Cargando…

Aerosol delivery with two ventilation modes during mechanical ventilation: a randomized study

BACKGROUND: Volume-controlled ventilation has been suggested to optimize lung deposition during nebulization although promoting spontaneous ventilation is targeted to avoid ventilator-induced diaphragmatic dysfunction. Comparing topographic aerosol lung deposition during volume-controlled ventilatio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dugernier, Jonathan, Reychler, Gregory, Wittebole, Xavier, Roeseler, Jean, Depoortere, Virginie, Sottiaux, Thierry, Michotte, Jean-Bernard, Vanbever, Rita, Dugernier, Thierry, Goffette, Pierre, Docquier, Marie-Agnes, Raftopoulos, Christian, Hantson, Philippe, Jamar, François, Laterre, Pierre-François
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Paris 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4958090/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27447788
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-016-0169-x
_version_ 1782444267060330496
author Dugernier, Jonathan
Reychler, Gregory
Wittebole, Xavier
Roeseler, Jean
Depoortere, Virginie
Sottiaux, Thierry
Michotte, Jean-Bernard
Vanbever, Rita
Dugernier, Thierry
Goffette, Pierre
Docquier, Marie-Agnes
Raftopoulos, Christian
Hantson, Philippe
Jamar, François
Laterre, Pierre-François
author_facet Dugernier, Jonathan
Reychler, Gregory
Wittebole, Xavier
Roeseler, Jean
Depoortere, Virginie
Sottiaux, Thierry
Michotte, Jean-Bernard
Vanbever, Rita
Dugernier, Thierry
Goffette, Pierre
Docquier, Marie-Agnes
Raftopoulos, Christian
Hantson, Philippe
Jamar, François
Laterre, Pierre-François
author_sort Dugernier, Jonathan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Volume-controlled ventilation has been suggested to optimize lung deposition during nebulization although promoting spontaneous ventilation is targeted to avoid ventilator-induced diaphragmatic dysfunction. Comparing topographic aerosol lung deposition during volume-controlled ventilation and spontaneous ventilation in pressure support has never been performed. The aim of this study was to compare lung deposition of a radiolabeled aerosol generated with a vibrating-mesh nebulizer during invasive mechanical ventilation, with two modes: pressure support ventilation and volume-controlled ventilation. METHODS: Seventeen postoperative neurosurgery patients without pulmonary disease were randomly ventilated in pressure support or volume-controlled ventilation. Diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid labeled with technetium-99m (2 mCi/3 mL) was administrated using a vibrating-mesh nebulizer (Aerogen Solo(®), provided by Aerogen Ltd, Galway, Ireland) connected to the endotracheal tube. Pulmonary and extrapulmonary particles deposition was analyzed using planar scintigraphy. RESULTS: Lung deposition was 10.5 ± 3.0 and 15.1 ± 5.0 % of the nominal dose during pressure support and volume-controlled ventilation, respectively (p < 0.05). Higher endotracheal tube and tracheal deposition was observed during pressure support ventilation (27.4 ± 6.6 vs. 20.7 ± 6.0 %, p < 0.05). A similar penetration index was observed for the right (p = 0.210) and the left lung (p = 0.211) with both ventilation modes. A high intersubject variability of lung deposition was observed with both modes regarding lung doses, aerosol penetration and distribution between the right and the left lung. CONCLUSIONS: In the specific conditions of the study, volume-controlled ventilation was associated with higher lung deposition of nebulized particles as compared to pressure support ventilation. The clinical benefit of this effect warrants further studies. Clinical trial registration NCT01879488 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13613-016-0169-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4958090
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer Paris
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49580902016-08-01 Aerosol delivery with two ventilation modes during mechanical ventilation: a randomized study Dugernier, Jonathan Reychler, Gregory Wittebole, Xavier Roeseler, Jean Depoortere, Virginie Sottiaux, Thierry Michotte, Jean-Bernard Vanbever, Rita Dugernier, Thierry Goffette, Pierre Docquier, Marie-Agnes Raftopoulos, Christian Hantson, Philippe Jamar, François Laterre, Pierre-François Ann Intensive Care Research BACKGROUND: Volume-controlled ventilation has been suggested to optimize lung deposition during nebulization although promoting spontaneous ventilation is targeted to avoid ventilator-induced diaphragmatic dysfunction. Comparing topographic aerosol lung deposition during volume-controlled ventilation and spontaneous ventilation in pressure