Cargando…

The reporting and diagnosis of uterine fibroids in the UK: an observational study

BACKGROUND: Uterine fibroids (UFs) are the most common benign tumour in women, and many undergo hysterectomy or uterus-preserving procedures (UPPs) to manage their symptoms. We aimed to validate the recording of UFs in a primary care database, The Health Improvement Network (THIN), and to determine...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Martín-Merino, Elisa, Wallander, Mari-Ann, Andersson, Susan, Soriano-Gabarró, Montse, Rodríguez, Luis Alberto García
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4960833/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27456692
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-016-0320-8
_version_ 1782444595471187968
author Martín-Merino, Elisa
Wallander, Mari-Ann
Andersson, Susan
Soriano-Gabarró, Montse
Rodríguez, Luis Alberto García
author_facet Martín-Merino, Elisa
Wallander, Mari-Ann
Andersson, Susan
Soriano-Gabarró, Montse
Rodríguez, Luis Alberto García
author_sort Martín-Merino, Elisa
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Uterine fibroids (UFs) are the most common benign tumour in women, and many undergo hysterectomy or uterus-preserving procedures (UPPs) to manage their symptoms. We aimed to validate the recording of UFs in a primary care database, The Health Improvement Network (THIN), and to determine the incidence of UFs in the UK. METHODS: In this observational study, women in THIN aged 15–54 years between January 2000 and December 2009 with no previous record of UFs, hysterectomy or UPPs were identified. Individuals were followed up until there was a Read code indicating UFs, they reached 55 years of age or died, or the study ended. Among those without a UF code, women were identified with a code for hysterectomy, UPPs or heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB). Anonymized patient profiles from each category were randomly selected and reviewed. Subsequently, primary care physicians were asked to complete questionnaires to verify the diagnosis for a randomly selected subgroup. RESULTS: In total, 737,638 women were identified who met the initial inclusion criteria. The numbers of women with a code for UFs, hysterectomy, UPPs and HMB were 9380, 11,002, 3220 and 60,915, respectively; the proportions of confirmed cases of UFs were 88.8, 29.7, 57.7 and 15.9 %. The estimated number of women with UFs was 23,140 (64.0 % without a recorded UF diagnosis). The overall incidence of UFs was 5.8 per 1000 woman-years. CONCLUSIONS: UFs were confirmed in a high proportion of women with UF Read codes. However, almost two-thirds of cases were identified among women with a code for hysterectomy, UPPs or HMB. These results show that UFs are under-recorded in UK primary care, and suggest that primary care physicians tend to code the symptoms of UFs more often than the diagnosis. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12905-016-0320-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4960833
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49608332016-07-27 The reporting and diagnosis of uterine fibroids in the UK: an observational study Martín-Merino, Elisa Wallander, Mari-Ann Andersson, Susan Soriano-Gabarró, Montse Rodríguez, Luis Alberto García BMC Womens Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Uterine fibroids (UFs) are the most common benign tumour in women, and many undergo hysterectomy or uterus-preserving procedures (UPPs) to manage their symptoms. We aimed to validate the recording of UFs in a primary care database, The Health Improvement Network (THIN), and to determine the incidence of UFs in the UK. METHODS: In this observational study, women in THIN aged 15–54 years between January 2000 and December 2009 with no previous record of UFs, hysterectomy or UPPs were identified. Individuals were followed up until there was a Read code indicating UFs, they reached 55 years of age or died, or the study ended. Among those without a UF code, women were identified with a code for hysterectomy, UPPs or heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB). Anonymized patient profiles from each category were randomly selected and reviewed. Subsequently, primary care physicians were asked to complete questionnaires to verify the diagnosis for a randomly selected subgroup. RESULTS: In total, 737,638 women were identified who met the initial inclusion criteria. The numbers of women with a code for UFs, hysterectomy, UPPs and HMB were 9380, 11,002, 3220 and 60,915, respectively; the proportions of confirmed cases of UFs were 88.8, 29.7, 57.7 and 15.9 %. The estimated number of women with UFs was 23,140 (64.0 % without a recorded UF diagnosis). The overall incidence of UFs was 5.8 per 1000 woman-years. CONCLUSIONS: UFs were confirmed in a high proportion of women with UF Read codes. However, almost two-thirds of cases were identified among women with a code for hysterectomy, UPPs or HMB. These results show that UFs are under-recorded in UK primary care, and suggest that primary care physicians tend to code the symptoms of UFs more often than the diagnosis. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12905-016-0320-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-07-25 /pmc/articles/PMC4960833/ /pubmed/27456692 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-016-0320-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Martín-Merino, Elisa
Wallander, Mari-Ann
Andersson, Susan
Soriano-Gabarró, Montse
Rodríguez, Luis Alberto García
The reporting and diagnosis of uterine fibroids in the UK: an observational study
title The reporting and diagnosis of uterine fibroids in the UK: an observational study
title_full The reporting and diagnosis of uterine fibroids in the UK: an observational study
title_fullStr The reporting and diagnosis of uterine fibroids in the UK: an observational study
title_full_unstemmed The reporting and diagnosis of uterine fibroids in the UK: an observational study
title_short The reporting and diagnosis of uterine fibroids in the UK: an observational study
title_sort reporting and diagnosis of uterine fibroids in the uk: an observational study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4960833/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27456692
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-016-0320-8
work_keys_str_mv AT martinmerinoelisa thereportinganddiagnosisofuterinefibroidsintheukanobservationalstudy
AT wallandermariann thereportinganddiagnosisofuterinefibroidsintheukanobservationalstudy
AT anderssonsusan thereportinganddiagnosisofuterinefibroidsintheukanobservationalstudy
AT sorianogabarromontse thereportinganddiagnosisofuterinefibroidsintheukanobservationalstudy
AT rodriguezluisalbertogarcia thereportinganddiagnosisofuterinefibroidsintheukanobservationalstudy
AT martinmerinoelisa reportinganddiagnosisofuterinefibroidsintheukanobservationalstudy
AT wallandermariann reportinganddiagnosisofuterinefibroidsintheukanobservationalstudy
AT anderssonsusan reportinganddiagnosisofuterinefibroidsintheukanobservationalstudy
AT sorianogabarromontse reportinganddiagnosisofuterinefibroidsintheukanobservationalstudy
AT rodriguezluisalbertogarcia reportinganddiagnosisofuterinefibroidsintheukanobservationalstudy