Cargando…

3D haptic modelling for preoperative planning of hepatic resection: A systematic review

INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND: Three dimensional (3D) printing has gained popularity in the medical field because of increased research in the field of haptic 3D modeling. We review the role of 3D printing with specific reference to liver directed applications. METHODS: A literature search was perform...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Soon, David S.C., Chae, Michael P., Pilgrim, Charles H.C., Rozen, Warren Matthew, Spychal, Robert T., Hunter-Smith, David J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4959920/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27489617
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2016.07.002
_version_ 1782444459438374912
author Soon, David S.C.
Chae, Michael P.
Pilgrim, Charles H.C.
Rozen, Warren Matthew
Spychal, Robert T.
Hunter-Smith, David J.
author_facet Soon, David S.C.
Chae, Michael P.
Pilgrim, Charles H.C.
Rozen, Warren Matthew
Spychal, Robert T.
Hunter-Smith, David J.
author_sort Soon, David S.C.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND: Three dimensional (3D) printing has gained popularity in the medical field because of increased research in the field of haptic 3D modeling. We review the role of 3D printing with specific reference to liver directed applications. METHODS: A literature search was performed using the scientific databases Medline and PubMed. We performed this in-line with the PRISMA [20] statement. We only included articles in English, available in full text, published about adults, about liver surgery and published between 2005 and 2015. The 3D model of a patient's liver venous vasculature and metastasis was prepared from a CT scan using Osirix software (Pixmeo, Gineva, Switzerland) and printed using our 3D printer (MakerBot Replicator Z18, US). To validate the model, measurements from the inferior vena cava (IVC) were compared between the CT scan and the 3D printed model. RESULTS: A total of six studies were retrieved on 3D printing directly related to a liver application. While stereolithography (STL) remains the gold standard in medical additive manufacturing, Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF), is cheaper and may be more applicable. We found our liver 3D model made by FFF had a 0.1 ± 0.06 mm margin of error (mean ± standard deviation) compared with the CT scans. CONCLUSION: 3D printing in general surgery is yet to be thoroughly exploited. The most relevant feature of interest with regard to liver surgery is the ability to view the 3D dimensional relationship of the various hepatic and portal veins with respect to tumor deposits when planning hepatic resection. Systematic review registration number: researchregistry1348.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4959920
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49599202016-08-03 3D haptic modelling for preoperative planning of hepatic resection: A systematic review Soon, David S.C. Chae, Michael P. Pilgrim, Charles H.C. Rozen, Warren Matthew Spychal, Robert T. Hunter-Smith, David J. Ann Med Surg (Lond) Review INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND: Three dimensional (3D) printing has gained popularity in the medical field because of increased research in the field of haptic 3D modeling. We review the role of 3D printing with specific reference to liver directed applications. METHODS: A literature search was performed using the scientific databases Medline and PubMed. We performed this in-line with the PRISMA [20] statement. We only included articles in English, available in full text, published about adults, about liver surgery and published between 2005 and 2015. The 3D model of a patient's liver venous vasculature and metastasis was prepared from a CT scan using Osirix software (Pixmeo, Gineva, Switzerland) and printed using our 3D printer (MakerBot Replicator Z18, US). To validate the model, measurements from the inferior vena cava (IVC) were compared between the CT scan and the 3D printed model. RESULTS: A total of six studies were retrieved on 3D printing directly related to a liver application. While stereolithography (STL) remains the gold standard in medical additive manufacturing, Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF), is cheaper and may be more applicable. We found our liver 3D model made by FFF had a 0.1 ± 0.06 mm margin of error (mean ± standard deviation) compared with the CT scans. CONCLUSION: 3D printing in general surgery is yet to be thoroughly exploited. The most relevant feature of interest with regard to liver surgery is the ability to view the 3D dimensional relationship of the various hepatic and portal veins with respect to tumor deposits when planning hepatic resection. Systematic review registration number: researchregistry1348. Elsevier 2016-07-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4959920/ /pubmed/27489617 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2016.07.002 Text en Crown Copyright © 2016 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of IJS Publishing Group Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Soon, David S.C.
Chae, Michael P.
Pilgrim, Charles H.C.
Rozen, Warren Matthew
Spychal, Robert T.
Hunter-Smith, David J.
3D haptic modelling for preoperative planning of hepatic resection: A systematic review
title 3D haptic modelling for preoperative planning of hepatic resection: A systematic review
title_full 3D haptic modelling for preoperative planning of hepatic resection: A systematic review
title_fullStr 3D haptic modelling for preoperative planning of hepatic resection: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed 3D haptic modelling for preoperative planning of hepatic resection: A systematic review
title_short 3D haptic modelling for preoperative planning of hepatic resection: A systematic review
title_sort 3d haptic modelling for preoperative planning of hepatic resection: a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4959920/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27489617
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2016.07.002
work_keys_str_mv AT soondavidsc 3dhapticmodellingforpreoperativeplanningofhepaticresectionasystematicreview
AT chaemichaelp 3dhapticmodellingforpreoperativeplanningofhepaticresectionasystematicreview
AT pilgrimcharleshc 3dhapticmodellingforpreoperativeplanningofhepaticresectionasystematicreview
AT rozenwarrenmatthew 3dhapticmodellingforpreoperativeplanningofhepaticresectionasystematicreview
AT spychalrobertt 3dhapticmodellingforpreoperativeplanningofhepaticresectionasystematicreview
AT huntersmithdavidj 3dhapticmodellingforpreoperativeplanningofhepaticresectionasystematicreview