Cargando…
A systematic review and meta-analysis of Harmonic technology compared with conventional techniques in mastectomy and breast-conserving surgery with lymphadenectomy for breast cancer
BACKGROUND: Mastectomy and breast-conserving surgery (BCS) are important treatment options for breast cancer patients. A previous meta-analysis demonstrated that the risk of certain complications can be reduced with the Harmonic technology compared with conventional methods in mastectomy. However, t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4958357/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27486342 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/BCTT.S110461 |
_version_ | 1782444298540679168 |
---|---|
author | Cheng, Hang Clymer, Jeffrey W Ferko, Nicole C Patel, Leena Soleas, Ireena M Cameron, Chris G Hinoul, Piet |
author_facet | Cheng, Hang Clymer, Jeffrey W Ferko, Nicole C Patel, Leena Soleas, Ireena M Cameron, Chris G Hinoul, Piet |
author_sort | Cheng, Hang |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Mastectomy and breast-conserving surgery (BCS) are important treatment options for breast cancer patients. A previous meta-analysis demonstrated that the risk of certain complications can be reduced with the Harmonic technology compared with conventional methods in mastectomy. However, the meta-analysis did not include studies of BCS patients and focused on a subset of surgical complications. The objective of this study was to compare Harmonic technology and conventional techniques for a range of clinical outcomes and complications in both mastectomy and BCS patients, including axillary lymph node dissection. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was performed for randomized controlled trials comparing Harmonic technology and conventional methods in breast cancer surgery. Outcome measures included blood loss, drainage volume, total complications, seroma, necrosis, wound infections, ecchymosis, hematoma, hospital length of stay, and operating time. Risk of bias was analyzed for all studies. Meta-analysis was performed using random-effects models for mean differences of continuous variables and a fixed-effects model for risk ratios of dichotomous variables. RESULTS: Twelve studies met the inclusion criteria. Across surgery types, compared to conventional techniques, Harmonic technology reduced total complications by 52% (P=0.002), seroma by 46% (P<0.0001), necrosis by 49% (P=0.04), postoperative chest wall drainage by 46% (P=0.0005), blood loss by 38% (P=0.0005), and length of stay by 22% (P=0.007). Although benefits generally appeared greatest in mastectomy patients with lymph node dissection, Harmonic technology showed significant reductions in complications in the BCS study subgroup. CONCLUSION: In this meta-analysis of both mastectomy and BCS procedures, the use of Harmonic technology reduced the risk of most complications by about half across breast cancer surgery patients. These benefits may be due to superior hemostatic capabilities of Harmonic technology and better dissection, particularly lymph node dissection. Reduction in complications and other resource outcomes may engender lower downstream health care costs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4958357 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49583572016-08-02 A systematic review and meta-analysis of Harmonic technology compared with conventional techniques in mastectomy and breast-conserving surgery with lymphadenectomy for breast cancer Cheng, Hang Clymer, Jeffrey W Ferko, Nicole C Patel, Leena Soleas, Ireena M Cameron, Chris G Hinoul, Piet Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press) Review BACKGROUND: Mastectomy and breast-conserving surgery (BCS) are important treatment options for breast cancer patients. A previous meta-analysis demonstrated that the risk of certain complications can be reduced with the Harmonic technology compared with conventional methods in mastectomy. However, the meta-analysis did not include studies of BCS patients and focused on a subset of surgical complications. The objective of this study was to compare Harmonic technology and conventional techniques for a range of clinical outcomes and complications in both mastectomy and BCS patients, including axillary lymph node dissection. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was performed for randomized controlled trials comparing Harmonic technology and conventional methods in breast cancer surgery. Outcome measures included blood loss, drainage volume, total complications, seroma, necrosis, wound infections, ecchymosis, hematoma, hospital length of stay, and operating time. Risk of bias was analyzed for all studies. Meta-analysis was performed using random-effects models for mean differences of continuous variables and a fixed-effects model for risk ratios of dichotomous variables. RESULTS: Twelve studies met the inclusion criteria. Across surgery types, compared to conventional techniques, Harmonic technology reduced total complications by 52% (P=0.002), seroma by 46% (P<0.0001), necrosis by 49% (P=0.04), postoperative chest wall drainage by 46% (P=0.0005), blood loss by 38% (P=0.0005), and length of stay by 22% (P=0.007). Although benefits generally appeared greatest in mastectomy patients with lymph