Cargando…

A systematic review and meta-analysis of Harmonic technology compared with conventional techniques in mastectomy and breast-conserving surgery with lymphadenectomy for breast cancer

BACKGROUND: Mastectomy and breast-conserving surgery (BCS) are important treatment options for breast cancer patients. A previous meta-analysis demonstrated that the risk of certain complications can be reduced with the Harmonic technology compared with conventional methods in mastectomy. However, t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cheng, Hang, Clymer, Jeffrey W, Ferko, Nicole C, Patel, Leena, Soleas, Ireena M, Cameron, Chris G, Hinoul, Piet
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4958357/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27486342
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/BCTT.S110461
_version_ 1782444298540679168
author Cheng, Hang
Clymer, Jeffrey W
Ferko, Nicole C
Patel, Leena
Soleas, Ireena M
Cameron, Chris G
Hinoul, Piet
author_facet Cheng, Hang
Clymer, Jeffrey W
Ferko, Nicole C
Patel, Leena
Soleas, Ireena M
Cameron, Chris G
Hinoul, Piet
author_sort Cheng, Hang
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Mastectomy and breast-conserving surgery (BCS) are important treatment options for breast cancer patients. A previous meta-analysis demonstrated that the risk of certain complications can be reduced with the Harmonic technology compared with conventional methods in mastectomy. However, the meta-analysis did not include studies of BCS patients and focused on a subset of surgical complications. The objective of this study was to compare Harmonic technology and conventional techniques for a range of clinical outcomes and complications in both mastectomy and BCS patients, including axillary lymph node dissection. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was performed for randomized controlled trials comparing Harmonic technology and conventional methods in breast cancer surgery. Outcome measures included blood loss, drainage volume, total complications, seroma, necrosis, wound infections, ecchymosis, hematoma, hospital length of stay, and operating time. Risk of bias was analyzed for all studies. Meta-analysis was performed using random-effects models for mean differences of continuous variables and a fixed-effects model for risk ratios of dichotomous variables. RESULTS: Twelve studies met the inclusion criteria. Across surgery types, compared to conventional techniques, Harmonic technology reduced total complications by 52% (P=0.002), seroma by 46% (P<0.0001), necrosis by 49% (P=0.04), postoperative chest wall drainage by 46% (P=0.0005), blood loss by 38% (P=0.0005), and length of stay by 22% (P=0.007). Although benefits generally appeared greatest in mastectomy patients with lymph node dissection, Harmonic technology showed significant reductions in complications in the BCS study subgroup. CONCLUSION: In this meta-analysis of both mastectomy and BCS procedures, the use of Harmonic technology reduced the risk of most complications by about half across breast cancer surgery patients. These benefits may be due to superior hemostatic capabilities of Harmonic technology and better dissection, particularly lymph node dissection. Reduction in complications and other resource outcomes may engender lower downstream health care costs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4958357
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49583572016-08-02 A systematic review and meta-analysis of Harmonic technology compared with conventional techniques in mastectomy and breast-conserving surgery with lymphadenectomy for breast cancer Cheng, Hang Clymer, Jeffrey W Ferko, Nicole C Patel, Leena Soleas, Ireena M Cameron, Chris G Hinoul, Piet Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press) Review BACKGROUND: Mastectomy and breast-conserving surgery (BCS) are important treatment options for breast cancer patients. A previous meta-analysis demonstrated that the risk of certain complications can be reduced with the Harmonic technology compared with conventional methods in mastectomy. However, the meta-analysis did not include studies of BCS patients and focused on a subset of surgical complications. The objective of this study was to compare Harmonic technology and conventional techniques for a range of clinical outcomes and complications in both mastectomy and BCS patients, including axillary lymph node dissection. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was performed for randomized controlled trials comparing Harmonic technology and conventional methods in breast cancer surgery. Outcome measures included blood loss, drainage volume, total complications, seroma, necrosis, wound infections, ecchymosis, hematoma, hospital length of stay, and operating time. Risk of bias was analyzed for all studies. Meta-analysis was performed using random-effects models for mean differences of continuous variables and a fixed-effects model for risk ratios of dichotomous variables. RESULTS: Twelve studies met the inclusion criteria. Across surgery types, compared to conventional techniques, Harmonic technology reduced total complications by 52% (P=0.002), seroma by 46% (P<0.0001), necrosis by 49% (P=0.04), postoperative chest wall drainage by 46% (P=0.0005), blood loss by 38% (P=0.0005), and