Cargando…

Efficacy and Safety of Esmolol in Treatment of Patients with Septic Shock

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have suggested that β1-receptor blockers benefit septic shock patients. This study aimed to determine whether β1-receptor blockers benefit tissue perfusion in sepsis and to identify parameters to reduce the risk of this drug in sepsis. METHODS: Consecutive septic shock p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Du, Wei, Wang, Xiao-Ting, Long, Yun, Liu, Da-Wei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4960954/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27411452
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0366-6999.185856
_version_ 1782444620906496000
author Du, Wei
Wang, Xiao-Ting
Long, Yun
Liu, Da-Wei
author_facet Du, Wei
Wang, Xiao-Ting
Long, Yun
Liu, Da-Wei
author_sort Du, Wei
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Previous studies have suggested that β1-receptor blockers benefit septic shock patients. This study aimed to determine whether β1-receptor blockers benefit tissue perfusion in sepsis and to identify parameters to reduce the risk of this drug in sepsis. METHODS: Consecutive septic shock patients were recruited from the Intensive Care Unit of Peking Union Medical College Hospital within 48 h of diagnosis. All patients were hemodynamically stable and satisfactorily sedated with a heart rate (HR) ≥100 beats/min. Esmolol therapy achieved the target HR of 10–15% lower than the baseline HR. Clinical and physiological data of patients were collected prospectively within 1 h prior to esmolol therapy and 2 h after achieving the targeted HR. RESULTS: Sixty-three patients were recruited. After esmolol therapy, blood pressure was unaltered, whereas stroke volume (SV) was increased compared with before esmolol therapy (43.6 ± 22.7 vs. 49.9 ± 23.7 ml, t = −2.3, P = 0.047). Tissue perfusion, including lactate levels (1.4 ± 0.8 vs. 1.1 ± 0.6 mmol/L, t = 2.6, P = 0.015) and the central venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide difference (5.6 ± 3.3 vs. 4.3 ± 2.2 mmHg, t = 2.6 P = 0.016), was also significantly decreased after esmolol therapy. For patients with increased SV (n = 42), cardiac efficiency improved, and esmolol therapy had a lower risk for a decrease in cardiac output (CO). Therefore, pretreatment cardiac systolic and diastolic parameters with (n = 42)/without (n = 21) an increase in SV were compared. Mitral lateral annular plane systolic excursion (MAPSElat) in patients with increased SV was significantly higher than that in those without increased SV (1.3 ± 0.3 vs. 1.1 ± 0.2 cm, t = 2.4, P = 0.034). CONCLUSIONS: SV of septic shock patients is increased following esmolol therapy. Although CO is also decreased with HR, tissue perfusion is not worse. MAPSElat can be used to predict an increase in SV before esmolol use. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01920776; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01920776?term=NCT01920776&rank=1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4960954
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-49609542016-08-05 Efficacy and Safety of Esmolol in Treatment of Patients with Septic Shock Du, Wei Wang, Xiao-Ting Long, Yun Liu, Da-Wei Chin Med J (Engl) Original Article BACKGROUND: Previous studies have suggested that β1-receptor blockers benefit septic shock patients. This study aimed to determine whether β1-receptor blockers benefit tissue perfusion in sepsis and to identify parameters to reduce the risk of this drug in sepsis. METHODS: Consecutive septic shock patients were recruited from the Intensive Care Unit of Peking Union Medical College Hospital within 48 h of diagnosis. All patients were hemodynamically stable and satisfactorily sedated with a heart rate (HR) ≥100 beats/min. Esmolol therapy achieved the target HR of 10–15% lower than the baseline HR. Clinical and physiological data of patients were collected prospectively within 1 h prior to esmolol therapy and 2 h after achieving the targeted HR. RESULTS: Sixty-three patients were recruited. After esmolol therapy, blood pressure was unaltered, whereas stroke volume (SV) was increased compared with before esmolol therapy (43.6 ± 22.7 vs. 49.9 ± 23.7 ml, t = −2.3, P = 0.047). Tissue perfusion, including lactate levels (1.4 ± 0.8 vs. 1.1 ± 0.6 mmol/L, t = 2.6, P = 0.015) and the central venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide difference (5.6 ± 3.3 vs. 4.3 ± 2.2 mmHg, t = 2.6 P = 0.016), was also significantly decreased after esmolol therapy. For patients with increased SV (n = 42), cardiac efficiency improved, and esmolol therapy had a lower risk for a decrease in cardiac output (CO). Therefore, pretreatment cardiac systolic and diastolic parameters with (n = 42)/without (n = 21) an increase in SV were compared. Mitral lateral annular plane systolic excursion (MAPSElat) in patients with increased SV was significantly higher than that in those without increased SV (1.3 ± 0.3 vs. 1.1 ± 0.2 cm, t = 2.4, P = 0.034). CONCLUSIONS: SV of septic shock patients is increased following esmolol therapy. Although CO is also decreased with HR, tissue perfusion is not worse. MAPSElat can be used to predict an increase in SV before esmolol use. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01920776; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01920776?term=NCT01920776&rank=1. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4960954/ /pubmed/27411452 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0366-6999.185856 Text en Copyright: © 2016 Chinese Medical Journal http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Du, Wei
Wang, Xiao-Ting
Long, Yun
Liu, Da-Wei
Efficacy and Safety of Esmolol in Treatment of Patients with Septic Shock
title Efficacy and Safety of Esmolol in Treatment of Patients with Septic Shock
title_full Efficacy and Safety of Esmolol in Treatment of Patients with Septic Shock
title_fullStr Efficacy and Safety of Esmolol in Treatment of Patients with Septic Shock
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and Safety of Esmolol in Treatment of Patients with Septic Shock
title_short Efficacy and Safety of Esmolol in Treatment of Patients with Septic Shock
title_sort efficacy and safety of esmolol in treatment of patients with septic shock
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4960954/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27411452
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0366-6999.185856
work_keys_str_mv AT duwei efficacyandsafetyofesmololintreatmentofpatientswithsepticshock
AT wangxiaoting efficacyandsafetyofesmololintreatmentofpatientswithsepticshock
AT longyun efficacyandsafetyofesmololintreatmentofpatientswithsepticshock
AT liudawei efficacyandsafetyofesmololintreatmentofpatientswithsepticshock