node dissection, Harmonic technology showed significant reductions in complications in the BCS study subgroup. CONCLUSION: In this meta-analysis of both mastectomy and BCS procedures, the use of Harmonic technology reduced the risk of most complications by about half across breast cancer surgery patients. These benefits may be due to superior hemostatic capabilities of Harmonic technology and better dissection, particularly lymph node dissection. Reduction in complications and other resource outcomes may engender lower downstream health care costs. Dove Medical Press 2016-07-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4958357/ /pubmed/27486342 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/BCTT.S110461 Text en © 2016 Cheng et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Review Cheng, Hang Clymer, Jeffrey W Ferko, Nicole C Patel, Leena Soleas, Ireena M Cameron, Chris G Hinoul, Piet A systematic review and meta-analysis of Harmonic technology compared with conventional techniques in mastectomy and breast-conserving surgery with lymphadenectomy for breast cancer |
title | A systematic review and meta-analysis of Harmonic technology compared with conventional techniques in mastectomy and breast-conserving surgery with lymphadenectomy for breast cancer |
title_full | A systematic review and meta-analysis of Harmonic technology compared with conventional techniques in mastectomy and breast-conserving surgery with lymphadenectomy for breast cancer |
title_fullStr | A systematic review and meta-analysis of Harmonic technology compared with conventional techniques in mastectomy and breast-conserving surgery with lymphadenectomy for breast cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | A systematic review and meta-analysis of Harmonic technology compared with conventional techniques in mastectomy and breast-conserving surgery with lymphadenectomy for breast cancer |
title_short | A systematic review and meta-analysis of Harmonic technology compared with conventional techniques in mastectomy and breast-conserving surgery with lymphadenectomy for breast cancer |
title_sort | systematic review and meta-analysis of harmonic technology compared with conventional techniques in mastectomy and breast-conserving surgery with lymphadenectomy for breast cancer |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4958357/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27486342 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/BCTT.S110461 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chenghang asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofharmonictechnologycomparedwithconventionaltechniquesinmastectomyandbreastconservingsurgerywithlymphadenectomyforbreastcancer AT clymerjeffreyw asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofharmonictechnologycomparedwithconventionaltechniquesinmastectomyandbreastconservingsurgerywithlymphadenectomyforbreastcancer AT ferkonicolec asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofharmonictechnologycomparedwithconventionaltechniquesinmastectomyandbreastconservingsurgerywithlymphadenectomyforbreastcancer AT patelleena asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofharmonictechnologycomparedwithconventionaltechniquesinmastectomyandbreastconservingsurgerywithlymphadenectomyforbreastcancer AT soleasireenam asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofharmonictechnologycomparedwithconventionaltechniquesinmastectomyandbreastconservingsurgerywithlymphadenectomyforbreastcancer AT cameronchrisg asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofharmonictechnologycomparedwithconventionaltechniquesinmastectomyandbreastconservingsurgerywithlymphadenectomyforbreastcancer AT hinoulpiet asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofharmonictechnologycomparedwithconventionaltechniquesinmastectomyandbreastconservingsurgerywithlymphadenectomyforbreastcancer AT chenghang systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofharmonictechnologycomparedwithconventionaltechniquesinmastectomyandbreastconservingsurgerywithlymphadenectomyforbreastcancer AT clymerjeffreyw systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofharmonictechnologycomparedwithconventionaltechniquesinmastectomyandbreastconservingsurgerywithlymphadenectomyforbreastcancer AT ferkonicolec systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofharmonictechnologycomparedwithconventionaltechniquesinmastectomyandbreastconservingsurgerywithlymphadenectomyforbreastcancer AT patelleena systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofharmonictechnologycomparedwithconventionaltechniquesinmastectomyandbreastconservingsurgerywithlymphadenectomyforbreastcancer AT soleasireenam systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofharmonictechnologycomparedwithconventionaltechniquesinmastectomyandbreastconservingsurgerywithlymphadenectomyforbreastcancer AT cameronchrisg systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofharmonictechnologycomparedwithconventionaltechniquesinmastectomyandbreastconservingsurgerywithlymphadenectomyforbreastcancer AT hinoulpiet systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofharmonictechnologycomparedwithconventionaltechniquesinmastectomyandbreastconservingsurgerywithlymphadenectomyforbreastcancer |