Cargando…

Global Forum 2015 dialogue on “From evidence to policy – thinking outside the box”: perspectives to improve evidence uptake and good practices in the African Region

BACKGROUND: The Global Forum 2015 panel session dialogue entitled “From evidence to policy – thinking outside the box” was held on 26 August 2015 in the Philippines to debate why evidence was not fully translated into policy and practice and what could be done to increase its uptake. This paper repo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kirigia, Joses Muthuri, Pannenborg, Charles Ok, Amore, Luis Gabriel Cuervo, Ghannem, Hassen, IJsselmuiden, Carel, Nabyonga-Orem, Juliet
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4959371/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27453984
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1453-z
_version_ 1782444392854847488
author Kirigia, Joses Muthuri
Pannenborg, Charles Ok
Amore, Luis Gabriel Cuervo
Ghannem, Hassen
IJsselmuiden, Carel
Nabyonga-Orem, Juliet
author_facet Kirigia, Joses Muthuri
Pannenborg, Charles Ok
Amore, Luis Gabriel Cuervo
Ghannem, Hassen
IJsselmuiden, Carel
Nabyonga-Orem, Juliet
author_sort Kirigia, Joses Muthuri
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Global Forum 2015 panel session dialogue entitled “From evidence to policy – thinking outside the box” was held on 26 August 2015 in the Philippines to debate why evidence was not fully translated into policy and practice and what could be done to increase its uptake. This paper reports the reasons and possible actions for increasing the uptake of evidence, and highlights the actions partners could take to increase the use of evidence in the African Region. DISCUSSION: The Global Forum 2015 debate attributed African Region’s low uptake of evidence to the big gap in incentives and interests between research for health researchers and public health policy-makers; limited appreciation on the side of researchers that public health decisions are based on multiple and complex considerations; perception among users that research evidence is not relevant to local contexts; absence of knowledge translation platforms; sub-optimal collaboration and engagement between industry and research institutions; lack of involvement of civil society organizations; lack of engagement of communities in the research process; failure to engage the media; limited awareness and debate in national and local parliaments on the importance of investing in research and innovation; and dearth of research and innovation parks in the African Region. CONCLUSION: The actions needed in the Region to increase the uptake of evidence in policy and practice include strengthening NHRS governance; bridging the motivation gap between researchers and health policy-makers; restoring trust between researchers and decision-makers; ensuring close and continuous intellectual intercourse among researchers, ministry of health policy-makers and technocrats during the life course of research projects or programmes; proactive collaboration between academia and industry; regular briefings of civil society, media, relevant parliamentary committees and development partners; development of vibrant knowledge translation platforms; development of action plans for implementing research recommendations, preferably in the context of the Sustainable Development Goals; and encouragement of competition on NHRS strengthening and research output and uptake among the countries using a barometer or scorecard to review their performance at various regional ministerial forums and taking into account the lessons learned from the MDG period.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4959371
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49593712016-08-01 Global Forum 2015 dialogue on “From evidence to policy – thinking outside the box”: perspectives to improve evidence uptake and good practices in the African Region Kirigia, Joses Muthuri Pannenborg, Charles Ok Amore, Luis Gabriel Cuervo Ghannem, Hassen IJsselmuiden, Carel Nabyonga-Orem, Juliet BMC Health Serv Res Debate BACKGROUND: The Global Forum 2015 panel session dialogue entitled “From evidence to policy – thinking outside the box” was held on 26 August 2015 in the Philippines to debate why evidence was not fully translated into policy and practice and what could be done to increase its uptake. This paper reports the reasons and possible actions for increasing the uptake of evidence, and highlights the actions partners could take to increase the use of evidence in the African Region. DISCUSSION: The Global Forum 2015 debate attributed African Region’s low uptake of evidence to the big gap in incentives and interests between research for health researchers and public health policy-makers; limited appreciation on the side of researchers that public health decisions are based on multiple and complex considerations; perception among users that research evidence is not relevant to local contexts; absence of knowledge translation platforms; sub-optimal collaboration and engagement between industry and research institutions; lack of involvement of civil society organizations; lack of engagement of communities in the research process; failure to engage the media; limited awareness and debate in national and local parliaments on the importance of investing in research and innovation; and dearth of research and innovation parks in the African Region. CONCLUSION: The actions needed in the Region to increase the uptake of evidence in policy and practice include strengthening NHRS governance; bridging the motivation gap between researchers and health policy-makers; restoring trust between researchers and decision-makers; ensuring close and continuous intellectual intercourse among researchers, ministry of health policy-makers and technocrats during the life course of research projects or programmes; proactive collaboration between academia and industry; regular briefings of civil society, media, relevant parliamentary committees and development partners; development of vibrant knowledge translation platforms; development of action plans for implementing research recommendations, preferably in the context of the Sustainable Development Goals; and encouragement of competition on NHRS strengthening and research output and uptake among the countries using a barometer or scorecard to review their performance at various regional ministerial forums and taking into account the lessons learned from the MDG period. BioMed Central 2016-07-18 /pmc/articles/PMC4959371/ /pubmed/27453984 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1453-z Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Debate
Kirigia, Joses Muthuri
Pannenborg, Charles Ok
Amore, Luis Gabriel Cuervo
Ghannem, Hassen
IJsselmuiden, Carel
Nabyonga-Orem, Juliet
Global Forum 2015 dialogue on “From evidence to policy – thinking outside the box”: perspectives to improve evidence uptake and good practices in the African Region
title Global Forum 2015 dialogue on “From evidence to policy – thinking outside the box”: perspectives to improve evidence uptake and good practices in the African Region
title_full Global Forum 2015 dialogue on “From evidence to policy – thinking outside the box”: perspectives to improve evidence uptake and good practices in the African Region
title_fullStr Global Forum 2015 dialogue on “From evidence to policy – thinking outside the box”: perspectives to improve evidence uptake and good practices in the African Region
title_full_unstemmed Global Forum 2015 dialogue on “From evidence to policy – thinking outside the box”: perspectives to improve evidence uptake and good practices in the African Region
title_short Global Forum 2015 dialogue on “From evidence to policy – thinking outside the box”: perspectives to improve evidence uptake and good practices in the African Region
title_sort global forum 2015 dialogue on “from evidence to policy – thinking outside the box”: perspectives to improve evidence uptake and good practices in the african region
topic Debate
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4959371/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27453984
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1453-z
work_keys_str_mv AT kirigiajosesmuthuri globalforum2015dialogueonfromevidencetopolicythinkingoutsidetheboxperspectivestoimproveevidenceuptakeandgoodpracticesintheafricanregion
AT pannenborgcharlesok globalforum2015dialogueonfromevidencetopolicythinkingoutsidetheboxperspectivestoimproveevidenceuptakeandgoodpracticesintheafricanregion
AT amoreluisgabrielcuervo globalforum2015dialogueonfromevidencetopolicythinkingoutsidetheboxperspectivestoimproveevidenceuptakeandgoodpracticesintheafricanregion
AT ghannemhassen globalforum2015dialogueonfromevidencetopolicythinkingoutsidetheboxperspectivestoimproveevidenceuptakeandgoodpracticesintheafricanregion
AT ijsselmuidencarel globalforum2015dialogueonfromevidencetopolicythinkingoutsidetheboxperspectivestoimproveevidenceuptakeandgoodpracticesintheafricanregion
AT nabyongaoremjuliet globalforum2015dialogueonfromevidencetopolicythinkingoutsidetheboxperspectivestoimproveevidenceuptakeandgoodpracticesintheafricanregion