Cargando…

Development and validation of a novel questionnaire for self-determination of the range of motion of wrist and elbow

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to develop and validate a novel self-administered questionnaire for assessing the patient’s own range of motion (ROM) of the wrist and the elbow. METHODS: In a prospective clinical study from January 2015 to June 2015, 101 consecutive patients were evaluated wit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schnetzke, Marc, Schüler, Svenja, Keil, Holger, Aytac, Sara, Studier-Fischer, Stefan, Grützner, Paul-Alfred, Guehring, Thorsten
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4960848/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27457712
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-016-1171-z
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to develop and validate a novel self-administered questionnaire for assessing the patient’s own range of motion (ROM) of the wrist and the elbow. METHODS: In a prospective clinical study from January 2015 to June 2015, 101 consecutive patients were evaluated with a novel, self-administered, diagram-based, wrist motion assessment score (W-MAS) and elbow motion assessment score (E-MAS). The questionnaire was statistically evaluated for test-retest reliability, patient-physician agreement, comparison with healthy population, and influence of covariates (age, gender, affected side and involvement in workers’ compensation cases). RESULTS: Assessment of patient-physician agreement demonstrated almost perfect agreement (k > 0.80) with regard to six out of eight items. There was substantial agreement with regard to two items: elbow extension (k = 0.76) and pronation (k = 0.75). The assessment of the test-retest reliability revealed at least substantial agreement (k = 0.70). The questionnaire revealed a high discriminative power when comparing the healthy population with the study group (p = 0.007 or lower for every item). Age, gender, affected side and involvement in workers’ compensation cases did not in general significantly influence the patient-physician agreement for the questionnaire. CONCLUSION: The W-MAS and E-MAS are valid and reliable self-administered questionnaires that provide a high level of patient-physician agreement for the assessments of wrist and elbow ROM. Level of evidence: Diagnostic study, Level II ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12891-016-1171-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.