Cargando…

MRI-based assessment of the pineal gland in a large population of children aged 0–5 years and comparison with pineoblastoma: part I, the solid gland

INTRODUCTION: Differentiation between normal solid (non-cystic) pineal glands and pineal pathologies on brain MRI is difficult. The aim of this study was to assess the size of the solid pineal gland in children (0–5 years) and compare the findings with published pineoblastoma cases. METHODS: We retr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Galluzzi, Paolo, de Jong, Marcus C., Sirin, Selma, Maeder, Philippe, Piu, Pietro, Cerase, Alfonso, Monti, Lucia, Brisse, Hervé J., Castelijns, Jonas A., de Graaf, Pim, Goericke, Sophia L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4958126/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27130616
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00234-016-1684-z
_version_ 1782444273115856896
author Galluzzi, Paolo
de Jong, Marcus C.
Sirin, Selma
Maeder, Philippe
Piu, Pietro
Cerase, Alfonso
Monti, Lucia
Brisse, Hervé J.
Castelijns, Jonas A.
de Graaf, Pim
Goericke, Sophia L.
author_facet Galluzzi, Paolo
de Jong, Marcus C.
Sirin, Selma
Maeder, Philippe
Piu, Pietro
Cerase, Alfonso
Monti, Lucia
Brisse, Hervé J.
Castelijns, Jonas A.
de Graaf, Pim
Goericke, Sophia L.
author_sort Galluzzi, Paolo
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Differentiation between normal solid (non-cystic) pineal glands and pineal pathologies on brain MRI is difficult. The aim of this study was to assess the size of the solid pineal gland in children (0–5 years) and compare the findings with published pineoblastoma cases. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the size (width, height, planimetric area) of solid pineal glands in 184 non-retinoblastoma patients (73 female, 111 male) aged 0–5 years on MRI. The effect of age and gender on gland size was evaluated. Linear regression analysis was performed to analyze the relation between size and age. Ninety-nine percent prediction intervals around the mean were added to construct a normal size range per age, with the upper bound of the predictive interval as the parameter of interest as a cutoff for normalcy. RESULTS: There was no significant interaction of gender and age for all the three pineal gland parameters (width, height, and area). Linear regression analysis gave 99 % upper prediction bounds of 7.9, 4.8, and 25.4 mm(2), respectively, for width, height, and area. The slopes (size increase per month) of each parameter were 0.046, 0.023, and 0.202, respectively. Ninety-three percent (95 % CI 66–100 %) of asymptomatic solid pineoblastomas were larger in size than the 99 % upper bound. CONCLUSION: This study establishes norms for solid pineal gland size in non-retinoblastoma children aged 0–5 years. Knowledge of the size of the normal pineal gland is helpful for detection of pineal gland abnormalities, particularly pineoblastoma. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00234-016-1684-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4958126
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49581262016-08-01 MRI-based assessment of the pineal gland in a large population of children aged 0–5 years and comparison with pineoblastoma: part I, the solid gland Galluzzi, Paolo de Jong, Marcus C. Sirin, Selma Maeder, Philippe Piu, Pietro Cerase, Alfonso Monti, Lucia Brisse, Hervé J. Castelijns, Jonas A. de Graaf, Pim Goericke, Sophia L. Neuroradiology Paediatric Neuroradiology INTRODUCTION: Differentiation between normal solid (non-cystic) pineal glands and pineal pathologies on brain MRI is difficult. The aim of this study was to assess the size of the solid pineal gland in children (0–5 years) and compare the findings with published pineoblastoma cases. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the size (width, height, planimetric area) of solid pineal glands in 184 non-retinoblastoma patients (73 female, 111 male) aged 0–5 years on MRI. The effect of age and gender on gland size was evaluated. Linear regression analysis was performed to analyze the relation between size and age. Ninety-nine percent prediction intervals around the mean were added to construct a normal size range per age, with the upper bound of the predictive interval as the parameter of interest as a cutoff for normalcy. RESULTS: There was no significant interaction of gender and age for all the three pineal gland parameters (width, height, and area). Linear regression analysis gave 99 % upper prediction bounds of 7.9, 4.8, and 25.4 mm(2), respectively, for width, height, and area. The slopes (size increase per month) of each parameter were 0.046, 0.023, and 0.202, respectively. Ninety-three percent (95 % CI 66–100 %) of asymptomatic solid pineoblastomas were larger in size than the 99 % upper bound. CONCLUSION: This study establishes norms for solid pineal gland size in non-retinoblastoma children aged 0–5 years. Knowledge of the size of the normal pineal gland is helpful for detection of pineal gland abnormalities, particularly pineoblastoma. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00234-016-1684-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016-04-29 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4958126/ /pubmed/27130616 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00234-016-1684-z Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Paediatric Neuroradiology
Galluzzi, Paolo
de Jong, Marcus C.