length of stay by 22% (P=0.007). Although benefits generally appeared greatest in mastectomy patients with lymph node dissection, Harmonic technology showed significant reductions in complications in the BCS study subgroup. CONCLUSION: In this meta-analysis of both mastectomy and BCS procedures, the use of Harmonic technology reduced the risk of most complications by about half across breast cancer surgery patients. These benefits may be due to superior hemostatic capabilities of Harmonic technology and better dissection, particularly lymph node dissection. Reduction in complications and other resource outcomes may engender lower downstream health care costs. Dove Medical Press 2016-07-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4958357/ /pubmed/27486342 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/BCTT.S110461 Text en © 2016 Cheng et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Review
Cheng, Hang
Clymer, Jeffrey W
Ferko, Nicole C
Patel, Leena
Soleas, Ireena M
Cameron, Chris G
Hinoul, Piet
A systematic review and meta-analysis of Harmonic technology compared with conventional techniques in mastectomy and breast-conserving surgery with lymphadenectomy for breast cancer
title A systematic review and meta-analysis of Harmonic technology compared with conventional techniques in mastectomy and breast-conserving surgery with lymphadenectomy for breast cancer
title_full A systematic review and meta-analysis of Harmonic technology compared with conventional techniques in mastectomy and breast-conserving surgery with lymphadenectomy for breast cancer
title_fullStr A systematic review and meta-analysis of Harmonic technology compared with conventional techniques in mastectomy and breast-conserving surgery with lymphadenectomy for breast cancer
title_full_unstemmed A systematic review and meta-analysis of Harmonic technology compared with conventional techniques in mastectomy and breast-conserving surgery with lymphadenectomy for breast cancer
title_short A systematic review and meta-analysis of Harmonic technology compared with conventional techniques in mastectomy and breast-conserving surgery with lymphadenectomy for breast cancer
title_sort systematic review and meta-analysis of harmonic technology compared with conventional techniques in mastectomy and breast-conserving surgery with lymphadenectomy for breast cancer
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4958357/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27486342
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/BCTT.S110461
work_keys_str_mv AT chenghang asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofharmonictechnologycomparedwithconventionaltechniquesinmastectomyandbreastconservingsurgerywithlymphadenectomyforbreastcancer
AT clymerjeffreyw asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofharmonictechnologycomparedwithconventionaltechniquesinmastectomyandbreastconservingsurgerywithlymphadenectomyforbreastcancer
AT ferkonicolec asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofharmonictechnologycomparedwithconventionaltechniquesinmastectomyandbreastconservingsurgerywithlymphadenectomyforbreastcancer
AT patelleena asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofharmonictechnologycomparedwithconventionaltechniquesinmastectomyandbreastconservingsurgerywithlymphadenectomyforbreastcancer
AT soleasireenam asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofharmonictechnologycomparedwithconventionaltechniquesinmastectomyandbreastconservingsurgerywithlymphadenectomyforbreastcancer
AT cameronchrisg asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofharmonictechnologycomparedwithconventionaltechniquesinmastectomyandbreastconservingsurgerywithlymphadenectomyforbreastcancer
AT hinoulpiet asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofharmonictechnologycomparedwithconventionaltechniquesinmastectomyandbreastconservingsurgerywithlymphadenectomyforbreastcancer
AT chenghang systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofharmonictechnologycomparedwithconventionaltechniquesinmastectomyandbreastconservingsurgerywithlymphadenectomyforbreastcancer
AT clymerjeffreyw systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofharmonictechnologycomparedwithconventionaltechniquesinmastectomyandbreastconservingsurgerywithlymphadenectomyforbreastcancer
AT ferkonicolec systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofharmonictechnologycomparedwithconventionaltechniquesinmastectomyandbreastconservingsurgerywithlymphadenectomyforbreastcancer
AT patelleena systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofharmonictechnologycomparedwithconventionaltechniquesinmastectomyandbreastconservingsurgerywithlymphadenectomyforbreastcancer
AT soleasireenam systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofharmonictechnologycomparedwithconventionaltechniquesinmastectomyandbreastconservingsurgerywithlymphadenectomyforbreastcancer
AT cameronchrisg systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofharmonictechnologycomparedwithconventionaltechniquesinmastectomyandbreastconservingsurgerywithlymphadenectomyforbreastcancer
AT hinoulpiet systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofharmonictechnologycomparedwithconventionaltechniquesinmastectomyandbreastconservingsurgerywithlymphadenectomyforbreastcancer