Cargando…
Distinct Roles of SOM and VIP Interneurons during Cortical Up States
During cortical network activity, recurrent synaptic excitation among pyramidal neurons is approximately balanced by synaptic inhibition, which is provided by a vast diversity of inhibitory interneurons. The relative contributions of different interneuron subtypes to inhibitory tone during cortical...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4960236/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27507936 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncir.2016.00052 |
_version_ | 1782444490921869312 |
---|---|
author | Neske, Garrett T. Connors, Barry W. |
author_facet | Neske, Garrett T. Connors, Barry W. |
author_sort | Neske, Garrett T. |
collection | PubMed |
description | During cortical network activity, recurrent synaptic excitation among pyramidal neurons is approximately balanced by synaptic inhibition, which is provided by a vast diversity of inhibitory interneurons. The relative contributions of different interneuron subtypes to inhibitory tone during cortical network activity is not well-understood. We previously showed that many of the major interneuron subtypes in mouse barrel cortex are highly active during Up states (Neske et al., 2015); while fast-spiking (FS), parvalbumin (PV)-positive cells were the most active interneuron subtype, many non-fast-spiking (NFS), PV-negative interneurons were as active or more active than neighboring pyramidal cells. This suggests that the NFS cells could play a role in maintaining or modulating Up states. Here, using optogenetic techniques, we further dissected the functional roles during Up states of two major NFS, PV-negative interneuron subtypes: somatostatin (SOM)-positive cells and vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP)-positive cells. We found that while pyramidal cell excitability during Up states significantly increased when SOM cells were optogenetically silenced, VIP cells did not influence pyramidal cell excitability either upon optogenetic silencing or activation. VIP cells failed to contribute to Up states despite their ability to inhibit SOM cells strongly. We suggest that the contribution of VIP cells to the excitability of pyramidal cells may vary with cortical state. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4960236 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-49602362016-08-09 Distinct Roles of SOM and VIP Interneurons during Cortical Up States Neske, Garrett T. Connors, Barry W. Front Neural Circuits Neuroscience During cortical network activity, recurrent synaptic excitation among pyramidal neurons is approximately balanced by synaptic inhibition, which is provided by a vast diversity of inhibitory interneurons. The relative contributions of different interneuron subtypes to inhibitory tone during cortical network activity is not well-understood. We previously showed that many of the major interneuron subtypes in mouse barrel cortex are highly active during Up states (Neske et al., 2015); while fast-spiking (FS), parvalbumin (PV)-positive cells were the most active interneuron subtype, many non-fast-spiking (NFS), PV-negative interneurons were as active or more active than neighboring pyramidal cells. This suggests that the NFS cells could play a role in maintaining or modulating Up states. Here, using optogenetic techniques, we further dissected the functional roles during Up states of two major NFS, PV-negative interneuron subtypes: somatostatin (SOM)-positive cells and vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP)-positive cells. We found that while pyramidal cell excitability during Up states significantly increased when SOM cells were optogenetically silenced, VIP cells did not influence pyramidal cell excitability either upon optogenetic silencing or activation. VIP cells failed to contribute to Up states despite their ability to inhibit SOM cells strongly. We suggest that the contribution of VIP cells to the excitability of pyramidal cells may vary with cortical state. Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-07-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4960236/ /pubmed/27507936 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncir.2016.00052 Text en Copyright © 2016 Neske and Connors. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Neske, Garrett T. Connors, Barry W. Distinct Roles of SOM and VIP Interneurons during Cortical Up States |
title | Distinct Roles of SOM and VIP Interneurons during Cortical Up States |
title_full | Distinct Roles of SOM and VIP Interneurons during Cortical Up States |
title_fullStr | Distinct Roles of SOM and VIP Interneurons during Cortical Up States |
title_full_unstemmed | Distinct Roles of SOM and VIP Interneurons during Cortical Up States |
title_short | Distinct Roles of SOM and VIP Interneurons during Cortical Up States |
title_sort | distinct roles of som and vip interneurons during cortical up states |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4960236/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27507936 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncir.2016.00052 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT neskegarrettt distinctrolesofsomandvipinterneuronsduringcorticalupstates AT connorsbarryw distinctrolesofsomandvipinterneuronsduringcorticalupstates |