Cargando…
Aerosol delivery with two ventilation modes during mechanical ventilation: a randomized study
BACKGROUND: Volume-controlled ventilation has been suggested to optimize lung deposition during nebulization although promoting spontaneous ventilation is targeted to avoid ventilator-induced diaphragmatic dysfunction. Comparing topographic aerosol lung deposition during volume-controlled ventilatio...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Paris
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4958090/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27447788 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-016-0169-x |
_version_ | 1782444267060330496 |
---|---|
author | Dugernier, Jonathan Reychler, Gregory Wittebole, Xavier Roeseler, Jean Depoortere, Virginie Sottiaux, Thierry Michotte, Jean-Bernard Vanbever, Rita Dugernier, Thierry Goffette, Pierre Docquier, Marie-Agnes Raftopoulos, Christian Hantson, Philippe Jamar, François Laterre, Pierre-François |
author_facet | Dugernier, Jonathan Reychler, Gregory Wittebole, Xavier Roeseler, Jean Depoortere, Virginie Sottiaux, Thierry Michotte, Jean-Bernard Vanbever, Rita Dugernier, Thierry Goffette, Pierre Docquier, Marie-Agnes Raftopoulos, Christian Hantson, Philippe Jamar, François Laterre, Pierre-François |
author_sort | Dugernier, Jonathan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Volume-controlled ventilation has been suggested to optimize lung deposition during nebulization although promoting spontaneous ventilation is targeted to avoid ventilator-induced diaphragmatic dysfunction. Comparing topographic aerosol lung deposition during volume-controlled ventilation and spontaneous ventilation in pressure support has never been performed. The aim of this study was to compare lung deposition of a radiolabeled aerosol generated with a vibrating-mesh nebulizer during invasive mechanical ventilation, with two modes: pressure support ventilation and volume-controlled ventilation. METHODS: Seventeen postoperative neurosurgery patients without pulmonary disease were randomly ventilated in pressure support or volume-controlled ventilation. Diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid labeled with technetium-99m (2 mCi/3 mL) was administrated using a vibrating-mesh nebulizer (Aerogen Solo(®), provided by Aerogen Ltd, Galway, Ireland) connected to the endotracheal tube. Pulmonary and extrapulmonary particles deposition was analyzed using planar scintigraphy. RESULTS: Lung deposition was 10.5 ± 3.0 and 15.1 ± 5.0 % of the nominal dose during pressure support and volume-controlled ventilation, respectively (p < 0.05). Higher endotracheal tube and tracheal deposition was observed during pressure support ventilation (27.4 ± 6.6 vs. 20.7 ± 6.0 %, p < 0.05). A similar penetration index was observed for the right (p = 0.210) and the left lung (p = 0.211) with both ventilation modes. A high intersubject variability of lung deposition was observed with both modes regarding lung doses, aerosol penetration and distribution between the right and the left lung. CONCLUSIONS: In the specific conditions of the study, volume-controlled ventilation was associated with higher lung deposition of nebulized particles as compared to pressure support ventilation. The clinical benefit of this effect warrants further studies. Clinical trial registration NCT01879488 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13613-016-0169-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4958090 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Springer Paris |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49580902016-08-01 Aerosol delivery with two ventilation modes during mechanical ventilation: a randomized study Dugernier, Jonathan Reychler, Gregory Wittebole, Xavier Roeseler, Jean Depoortere, Virginie Sottiaux, Thierry Michotte, Jean-Bernard Vanbever, Rita Dugernier, Thierry Goffette, Pierre Docquier, Marie-Agnes Raftopoulos, Christian Hantson, Philippe Jamar, François Laterre, Pierre-François Ann Intensive Care Research BACKGROUND: Volume-controlled ventilation has been suggested to optimize lung deposition during nebulization although promoting spontaneous ventilation is targeted to avoid ventilator-induced diaphragmatic dysfunction. Comparing topographic aerosol lung deposition during volume-controlled ventilation and spontaneous ventilation in pressure support has never been performed. The aim of this study was to compare lung deposition of a radiolabeled aerosol generated with a vibrating-mesh nebulizer during invasive mechanical