Cargando…

Comparative analysis of plastid genomes of non-photosynthetic Ericaceae and their photosynthetic relatives

Although plastid genomes of flowering plants are typically highly conserved regarding their size, gene content and order, there are some exceptions. Ericaceae, a large and diverse family of flowering plants, warrants special attention within the context of plastid genome evolution because it include...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Logacheva, Maria D., Schelkunov, Mikhail I., Shtratnikova, Victoria Y., Matveeva, Maria V., Penin, Aleksey A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4958920/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27452401
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep30042
_version_ 1782444340096794624
author Logacheva, Maria D.
Schelkunov, Mikhail I.
Shtratnikova, Victoria Y.
Matveeva, Maria V.
Penin, Aleksey A.
author_facet Logacheva, Maria D.
Schelkunov, Mikhail I.
Shtratnikova, Victoria Y.
Matveeva, Maria V.
Penin, Aleksey A.
author_sort Logacheva, Maria D.
collection PubMed
description Although plastid genomes of flowering plants are typically highly conserved regarding their size, gene content and order, there are some exceptions. Ericaceae, a large and diverse family of flowering plants, warrants special attention within the context of plastid genome evolution because it includes both non-photosynthetic and photosynthetic species with rearranged plastomes and putative losses of “essential” genes. We characterized plastid genomes of three species of Ericaceae, non-photosynthetic Monotropa uniflora and Hypopitys monotropa and photosynthetic Pyrola rotundifolia, using high-throughput sequencing. As expected for non-photosynthetic plants, M. uniflora and H. monotropa have small plastid genomes (46 kb and 35 kb, respectively) lacking genes related to photosynthesis, whereas P. rotundifolia has a larger genome (169 kb) with a gene set similar to other photosynthetic plants. The examined genomes contain an unusually high number of repeats and translocations. Comparative analysis of the expanded set of Ericaceae plastomes suggests that the genes clpP and accD that are present in the plastid genomes of almost all plants have not been lost in this family (as was previously thought) but rather persist in these genomes in unusual forms. Also we found a new gene in P. rotundifolia that emerged as a result of duplication of rps4 gene.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4958920
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49589202016-08-04 Comparative analysis of plastid genomes of non-photosynthetic Ericaceae and their photosynthetic relatives Logacheva, Maria D. Schelkunov, Mikhail I. Shtratnikova, Victoria Y. Matveeva, Maria V. Penin, Aleksey A. Sci Rep Article Although plastid genomes of flowering plants are typically highly conserved regarding their size, gene content and order, there are some exceptions. Ericaceae, a large and diverse family of flowering plants, warrants special attention within the context of plastid genome evolution because it includes both non-photosynthetic and photosynthetic species with rearranged plastomes and putative losses of “essential” genes. We characterized plastid genomes of three species of Ericaceae, non-photosynthetic Monotropa uniflora and Hypopitys monotropa and photosynthetic Pyrola rotundifolia, using high-throughput sequencing. As expected for non-photosynthetic plants, M. uniflora and H. monotropa have small plastid genomes (46 kb and 35 kb, respectively) lacking genes related to photosynthesis, whereas P. rotundifolia has a larger genome (169 kb) with a gene set similar to other photosynthetic plants. The examined genomes contain an unusually high number of repeats and translocations. Comparative analysis of the expanded set of Ericaceae plastomes suggests that the genes clpP and accD that are present in the plastid genomes of almost all plants have not been lost in this family (as was previously thought) but rather persist in these genomes in unusual forms. Also we found a new gene in P. rotundifolia that emerged as a result of duplication of rps4 gene. Nature Publishing Group 2016-07-25 /pmc/articles/PMC4958920/ /pubmed/27452401 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep30042 Text en Copyright © 2016, Macmillan Publishers Limited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Logacheva, Maria D.
Schelkunov, Mikhail I.
Shtratnikova, Victoria Y.
Matveeva, Maria V.
Penin, Aleksey A.
Comparative analysis of plastid genomes of non-photosynthetic Ericaceae and their photosynthetic relatives
title Comparative analysis of plastid genomes of non-photosynthetic Ericaceae and their photosynthetic relatives
title_full Comparative analysis of plastid genomes of non-photosynthetic Ericaceae and their photosynthetic relatives
title_fullStr Comparative analysis of plastid genomes of non-photosynthetic Ericaceae and their photosynthetic relatives
title_full_unstemmed Comparative analysis of plastid genomes of non-photosynthetic Ericaceae and their photosynthetic relatives
title_short Comparative analysis of plastid genomes of non-photosynthetic Ericaceae and their photosynthetic relatives
title_sort comparative analysis of plastid genomes of non-photosynthetic ericaceae and their photosynthetic relatives
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4958920/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27452401
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep30042
work_keys_str_mv AT logachevamariad comparativeanalysisofplastidgenomesofnonphotosyntheticericaceaeandtheirphotosyntheticrelatives
AT schelkunovmikhaili comparativeanalysisofplastidgenomesofnonphotosyntheticericaceaeandtheirphotosyntheticrelatives
AT shtratnikovavictoriay comparativeanalysisofplastidgenomesofnonphotosyntheticericaceaeandtheirphotosyntheticrelatives
AT matveevamariav comparativeanalysisofplastidgenomesofnonphotosyntheticericaceaeandtheirphotosyntheticrelatives
AT peninalekseya comparativeanalysisofplastidgenomesofnonphotosyntheticericaceaeandtheirphotosyntheticrelatives