support has never been performed. The aim of this study was to compare lung deposition of a radiolabeled aerosol generated with a vibrating-mesh nebulizer during invasive mechanical ventilation, with two modes: pressure support ventilation and volume-controlled ventilation. METHODS: Seventeen postoperative neurosurgery patients without pulmonary disease were randomly ventilated in pressure support or volume-controlled ventilation. Diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid labeled with technetium-99m (2 mCi/3 mL) was administrated using a vibrating-mesh nebulizer (Aerogen Solo(®), provided by Aerogen Ltd, Galway, Ireland) connected to the endotracheal tube. Pulmonary and extrapulmonary particles deposition was analyzed using planar scintigraphy. RESULTS: Lung deposition was 10.5 ± 3.0 and 15.1 ± 5.0 % of the nominal dose during pressure support and volume-controlled ventilation, respectively (p < 0.05). Higher endotracheal tube and tracheal deposition was observed during pressure support ventilation (27.4 ± 6.6 vs. 20.7 ± 6.0 %, p < 0.05). A similar penetration index was observed for the right (p = 0.210) and the left lung (p = 0.211) with both ventilation modes. A high intersubject variability of lung deposition was observed with both modes regarding lung doses, aerosol penetration and distribution between the right and the left lung. CONCLUSIONS: In the specific conditions of the study, volume-controlled ventilation was associated with higher lung deposition of nebulized particles as compared to pressure support ventilation. The clinical benefit of this effect warrants further studies. Clinical trial registration NCT01879488 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13613-016-0169-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Paris 2016-07-22 /pmc/articles/PMC4958090/ /pubmed/27447788 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-016-0169-x Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research
Dugernier, Jonathan
Reychler, Gregory
Wittebole, Xavier
Roeseler, Jean
Depoortere, Virginie
Sottiaux, Thierry
Michotte, Jean-Bernard
Vanbever, Rita
Dugernier, Thierry
Goffette, Pierre
Docquier, Marie-Agnes
Raftopoulos, Christian
Hantson, Philippe
Jamar, François
Laterre, Pierre-François
Aerosol delivery with two ventilation modes during mechanical ventilation: a randomized study
title Aerosol delivery with two ventilation modes during mechanical ventilation: a randomized study
title_full Aerosol delivery with two ventilation modes during mechanical ventilation: a randomized study
title_fullStr Aerosol delivery with two ventilation modes during mechanical ventilation: a randomized study
title_full_unstemmed Aerosol delivery with two ventilation modes during mechanical ventilation: a randomized study
title_short Aerosol delivery with two ventilation modes during mechanical ventilation: a randomized study
title_sort aerosol delivery with two ventilation modes during mechanical ventilation: a randomized study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4958090/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27447788
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-016-0169-x
work_keys_str_mv AT dugernierjonathan aerosoldeliverywithtwoventilationmodesduringmechanicalventilationarandomizedstudy
AT reychlergregory aerosoldeliverywithtwoventilationmodesduringmechanicalventilationarandomizedstudy
AT wittebolexavier aerosoldeliverywithtwoventilationmodesduringmechanicalventilationarandomizedstudy
AT roeselerjean aerosoldeliverywithtwoventilationmodesduringmechanicalventilationarandomizedstudy
AT depoorterevirginie aerosoldeliverywithtwoventilationmodesduringmechanicalventilationarandomizedstudy
AT sottiauxthierry aerosoldeliverywithtwoventilationmodesduringmechanicalventilationarandomizedstudy
AT michottejeanbernard aerosoldeliverywithtwoventilationmodesduringmechanicalventilationarandomizedstudy
AT vanbeverrita aerosoldeliverywithtwoventilationmodesduringmechanicalventilationarandomizedstudy
AT dugernierthierry aerosoldeliverywithtwoventilationmodesduringmechanicalventilationarandomizedstudy
AT goffettepierre aerosoldeliverywithtwoventilationmodesduringmechanicalventilationarandomizedstudy
AT docquiermarieagnes aerosoldeliverywithtwoventilationmodesduringmechanicalventilationarandomizedstudy
AT raftopouloschristian aerosoldeliverywithtwoventilationmodesduringmechanicalventilationarandomizedstudy
AT hantsonphilippe aerosoldeliverywithtwoventilationmodesduringmechanicalventilationarandomizedstudy
AT jamarfrancois aerosoldeliverywithtwoventilationmodesduringmechanicalventilationarandomizedstudy
AT laterrepierrefrancois aerosoldeliverywithtwoventilationmodesduringmechanicalventilationarandomizedstudy