Cargando…

The Mitochondrial Unfolded Protein Response Protects against Anoxia in Caenorhabditis elegans

The mitochondrial unfolded protein response (UPR(mt)) is a surveillance pathway that defends proteostasis in the “powerhouse” of the cell. Activation of the UPR(mt) protects against stresses imposed by reactive oxygen species, respiratory chain deficits, and pathologic bacteria. Consistent with the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Peña, Salvador, Sherman, Teresa, Brookes, Paul S., Nehrke, Keith
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4961406/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27459203
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159989
Descripción
Sumario:The mitochondrial unfolded protein response (UPR(mt)) is a surveillance pathway that defends proteostasis in the “powerhouse” of the cell. Activation of the UPR(mt) protects against stresses imposed by reactive oxygen species, respiratory chain deficits, and pathologic bacteria. Consistent with the UPR(mt)’s role in adaption, we found that either its pharmacological or genetic activation by ethidium bromide (EtBr) or RNAi of the mitochondrial AAA-protease spg-7 was sufficient to reduce death in an anoxia-based Caenorhabditis elegans model of ischemia-reperfusion injury. The UPR(mt)-specific transcription factor atfs-1 was necessary for protection and atfs-1 gain-of-function (gf) mutants were endogenously protected from both death and dysfunction. Neurons exhibited less axonal degeneration following non-lethal anoxia-reperfusion (A-R) when the UPR(mt) was pre-activated, and consistent with the concept of mitochondrial stress leading to cell non-autonomous (ie. “remote”) effects, we found that restricted activation of the UPR(mt) in neurons decreased A-R death. However, expression of the atfs-1(gf) mutant in neurons, which resulted in a robust activation of a neuronal UPR(mt), did not upregulate the UPR(mt) in distal tissues, nor did it protect the worms from A-R toxicity. These findings suggest that remote signaling requires additional component(s) acting downstream of de facto mitochondrial stress.