Cargando…
Research Funding: the Case for a Modified Lottery
The time-honored mechanism of allocating funds based on ranking of proposals by scientific peer review is no longer effective, because review panels cannot accurately stratify proposals to identify the most meritorious ones. Bias has a major influence on funding decisions, and the impact of reviewer...
Autores principales: | Fang, Ferric C., Casadevall, Arturo |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Society for Microbiology
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4959526/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27073093 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00422-16 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Erratum for Fang and Casadevall, Research Funding: the Case for a Modified Lottery
por: Fang, Ferric C., et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Reply to “Funding by Lottery: Political Problems and Research Opportunities”
por: Casadevall, Arturo, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Funding by Lottery: Political Problems and Research Opportunities
por: Barnett, Adrian G.
Publicado: (2016) -
Rigorous Science: a How-To Guide
por: Casadevall, Arturo, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Revolutionary Science
por: Casadevall, Arturo, et al.
Publicado: (2016)