Cargando…

How I report breast magnetic resonance imaging studies for breast cancer staging and screening

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the breast is the most sensitive imaging technique for the diagnosis and local staging of primary breast cancer and yet, despite the fact that it has been in use for 20 years, there is little evidence that its widespread uncritical adoption has had a positive impa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Vinnicombe, Sarah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4960688/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27456031
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40644-016-0078-0
_version_ 1782444568688459776
author Vinnicombe, Sarah
author_facet Vinnicombe, Sarah
author_sort Vinnicombe, Sarah
collection PubMed
description Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the breast is the most sensitive imaging technique for the diagnosis and local staging of primary breast cancer and yet, despite the fact that it has been in use for 20 years, there is little evidence that its widespread uncritical adoption has had a positive impact on patient-related outcomes. This has been attributed previously to the low specificity that might be expected with such a sensitive modality, but with modern techniques and protocols, the specificity and positive predictive value for malignancy can exceed that of breast ultrasound and mammography. A more likely explanation is that historically, clinicians have acted on MRI findings and altered surgical plans without prior histological confirmation. Furthermore, modern adjuvant therapy for breast cancer has improved so much that it has become a very tall order to show a an improvement in outcomes such as local recurrence rates. In order to obtain clinically useful information, it is necessary to understand the strengths and weaknesses of the technique and the physiological processes reflected in breast MRI. An appropriate indication for the scan, proper patient preparation and good scan technique, with rigorous quality assurance, are all essential prerequisites for a diagnostically relevant study. The use of recognised descriptors from a standardised lexicon is helpful, since assessment can then dictate subsequent recommendations for management, as in the American College of Radiology BI-RADS (Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System) lexicon (Morris et al., ACR BI-RADS® Atlas, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System, 2013). It also enables audit of the service. However, perhaps the most critical factor in the generation of a meaningful report is for the reporting radiologist to have a thorough understanding of the clinical question and of the findings that will influence management. This has never been more important than at present, when we are in the throes of a remarkable paradigm shift in the treatment of both early stage and locally advanced breast cancer. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40644-016-0078-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4960688
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49606882016-07-27 How I report breast magnetic resonance imaging studies for breast cancer staging and screening Vinnicombe, Sarah Cancer Imaging Review Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the breast is the most sensitive imaging technique for the diagnosis and local staging of primary breast cancer and yet, despite the fact that it has been in use for 20 years, there is little evidence that its widespread uncritical adoption has had a positive impact on patient-related outcomes. This has been attributed previously to the low specificity that might be expected with such a sensitive modality, but with modern techniques and protocols, the specificity and positive predictive value for malignancy can exceed that of breast ultrasound and mammography. A more likely explanation is that historically, clinicians have acted on MRI findings and altered surgical plans without prior histological confirmation. Furthermore, modern adjuvant therapy for breast cancer has improved so much that it has become a very tall order to show a an improvement in outcomes such as local recurrence rates. In order to obtain clinically useful information, it is necessary to understand the strengths and weaknesses of the technique and the physiological processes reflected in breast MRI. An appropriate indication for the scan, proper patient preparation and good scan technique, with rigorous quality assurance, are all essential prerequisites for a diagnostically relevant study. The use of recognised descriptors from a standardised lexicon is helpful, since assessment can then dictate subsequent recommendations for management, as in the American College of Radiology BI-RADS (Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System) lexicon (Morris et al., ACR BI-RADS® Atlas, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System, 2013). It also enables audit of the service. However, perhaps the most critical factor in the generation of a meaningful report is for the reporting radiologist to have a thorough understanding of the clinical question and of the findings that will influence management. This has never been more important than at present, when we are in the throes of a remarkable paradigm shift in the treatment of both early stage and locally advanced breast cancer. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40644-016-0078-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-07-25 /pmc/articles/PMC4960688/ /pubmed/27456031 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40644-016-0078-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Review
Vinnicombe, Sarah
How I report breast magnetic resonance imaging studies for breast cancer staging and screening
title How I report breast magnetic resonance imaging studies for breast cancer staging and screening
title_full How I report breast magnetic resonance imaging studies for breast cancer staging and screening
title_fullStr How I report breast magnetic resonance imaging studies for breast cancer staging and screening
title_full_unstemmed How I report breast magnetic resonance imaging studies for breast cancer staging and screening
title_short How I report breast magnetic resonance imaging studies for breast cancer staging and screening
title_sort how i report breast magnetic resonance imaging studies for breast cancer staging and screening
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4960688/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27456031
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40644-016-0078-0
work_keys_str_mv AT vinnicombesarah howireportbreastmagneticresonanceimagingstudiesforbreastcancerstagingandscreening