloid Resuscitation Rate in a Human Model of Compensated Haemorrhagic Shock
title_sort comparative evaluation of crystalloid resuscitation rate in a human model of compensated haemorrhagic shock
topic Clinical Science Aspects
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4957966/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26974423
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SHK.0000000000000610
work_keys_str_mv AT holoretta comparativeevaluationofcrystalloidresuscitationrateinahumanmodelofcompensatedhaemorrhagicshock
AT laulawrence comparativeevaluationofcrystalloidresuscitationrateinahumanmodelofcompensatedhaemorrhagicshock
AT churilovleonid comparativeevaluationofcrystalloidresuscitationrateinahumanmodelofcompensatedhaemorrhagicshock
AT riedelbernhard comparativeevaluationofcrystalloidresuscitationrateinahumanmodelofcompensatedhaemorrhagicshock
AT mcnicollarry comparativeevaluationofcrystalloidresuscitationrateinahumanmodelofcompensatedhaemorrhagicshock
AT hahnrobertg comparativeevaluationofcrystalloidresuscitationrateinahumanmodelofcompensatedhaemorrhagicshock
AT weinberglaurence comparativeevaluationofcrystalloidresuscitationrateinahumanmodelofcompensatedhaemorrhagicshock