ventilation, with two modes: pressure support ventilation and volume-controlled ventilation. METHODS: Seventeen postoperative neurosurgery patients without pulmonary disease were randomly ventilated in pressure support or volume-controlled ventilation. Diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid labeled with technetium-99m (2 mCi/3 mL) was administrated using a vibrating-mesh nebulizer (Aerogen Solo(®), provided by Aerogen Ltd, Galway, Ireland) connected to the endotracheal tube. Pulmonary and extrapulmonary particles deposition was analyzed using planar scintigraphy. RESULTS: Lung deposition was 10.5 ± 3.0 and 15.1 ± 5.0 % of the nominal dose during pressure support and volume-controlled ventilation, respectively (p < 0.05). Higher endotracheal tube and tracheal deposition was observed during pressure support ventilation (27.4 ± 6.6 vs. 20.7 ± 6.0 %, p < 0.05). A similar penetration index was observed for the right (p = 0.210) and the left lung (p = 0.211) with both ventilation modes. A high intersubject variability of lung deposition was observed with both modes regarding lung doses, aerosol penetration and distribution between the right and the left lung. CONCLUSIONS: In the specific conditions of the study, volume-controlled ventilation was associated with higher lung deposition of nebulized particles as compared to pressure support ventilation. The clinical benefit of this effect warrants further studies. Clinical trial registration NCT01879488 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13613-016-0169-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Paris 2016-07-22 /pmc/articles/PMC4958090/ /pubmed/27447788 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-016-0169-x Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Research Dugernier, Jonathan Reychler, Gregory Wittebole, Xavier Roeseler, Jean Depoortere, Virginie Sottiaux, Thierry Michotte, Jean-Bernard Vanbever, Rita Dugernier, Thierry Goffette, Pierre Docquier, Marie-Agnes Raftopoulos, Christian Hantson, Philippe Jamar, François Laterre, Pierre-François Aerosol delivery with two ventilation modes during mechanical ventilation: a randomized study |
title | Aerosol delivery with two ventilation modes during mechanical ventilation: a randomized study |
title_full | Aerosol delivery with two ventilation modes during mechanical ventilation: a randomized study |
title_fullStr | Aerosol delivery with two ventilation modes during mechanical ventilation: a randomized study |
title_full_unstemmed | Aerosol delivery with two ventilation modes during mechanical ventilation: a randomized study |
title_short | Aerosol delivery with two ventilation modes during mechanical ventilation: a randomized study |
title_sort | aerosol delivery with two ventilation modes during mechanical ventilation: a randomized study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4958090/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27447788 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-016-0169-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dugernierjonathan aerosoldeliverywithtwoventilationmodesduringmechanicalventilationarandomizedstudy AT reychlergregory aerosoldeliverywithtwoventilationmodesduringmechanicalventilationarandomizedstudy AT wittebolexavier aerosoldeliverywithtwoventilationmodesduringmechanicalventilationarandomizedstudy AT roeselerjean aerosoldeliverywithtwoventilationmodesduringmechanicalventilationarandomizedstudy AT depoorterevirginie aerosoldeliverywithtwoventilationmodesduringmechanicalventilationarandomizedstudy AT sottiauxthierry aerosoldeliverywithtwoventilationmodesduringmechanicalventilationarandomizedstudy AT michottejeanbernard aerosoldeliverywithtwoventilationmodesduringmechanicalventilationarandomizedstudy AT vanbeverrita aerosoldeliverywithtwoventilationmodesduringmechanicalventilationarandomizedstudy AT dugernierthierry aerosoldeliverywithtwoventilationmodesduringmechanicalventilationarandomizedstudy AT goffettepierre aerosoldeliverywithtwoventilationmodesduringmechanicalventilationarandomizedstudy AT docquiermarieagnes aerosoldeliverywithtwoventilationmodesduringmechanicalventilationarandomizedstudy AT raftopouloschristian aerosoldeliverywithtwoventilationmodesduringmechanicalventilationarandomizedstudy AT hantsonphilippe aerosoldeliverywithtwoventilationmodesduringmechanicalventilationarandomizedstudy AT jamarfrancois aerosoldeliverywithtwoventilationmodesduringmechanicalventilationarandomizedstudy AT laterrepierrefrancois aerosoldeliverywithtwoventilationmodesduringmechanicalventilationarandomizedstudy |