Cargando…
MRI-based assessment of the pineal gland in a large population of children aged 0–5 years and comparison with pineoblastoma: part I, the solid gland
INTRODUCTION: Differentiation between normal solid (non-cystic) pineal glands and pineal pathologies on brain MRI is difficult. The aim of this study was to assess the size of the solid pineal gland in children (0–5 years) and compare the findings with published pineoblastoma cases. METHODS: We retr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4958126/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27130616 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00234-016-1684-z |
_version_ | 1782444273115856896 |
---|---|
author | Galluzzi, Paolo de Jong, Marcus C. Sirin, Selma Maeder, Philippe Piu, Pietro Cerase, Alfonso Monti, Lucia Brisse, Hervé J. Castelijns, Jonas A. de Graaf, Pim Goericke, Sophia L. |
author_facet | Galluzzi, Paolo de Jong, Marcus C. Sirin, Selma Maeder, Philippe Piu, Pietro Cerase, Alfonso Monti, Lucia Brisse, Hervé J. Castelijns, Jonas A. de Graaf, Pim Goericke, Sophia L. |
author_sort | Galluzzi, Paolo |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Differentiation between normal solid (non-cystic) pineal glands and pineal pathologies on brain MRI is difficult. The aim of this study was to assess the size of the solid pineal gland in children (0–5 years) and compare the findings with published pineoblastoma cases. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the size (width, height, planimetric area) of solid pineal glands in 184 non-retinoblastoma patients (73 female, 111 male) aged 0–5 years on MRI. The effect of age and gender on gland size was evaluated. Linear regression analysis was performed to analyze the relation between size and age. Ninety-nine percent prediction intervals around the mean were added to construct a normal size range per age, with the upper bound of the predictive interval as the parameter of interest as a cutoff for normalcy. RESULTS: There was no significant interaction of gender and age for all the three pineal gland parameters (width, height, and area). Linear regression analysis gave 99 % upper prediction bounds of 7.9, 4.8, and 25.4 mm(2), respectively, for width, height, and area. The slopes (size increase per month) of each parameter were 0.046, 0.023, and 0.202, respectively. Ninety-three percent (95 % CI 66–100 %) of asymptomatic solid pineoblastomas were larger in size than the 99 % upper bound. CONCLUSION: This study establishes norms for solid pineal gland size in non-retinoblastoma children aged 0–5 years. Knowledge of the size of the normal pineal gland is helpful for detection of pineal gland abnormalities, particularly pineoblastoma. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00234-016-1684-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4958126 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49581262016-08-01 MRI-based assessment of the pineal gland in a large population of children aged 0–5 years and comparison with pineoblastoma: part I, the solid gland Galluzzi, Paolo de Jong, Marcus C. Sirin, Selma Maeder, Philippe Piu, Pietro Cerase, Alfonso Monti, Lucia Brisse, Hervé J. Castelijns, Jonas A. de Graaf, Pim Goericke, Sophia L. Neuroradiology Paediatric Neuroradiology INTRODUCTION: Differentiation between normal solid (non-cystic) pineal glands and pineal pathologies on brain MRI is difficult. The aim of this study was to assess the size of the solid pineal gland in children (0–5 years) and compare the findings with published pineoblastoma cases. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the size (width, height, planimetric area) of solid pineal glands in 184 non-retinoblastoma patients (73 female, 111 male) aged 0–5 years on MRI. The effect of age and gender on gland size was evaluated. Linear regression analysis was performed to analyze the relation between size and age. Ninety-nine percent prediction intervals around the mean were added to construct a normal size range per age, with the upper bound of the predictive interval as the parameter of interest as a cutoff for normalcy. RESULTS: There was no significant interaction of gender and age for all the three pineal gland parameters (width, height, and area). Linear regression analysis gave 99 % upper prediction bounds of 7.9, 4.8, and 25.4 mm(2), respectively, for width, height, and area. The slopes (size increase per month) of each parameter were 0.046, 0.023, and 0.202, respectively. Ninety-three percent (95 % CI 66–100 %) of asymptomatic solid pineoblastomas were larger in size than the 99 % upper bound. CONCLUSION: This study establishes norms for solid pineal gland size in non-retinoblastoma children aged 0–5 years. Knowledge of the size of the normal pineal gland is helpful for detection of pineal gland abnormalities, particularly pineoblastoma. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00234-016-1684-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016-04-29 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4958126/ /pubmed/27130616 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00234-016-1684-z Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Paediatric Neuroradiology Galluzzi, Paolo de Jong, Marcus C. Sirin, Selma Maeder, Philippe Piu, Pietro Cerase, Alfonso Monti, Lucia Brisse, Hervé J. Castelijns, Jonas A. de Graaf, Pim Goericke, Sophia L. MRI-based assessment of the pineal gland in a large population of children aged 0–5 years and comparison with pineoblastoma: part I, the solid gland |
title | MRI-based assessment of the pineal gland in a large population of children aged 0–5 years and comparison with pineoblastoma: part I, the solid gland |
title_full | MRI-based assessment of the pineal gland in a large population of children aged 0–5 years and comparison with pineoblastoma: part I, the solid gland |
title_fullStr | MRI-based assessment of the pineal gland in a large population of children aged 0–5 years and comparison with pineoblastoma: part I, the solid gland |
title_full_unstemmed | MRI-based assessment of the pineal gland in a large population of children aged 0–5 years and comparison with pineoblastoma: part I, the solid gland |
title_short | MRI-based assessment of the pineal gland in a large population of children aged 0–5 years and comparison with pineoblastoma: part I, the solid gland |
title_sort | mri-based assessment of the pineal gland in a large population of children aged 0–5 years and comparison with pineoblastoma: part i, the solid gland |
topic | Paediatric Neuroradiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4958126/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27130616 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00234-016-1684-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT galluzzipaolo mribasedassessmentofthepinealglandinalargepopulationofchildrenaged05yearsandcomparisonwithpineoblastomapartithesolidgland AT dejongmarcusc mribasedassessmentofthepinealglandinalargepopulationofchildrenaged05yearsandcomparisonwithpineoblastomapartithesolidgland AT sirinselma mribasedassessmentofthepinealglandinalargepopulationofchildrenaged05yearsandcomparisonwithpineoblastomapartithesolidgland AT maederphilippe mribasedassessmentofthepinealglandinalargepopulationofchildrenaged05yearsandcomparisonwithpineoblastomapartithesolidgland AT piupietro mribasedassessmentofthepinealglandinalargepopulationofchildrenaged05yearsandcomparisonwithpineoblastomapartithesolidgland AT cerasealfonso mribasedassessmentofthepinealglandinalargepopulationofchildrenaged05yearsandcomparisonwithpineoblastomapartithesolidgland AT montilucia mribasedassessmentofthepinealglandinalargepopulationofchildrenaged05yearsandcomparisonwithpineoblastomapartithesolidgland AT brissehervej mribasedassessmentofthepinealglandinalargepopulationofchildrenaged05yearsandcomparisonwithpineoblastomapartithesolidgland AT castelijnsjonasa mribasedassessmentofthepinealglandinalargepopulationofchildrenaged05yearsandcomparisonwithpineoblastomapartithesolidgland AT degraafpim mribasedassessmentofthepinealglandinalargepopulationofchildrenaged05yearsandcomparisonwithpineoblastomapartithesolidgland AT goerickesophial mribasedassessmentofthepinealglandinalargepopulationofchildrenaged05yearsandcomparisonwithpineoblastomapartithesolidgland AT mribasedassessmentofthepinealglandinalargepopulationofchildrenaged05yearsandcomparisonwithpineoblastomapartithesolidgland |