Cargando…
A comparison of the clinical effect of two fixation methods on Hoffa fractures
INTRODUCTION: Hoffa fractures are rare and difficult to treat for orthopaedic surgeons. The mechanism of injury of Hoffa fracture is still unknown and the operation approch and fixation method are still controversial. The aim of this study is to compare the clinical effect between two fixation metho...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4960084/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27512623 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2861-6 |
_version_ | 1782444477465493504 |
---|---|
author | Xu, Yi Li, Heng Yang, Hong-hang Pan, Zhi-jun |
author_facet | Xu, Yi Li, Heng Yang, Hong-hang Pan, Zhi-jun |
author_sort | Xu, Yi |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Hoffa fractures are rare and difficult to treat for orthopaedic surgeons. The mechanism of injury of Hoffa fracture is still unknown and the operation approch and fixation method are still controversial. The aim of this study is to compare the clinical effect between two fixation methods on Hoffa fractures. CASE DESCRIPTION: From April 2004 to July 2013, we treated eleven patients (new method group) with Hoffa fracture using the new fixation method (fixed with intercondylar screw and crossed screws) and sixteen patients (traditional method group) using the traditional fixation method (fixed with anteroposteriorly placed screws). All documents from their admission until the last followup in December 2015 were reviewed, data regarding complications collected and results were evaluated using the Knee Society Score. DISCUSSION AND EVALUATION: After an average follow-up period of 27.1 months (range 24–32 months), all fractures had healed. The average healing time of the new method group was 11.36 weeks (range 9–14 weeks) and the average healing time of the traditional method group was 11.88 weeks (range 9–14 weeks). According to the Knee Society Score, the average score of the new method group was 176.36 points (range 125–199 points), and the average score of the traditional method group was 171.19 points (range 148–197 points). Statistical analysis (t test, t = 0.76, P > 0.05) showed that the difference of both the healing time (t test, t = 0.94, P > 0.05) and the score between these two groups was not significant. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that the new fixation method for Hoffa fracture is as effective as the traditional method and may provide a new way to treat Hoffa fractures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4960084 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49600842016-08-10 A comparison of the clinical effect of two fixation methods on Hoffa fractures Xu, Yi Li, Heng Yang, Hong-hang Pan, Zhi-jun Springerplus Case Study INTRODUCTION: Hoffa fractures are rare and difficult to treat for orthopaedic surgeons. The mechanism of injury of Hoffa fracture is still unknown and the operation approch and fixation method are still controversial. The aim of this study is to compare the clinical effect between two fixation methods on Hoffa fractures. CASE DESCRIPTION: From April 2004 to July 2013, we treated eleven patients (new method group) with Hoffa fracture using the new fixation method (fixed with intercondylar screw and crossed screws) and sixteen patients (traditional method group) using the traditional fixation method (fixed with anteroposteriorly placed screws). All documents from their admission until the last followup in December 2015 were reviewed, data regarding complications collected and results were evaluated using the Knee Society Score. DISCUSSION AND EVALUATION: After an average follow-up period of 27.1 months (range 24–32 months), all fractures had healed. The average healing time of the new method group was 11.36 weeks (range 9–14 weeks) and the average healing time of the traditional method group was 11.88 weeks (range 9–14 weeks). According to the Knee Society Score, the average score of the new method group was 176.36 points (range 125–199 points), and the average score of the traditional method group was 171.19 points (range 148–197 points). Statistical analysis (t test, t = 0.76, P > 0.05) showed that the difference of both the healing time (t test, t = 0.94, P > 0.05) and the score between these two groups was not significant. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that the new fixation method for Hoffa fracture is as effective as the traditional method and may provide a new way to treat Hoffa fractures. Springer International Publishing 2016-07-25 /pmc/articles/PMC4960084/ /pubmed/27512623 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2861-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Case Study Xu, Yi Li, Heng Yang, Hong-hang Pan, Zhi-jun A comparison of the clinical effect of two fixation methods on Hoffa fractures |
title | A comparison of the clinical effect of two fixation methods on Hoffa fractures |
title_full | A comparison of the clinical effect of two fixation methods on Hoffa fractures |
title_fullStr | A comparison of the clinical effect of two fixation methods on Hoffa fractures |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparison of the clinical effect of two fixation methods on Hoffa fractures |
title_short | A comparison of the clinical effect of two fixation methods on Hoffa fractures |
title_sort | comparison of the clinical effect of two fixation methods on hoffa fractures |
topic | Case Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4960084/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27512623 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2861-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT xuyi acomparisonoftheclinicaleffectoftwofixationmethodsonhoffafractures AT liheng acomparisonoftheclinicaleffectoftwofixationmethodsonhoffafractures AT yanghonghang acomparisonoftheclinicaleffectoftwofixationmethodsonhoffafractures AT panzhijun acomparisonoftheclinicaleffectoftwofixationmethodsonhoffafractures AT xuyi comparisonoftheclinicaleffectoftwofixationmethodsonhoffafractures AT liheng comparisonoftheclinicaleffectoftwofixationmethodsonhoffafractures AT yanghonghang comparisonoftheclinicaleffectoftwofixationmethodsonhoffafractures AT panzhijun comparisonoftheclinicaleffectoftwofixationmethodsonhoffafractures |