Sirin, Selma
Maeder, Philippe
Piu, Pietro
Cerase, Alfonso
Monti, Lucia
Brisse, Hervé J.
Castelijns, Jonas A.
de Graaf, Pim
Goericke, Sophia L.
MRI-based assessment of the pineal gland in a large population of children aged 0–5 years and comparison with pineoblastoma: part I, the solid gland
title MRI-based assessment of the pineal gland in a large population of children aged 0–5 years and comparison with pineoblastoma: part I, the solid gland
title_full MRI-based assessment of the pineal gland in a large population of children aged 0–5 years and comparison with pineoblastoma: part I, the solid gland
title_fullStr MRI-based assessment of the pineal gland in a large population of children aged 0–5 years and comparison with pineoblastoma: part I, the solid gland
title_full_unstemmed MRI-based assessment of the pineal gland in a large population of children aged 0–5 years and comparison with pineoblastoma: part I, the solid gland
title_short MRI-based assessment of the pineal gland in a large population of children aged 0–5 years and comparison with pineoblastoma: part I, the solid gland
title_sort mri-based assessment of the pineal gland in a large population of children aged 0–5 years and comparison with pineoblastoma: part i, the solid gland
topic Paediatric Neuroradiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4958126/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27130616
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00234-016-1684-z
work_keys_str_mv AT galluzzipaolo mribasedassessmentofthepinealglandinalargepopulationofchildrenaged05yearsandcomparisonwithpineoblastomapartithesolidgland
AT dejongmarcusc mribasedassessmentofthepinealglandinalargepopulationofchildrenaged05yearsandcomparisonwithpineoblastomapartithesolidgland
AT sirinselma mribasedassessmentofthepinealglandinalargepopulationofchildrenaged05yearsandcomparisonwithpineoblastomapartithesolidgland
AT maederphilippe mribasedassessmentofthepinealglandinalargepopulationofchildrenaged05yearsandcomparisonwithpineoblastomapartithesolidgland
AT piupietro mribasedassessmentofthepinealglandinalargepopulationofchildrenaged05yearsandcomparisonwithpineoblastomapartithesolidgland
AT cerasealfonso mribasedassessmentofthepinealglandinalargepopulationofchildrenaged05yearsandcomparisonwithpineoblastomapartithesolidgland
AT montilucia mribasedassessmentofthepinealglandinalargepopulationofchildrenaged05yearsandcomparisonwithpineoblastomapartithesolidgland
AT brissehervej mribasedassessmentofthepinealglandinalargepopulationofchildrenaged05yearsandcomparisonwithpineoblastomapartithesolidgland
AT castelijnsjonasa mribasedassessmentofthepinealglandinalargepopulationofchildrenaged05yearsandcomparisonwithpineoblastomapartithesolidgland
AT degraafpim mribasedassessmentofthepinealglandinalargepopulationofchildrenaged05yearsandcomparisonwithpineoblastomapartithesolidgland
AT goerickesophial mribasedassessmentofthepinealglandinalargepopulationofchildrenaged05yearsandcomparisonwithpineoblastomapartithesolidgland
AT mribasedassessmentofthepinealglandinalargepopulationofchildrenaged05yearsandcomparisonwithpineoblastomapartithesolidgland