Cargando…

Validation of a Tablet as a Tangent Perimeter

PURPOSE: To describe a tangent perimeter developed on an Apple iPad (Melbourne Rapid Field, MRF). METHODS: The MRF assays 66 locations over 28° × 18° by having the patient vary fixation. Spot size and background luminance are paired to yield constant thresholds across the field. Spot locations were...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vingrys, Algis J., Healey, Jessica K., Liew, Sheryl, Saharinen, Veera, Tran, Michael, Wu, William, Kong, George Y. X.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4959816/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27486553
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.5.4.3
_version_ 1782444451323445248
author Vingrys, Algis J.
Healey, Jessica K.
Liew, Sheryl
Saharinen, Veera
Tran, Michael
Wu, William
Kong, George Y. X.
author_facet Vingrys, Algis J.
Healey, Jessica K.
Liew, Sheryl
Saharinen, Veera
Tran, Michael
Wu, William
Kong, George Y. X.
author_sort Vingrys, Algis J.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To describe a tangent perimeter developed on an Apple iPad (Melbourne Rapid Field, MRF). METHODS: The MRF assays 66 locations over 28° × 18° by having the patient vary fixation. Spot size and background luminance are paired to yield constant thresholds across the field. Spot locations were selected after analysis of 360 patient records. The capacity of the MRF to detect defects was verified in five participants (age 22–28 years) by simulating four common losses: central, arcuate, quadrant, and hemianopia. We also consider the effect of: myosis, blur (+3 DS), viewing distance (25–75 cm), ambient light (4–600 lux), and retest repeatability (1-week apart) on thresholds. Group means [SEM] are compared by Student's t-test and repeatability returned from Bland-Altman analysis. RESULTS: We found a 5 cd.m(−2) background replicates the Weber fraction produced by a Humphrey spot shown at 35 dB. Our variable size gives constant thresholds (29.6 [0.2] dB) across all locations. Altering viewing distance (25 cm = 29.8 [0.9] dB; 75 cm = 28.9 [0.6] dB) and ambient lighting (4 lux, 29.8 [0.8] dB; 600 lux, 29.5 [1.0] dB) did not affect threshold although screen reflections must be avoided. Myosis (−1.2 dB) and blur (−1.5 dB) will reduce sensitivity (P < 0.05). Simulated defects with a mean defect (MD) of −3.3 dB are detected by the MRF. The Coefficient of repeatability was 9.6% (SD ∼2.9 dB) in normal regions and 48.1% (SD ∼8.0 dB) in areas of simulated scotoma. CONCLUSIONS: Tablet technology can return efficient and reliable thresholds to 30° as a tangent perimeter. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: The MRF will allow testing at a bedside, at home, in rural or remote areas, or where equipment cannot be financed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4959816
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49598162016-08-02 Validation of a Tablet as a Tangent Perimeter Vingrys, Algis J. Healey, Jessica K. Liew, Sheryl Saharinen, Veera Tran, Michael Wu, William Kong, George Y. X. Transl Vis Sci Technol New Developments in Vision Research PURPOSE: To describe a tangent perimeter developed on an Apple iPad (Melbourne Rapid Field, MRF). METHODS: The MRF assays 66 locations over 28° × 18° by having the patient vary fixation. Spot size and background luminance are paired to yield constant thresholds across the field. Spot locations were selected after analysis of 360 patient records. The capacity of the MRF to detect defects was verified in five participants (age 22–28 years) by simulating four common losses: central, arcuate, quadrant, and hemianopia. We also consider the effect of: myosis, blur (+3 DS), viewing distance (25–75 cm), ambient light (4–600 lux), and retest repeatability (1-week apart) on thresholds. Group means [SEM] are compared by Student's t-test and repeatability returned from Bland-Altman analysis. RESULTS: We found a 5 cd.m(−2) background replicates the Weber fraction produced by a Humphrey spot shown at 35 dB. Our variable size gives constant thresholds (29.6 [0.2] dB) across all locations. Altering viewing distance (25 cm = 29.8 [0.9] dB; 75 cm = 28.9 [0.6] dB) and ambient lighting (4 lux, 29.8 [0.8] dB; 600 lux, 29.5 [1.0] dB) did not affect threshold although screen reflections must be avoided. Myosis (−1.2 dB) and blur (−1.5 dB) will reduce sensitivity (P < 0.05). Simulated defects with a mean defect (MD) of −3.3 dB are detected by the MRF. The Coefficient of repeatability was 9.6% (SD ∼2.9 dB) in normal regions and 48.1% (SD ∼8.0 dB) in areas of simulated scotoma. CONCLUSIONS: Tablet technology can return efficient and reliable thresholds to 30° as a tangent perimeter. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: The MRF will allow testing at a bedside, at home, in rural or remote areas, or where equipment cannot be financed. The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2016-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC4959816/ /pubmed/27486553 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.5.4.3 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle New Developments in Vision Research
Vingrys, Algis J.
Healey, Jessica K.
Liew, Sheryl
Saharinen, Veera
Tran, Michael
Wu, William
Kong, George Y. X.
Validation of a Tablet as a Tangent Perimeter
title Validation of a Tablet as a Tangent Perimeter
title_full Validation of a Tablet as a Tangent Perimeter
title_fullStr Validation of a Tablet as a Tangent Perimeter
title_full_unstemmed Validation of a Tablet as a Tangent Perimeter
title_short Validation of a Tablet as a Tangent Perimeter
title_sort validation of a tablet as a tangent perimeter
topic New Developments in Vision Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4959816/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27486553
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.5.4.3
work_keys_str_mv AT vingrysalgisj validationofatabletasatangentperimeter
AT healeyjessicak validationofatabletasatangentperimeter
AT liewsheryl validationofatabletasatangentperimeter
AT saharinenveera validationofatabletasatangentperimeter
AT tranmichael validationofatabletasatangentperimeter
AT wuwilliam validationofatabletasatangentperimeter
AT konggeorgeyx validationofatabletasatangentperimeter